BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29569820)

  • 1. Can pathological reports of rectal cancer provide national quality indicators?
    Keane C; Lin AY; Kramer N; Bissett I
    ANZ J Surg; 2018 Sep; 88(9):E639-E643. PubMed ID: 29569820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
    Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of a Single Surgeon-Based Transanal-Total Mesorectal Excision (TATME) for Rectal Cancer.
    Caycedo-Marulanda A; Jiang HY; Kohtakangas EL
    J Gastrointest Cancer; 2018 Dec; 49(4):455-462. PubMed ID: 28702861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
    de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Management of the positive pathologic circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: A national cancer database (NCDB) study.
    Reif de Paula T; Augestad KM; Kiran RP; Keller DS
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 47(2):296-303. PubMed ID: 32800594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pathology reporting of rectal cancer: a national audit.
    Keating J; Lolohea S; Kenwright D
    N Z Med J; 2003 Jul; 116(1178):U514. PubMed ID: 12897882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A single center retrospective study on surgical efficacy of T3NxM0 middle-low rectal cancer without neoadjuvant therapy].
    Liu P; Lou Z; Mei Z; Gao X; Hao L; Liu L; Gong H; Meng R; Yu E; Wang H; Wang H; Zhang W
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 22(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 30703796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Circumferential margin involvement after total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer: are all R1 resections equal?
    Beaufrère A; Guedj N; Maggiori L; Patroni A; Bedossa P; Panis Y
    Colorectal Dis; 2017 Nov; 19(11):O377-O385. PubMed ID: 28941054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The quality of pathological reports of postoperative specimens in rectal cancer: an audit from the Mazovia region.
    Olszyna-Serementa M; Kołodziejczyk M; Sprawka A; Nasierowska-Guttmejer A; Bujko K
    Pol J Pathol; 2009; 60(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 20069506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hospital and surgeon variation in positive circumferential resection margin among rectal cancer patients.
    Justiniano CF; Aquina CT; Fleming FJ; Xu Z; Boscoe FP; Schymura MJ; Temple LK; Becerra AZ
    Am J Surg; 2019 Nov; 218(5):881-886. PubMed ID: 30853095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of robotic total mesorectal excision upon pathology metrics in overweight males with low rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 836 cases.
    Gachabayov M; Lee H; Kajmolli A; Felsenreich DM; Bergamaschi R;
    Updates Surg; 2024 Apr; 76(2):505-512. PubMed ID: 38147292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for clinical stage II or stage III lower rectal cancer (JCOG0212): results from a multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial.
    Fujita S; Akasu T; Mizusawa J; Saito N; Kinugasa Y; Kanemitsu Y; Ohue M; Fujii S; Shiozawa M; Yamaguchi T; Moriya Y;
    Lancet Oncol; 2012 Jun; 13(6):616-21. PubMed ID: 22591948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Circumferential Resection Margin as a Hospital Quality Assessment Tool for Rectal Cancer Surgery.
    Patel SH; Hu CY; Massarweh NN; You YN; McCabe R; Dietz D; Facktor MA; Chang GJ
    J Am Coll Surg; 2020 Jun; 230(6):1008-1018.e5. PubMed ID: 32142927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. International evaluation of circumferential resection margins after rectal cancer resection: insights from the Swedish and Dutch audits.
    Detering R; Saraste D; de Neree Tot Babberich MPM; Dekker JWT; Wouters MWJM; van Geloven AAW; Bemelman WA; Tanis PJ; Martling A; Westerterp M;
    Colorectal Dis; 2020 Apr; 22(4):416-429. PubMed ID: 31696599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The clinical significance of a pathologically positive lymph node at the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer.
    Patel A; Green N; Sarmah P; Langman G; Chandrakumaran K; Youssef H
    Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Feb; 23(2):151-159. PubMed ID: 30783863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regional variance in treatment and outcomes of locally invasive (T4) rectal cancer in Australia and New Zealand: analysis of the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit.
    Dinger TL; Kroon HM; Traeger L; Bedrikovetski S; Hunter A; Sammour T
    ANZ J Surg; 2022 Jul; 92(7-8):1772-1780. PubMed ID: 35502647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Routine splenic flexure mobilization may increase compliance with pathological quality metrics in patients undergoing low anterior resection.
    Mouw TJ; King C; Ashcraft JH; Valentino JD; DiPasco PJ; Al-Kasspooles M
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 Jan; 21(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 30184316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preoperative predictive risk to cancer quality in robotic rectal cancer surgery.
    Achilli P; Radtke TS; Lovely JK; Behm KT; Mathis KL; Kelley SR; Merchea A; Colibaseanu DT; Larson DW
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 47(2):317-322. PubMed ID: 32928609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The clinical significance of the circumferential resection margin following preoperative pelvic chemo-radiotherapy in rectal cancer: why we need a common language.
    Glynne-Jones R; Mawdsley S; Novell JR
    Colorectal Dis; 2006 Nov; 8(9):800-7. PubMed ID: 17032329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Influence of Hospital Volume on Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement: Results of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit.
    Gietelink L; Henneman D; van Leersum NJ; de Noo M; Manusama E; Tanis PJ; Tollenaar RA; Wouters MW;
    Ann Surg; 2016 Apr; 263(4):745-50. PubMed ID: 25790120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.