262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29570367)
1. Initial Experience of Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Biopsies of Tomosynthesis-Detected (2D Mammography and Ultrasound Occult) Architectural Distortions.
Patel BK; Covington M; Pizzitola VJ; Lorans R; Giurescu M; Eversman W; Lewin J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1395-1400. PubMed ID: 29570367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy of Architectural Distortion Without a Sonographic Correlate: A Retrospective Review.
Ambinder EB; Plotkin A; Euhus D; Mullen LA; Oluyemi E; Di Carlo P; Philip M; Panigrahi B; Cimino-Mathews A; Myers KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Oct; 217(4):845-854. PubMed ID: 33147055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital breast Tomosynthesis vacuum assisted biopsy for Tomosynthesis-detected Sonographically occult lesions.
Ariaratnam NS; Little ST; Whitley MA; Ferguson K
Clin Imaging; 2018; 47():4-8. PubMed ID: 28806573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience.
Partyka L; Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 24951218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of prone and upright, stereotactic, and tomosynthesis-guided biopsies with secondary analysis of ultrasound-occult architectural distortions.
Cohen EO; Korhonen KE; Sun J; Leung JWT
Eur Radiol; 2023 Sep; 33(9):6189-6203. PubMed ID: 37042980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experiences and comparison with prone stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Schrading S; Distelmaier M; Dirrichs T; Detering S; Brolund L; Strobel K; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):654-62. PubMed ID: 25386875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pathological outcome of sonographically occult architectural distortions (AD) visible only on digital breast tomosynthesis, and comparison with AD visible also on 2D mammography.
Linda A; Tarricone R; Londero V; Girometti R; Zuiani C
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Jan; 146():110075. PubMed ID: 34864616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital Mammography Stereotactic Biopsy versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided Biopsy: Differences in Biopsy Targets, Pathologic Results, and Discordance Rates.
Rochat CJ; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
Radiology; 2020 Mar; 294(3):518-527. PubMed ID: 31961261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tomosynthesis-detected Architectural Distortion: Management Algorithm with Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation.
Durand MA; Wang S; Hooley RJ; Raghu M; Philpotts LE
Radiographics; 2016; 36(2):311-21. PubMed ID: 26963448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Upright Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided versus Prone Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy.
Bahl M; Maunglay M; D'Alessandro HA; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2019 Feb; 290(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 30511909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative Tomosynthesis-guided Needle Localization of Mammographically and Sonographically Occult Breast Lesions.
Freer PE; Niell B; Rafferty EA
Radiology; 2015 May; 275(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 25575115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pathologic Outcomes of Architectural Distortion on Digital 2D Versus Tomosynthesis Mammography.
Bahl M; Lamb LR; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1162-1167. PubMed ID: 28834441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M
Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Suspicious Findings at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Occult to Conventional Digital Mammography: Imaging Features and Pathology Findings.
Ray KM; Turner E; Sickles EA; Joe BN
Breast J; 2015; 21(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 26148173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pathology results of architectural distortion on detected with digital breast tomosynthesis without definite sonographic correlate.
Walcott-Sapp S; Garreau J; Johnson N; Thomas KA
Am J Surg; 2019 May; 217(5):857-861. PubMed ID: 30777292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.
Kim G; Mikhael PG; Oseni TO; Bahl M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6089-6098. PubMed ID: 32591884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical performance of digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy: a single-institution experience in Japan.
Ido M; Saito M; Banno H; Ito Y; Goto M; Ando T; Kousaka J; Mouri Y; Fujii K; Imai T; Nakano S; Suzuki K; Murotani K
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Jan; 23(1):2. PubMed ID: 36604648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biologic Profiles of Invasive Breast Cancers Detected Only With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Kim JY; Kang HJ; Shin JK; Lee NK; Song YS; Nam KJ; Choo KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1411-1418. PubMed ID: 28834445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gamma Imaging-Guided Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsy: Initial Clinical Experience.
Brem RF; Mehta AK; Rapelyea JA; Akin EA; Bazoberry AM; Velasco CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Mar; 210(3):695-699. PubMed ID: 29323551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: A feasibility study.
Waldherr C; Berclaz G; Altermatt HJ; Cerny P; Keller P; Dietz U; Buser K; Ciriolo M; Sonnenschein MJ
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1582-9. PubMed ID: 26385802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
