BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29570118)

  • 1. Comparison of the Lubricity and Surface Roughness of 5 Cosmetic Contact Lenses.
    Lau C; Tosatti S; Mundorf M; Ebare K; Osborn Lorenz K
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Nov; 44 Suppl 2(2):S256-S265. PubMed ID: 29570118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy analysis of daily disposable limbal ring contact lenses.
    Lorenz KO; Kakkassery J; Boree D; Pinto D
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Sep; 97(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 24689948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of pigment location in tinted soft contact lenses.
    Jung JW; Han SH; Kim SA; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Jun; 39(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 26851138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of Pigment Location in Tinted Contact Lenses on the Ocular Surface.
    Jung JW; Han SH; Park SY; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 93(8):997-1003. PubMed ID: 27232903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of manufacturing technology and material composition on the surface characteristics of hydrogel contact lenses.
    Maldonado-Codina C; Efron N
    Clin Exp Optom; 2005 Nov; 88(6):396-404. PubMed ID: 16329748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identifying Pigment Enclosure in Cosmetic Contact Lenses.
    Korde V; McDow K; Rollins D; Stinchcomb R; Esposito H
    Eye Contact Lens; 2020 Jul; 46(4):228-233. PubMed ID: 31313698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of surface roughness and bacterial adhesion between cosmetic contact lenses and conventional contact lenses.
    Ji YW; Cho YJ; Lee CH; Hong SH; Chung DY; Kim EK; Lee HK
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jan; 41(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 25536530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Atomic force microscopy analysis of the effect of plasma treatment on gas permeable contact lens surface topography.
    Gill FR; Purslow C; Murphy PJ
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2019 Jun; 42(3):265-272. PubMed ID: 30808597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soft contact lens surface profile by atomic force microscopy.
    Giraldez MJ; Serra C; Lira M; Real Oliveira ME; Yebra-Pimentel E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Jul; 87(7):E475-81. PubMed ID: 20473237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. White light interferometry to characterize the hydrogel contact lens surface.
    Giraldez MJ; García-Resúa C; Lira M; Real Oliveira ME; Yebra-Pimentel E
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 May; 30(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 20444136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microscopic observation of unworn siloxane-hydrogel soft contact lenses by atomic force microscopy.
    González-Méijome JM; López-Alemany A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA; Refojo MF
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2006 Feb; 76(2):412-8. PubMed ID: 16184533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Limits in measurements of contact lens surface profile using atomic force microscopy.
    Brygoła R; Sęk S; Sokołowski M; Kowalczyk-Hernández M; Pniewski J
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2018 May; 165():229-234. PubMed ID: 29486451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scanning Electron Microscopy Findings With Energy-Dispersive X-ray Investigations of Cosmetically Tinted Contact Lenses.
    Hotta F; Eguchi H; Imai S; Miyamoto T; Mitamura-Aizawa S; Mitamura Y
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Sep; 41(5):291-6. PubMed ID: 25799458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of Cosmetics on the Surface Properties of Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses.
    Srinivasan S; Otchere H; Yu M; Yang J; Luensmann D; Jones L
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jul; 41(4):228-35. PubMed ID: 25719434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microbial adherence to cosmetic contact lenses.
    Chan KY; Cho P; Boost M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Aug; 37(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 24440107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Atomic force microscopy and Langmuir-Blodgett monolayer technique to assess contact lens deposits and human meibum extracts.
    Hagedorn S; Drolle E; Lorentz H; Srinivasan S; Leonenko Z; Jones L
    J Optom; 2015; 8(3):187-99. PubMed ID: 25620317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ToF-SIMS and AFM Characterization of Brown Cosmetic Contact Lenses: From Structural Analysis to the Identification of Pigments.
    Kim SH; Lee J; Jang YJ; Lee KB; Lee Y
    J Anal Methods Chem; 2020; 2020():6134627. PubMed ID: 32399310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface roughness and refractive index changes in contact lens induced by lens care systems.
    Lira M; Franco S; Vazquez-Dorrio JB; Real Oliveira ME; Costa MF
    Eye Contact Lens; 2014 May; 40(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 24756118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Corneal Erosion With Pigments Derived From a Cosmetic Contact Lens: A Case Report.
    Watanabe T; Uematsu M; Mohamed YH; Eguchi H; Imai S; Kitaoka T
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Sep; 44 Suppl 1():S322-S325. PubMed ID: 27533793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Morphological Properties of Siloxane-Hydrogel Contact Lens Surfaces.
    Stach S; Ţălu Ş; Trabattoni S; Tavazzi S; Głuchaczka A; Siek P; Zając J; Giovanzana S
    Curr Eye Res; 2017 Apr; 42(4):498-505. PubMed ID: 27610546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.