141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29570118)
21. Surface morphology of contact lenses probed with microscopy techniques.
Guryca V; Hobzová R; Prádný M; Sirc J; Michálek J
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Sep; 30(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 17507281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Examination of contact lens surfaces by Atomic Force Microscope (AFM).
Bhatia S; Goldberg EP; Enns JB
CLAO J; 1997 Oct; 23(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 9348451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative study of lens solutions' ability to remove tear constituents.
Cheung S; Lorentz H; Drolle E; Leonenko Z; Jones LW
Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Sep; 91(9):1045-61. PubMed ID: 25105687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Hydrogel contact lens-corneal interactions: a new mechanism for deposit formation and corneal injury.
Goldberg EP; Bhatia S; Enns JB
CLAO J; 1997 Oct; 23(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 9348448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of Cosmetics on the Physical Dimension and Optical Performance of Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses.
Luensmann D; Yu M; Yang J; Srinivasan S; Jones L
Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jul; 41(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 25723565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In Vitro Evaluation of Adhesion of Two Acanthamoeba Strains to Cosmetic Contact Lenses.
Bakay BB; Polat ZA
Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Nov; 44 Suppl 2():S241-S246. PubMed ID: 29210829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Analysis of intraocular lens surface properties with atomic force microscopy.
Lombardo M; De Santo MP; Lombardo G; Barberi R; Serrao S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Aug; 32(8):1378-84. PubMed ID: 16863979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of Pigment Distribution and Depth Analysis Methods for Decorative Soft Contact Lenses.
Nomura Y; Toida H; Fukui C; Kai S; Nakaoka R; Kato R; Uematsu M; Ono K; Kanai A; Haishima Y
Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Nov; 44 Suppl 2():S105-S112. PubMed ID: 28953599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Surface properties and wear performances of siloxane-hydrogel contact lenses.
Bettuelli M; Trabattoni S; Fagnola M; Tavazzi S; Introzzi L; Farris S
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2013 Nov; 101(8):1585-93. PubMed ID: 23559566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of wear and overwear on surface properties of etafilcon A contact lenses and adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Bruinsma GM; Rustema-Abbing M; de Vries J; Stegenga B; van der Mei HC; van der Linden ML; Hooymans JM; Busscher HJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Dec; 43(12):3646-53. PubMed ID: 12454031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bacterial adhesion to worn silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
Santos L; Rodrigues D; Lira M; Real Oliveira ME; Oliveira R; Vilar EY; Azeredo J
Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 85(7):520-5. PubMed ID: 18594343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of day and night wear on surface properties of silicone hydrogel contact lenses and bacterial adhesion.
Vermeltfoort PB; Rustema-Abbing M; de Vries J; Bruinsma GM; Busscher HJ; van der Linden ML; Hooymans JM; van der Mei HC
Cornea; 2006 Jun; 25(5):516-23. PubMed ID: 16783138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Corneal Swelling with Cosmetic etafilcon A Lenses versus No Lens Wear.
Moezzi AM; Varikooty J; Schulze M; Ngo W; Lorenz KO; Boree D; Jones LW
Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Jun; 93(6):619-28. PubMed ID: 26945176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Defining the physiologically normal coating and pathological deposit: an analysis of sulfur-containing moieties and pellicle thickness on hydrogel contact lenses.
Hart DE; Plociniak MP; Grimes GW
CLAO J; 1998 Apr; 24(2):85-101. PubMed ID: 9571268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Contact lens hydrophobicity and roughness effects on bacterial adhesion.
Giraldez MJ; Resua CG; Lira M; Oliveira ME; Magariños B; Toranzo AE; Yebra-Pimentel E
Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Jun; 87(6):E426-31. PubMed ID: 20375748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Soft contact lens cleaning: rub or no-rub?
Cho P; Cheng SY; Chan WY; Yip WK
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Jan; 29(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 19154280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Scanning electron microscopy of deposits remaining in soft contact lens polishing marks after cleaning.
Fowler SA; Gaertner KL
CLAO J; 1990; 16(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 2379309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical evaluation of long-term users of two contact lens care preservative systems.
Young G; Keir N; Hunt C; Woods CA
Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Mar; 35(2):50-8. PubMed ID: 19265324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Polymer-interaction driven diffusionof eyeshadow in soft contact lenses.
Tavazzi S; Rossi A; Picarazzi S; Ascagni M; Farris S; Borghesi A
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):335-339. PubMed ID: 28693972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Re: Atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy analysis of daily disposable limbal ring contact lenses.
Hart R; Rao A; Alvord L; Sentell K
Clin Exp Optom; 2016 May; 99(3):287. PubMed ID: 27192967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
