229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29570370)
1. Screening Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Utilization Updates.
Boroumand G; Teberian I; Parker L; Rao VM; Levin DC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 May; 210(5):1092-1096. PubMed ID: 29570370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Effect of the Controversial US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations on the Use of Screening Mammography.
Sharpe RE; Levin DC; Parker L; Rao VM
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Nov; 13(11S):e58-e61. PubMed ID: 27814825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of the controversial US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations on the use of screening mammography.
Sharpe RE; Levin DC; Parker L; Rao VM
J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Jan; 10(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 23290669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recent trends in mammography utilization in the Medicare population: is there a cause for concern?
Rao VM; Levin DC; Parker L; Frangos AJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 May; 5(5):652-6. PubMed ID: 18442771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Resource Utilization and Clinical Outcomes Following Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography: Findings From a Learning Health System.
Alsheik NH; Dabbous F; Pohlman SK; Troeger KM; Gliklich RE; Donadio GM; Su Z; Menon V; Conant EF
Acad Radiol; 2019 May; 26(5):597-605. PubMed ID: 30057195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact on the recall rate of digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography in the screening setting. A double reading experience and review of the literature.
Carbonaro LA; Di Leo G; Clauser P; Trimboli RM; Verardi N; Fedeli MP; Girometti R; Tafà A; Bruscoli P; Saguatti G; Bazzocchi M; Sardanelli F
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):808-14. PubMed ID: 26971428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value Analysis of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening in a US Medicaid Population.
Miller JD; Bonafede MM; Herschorn SD; Pohlman SK; Troeger KA; Fajardo LL
J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Apr; 14(4):467-474.e5. PubMed ID: 28139412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Increased Cancer Detection Rate and Variations in the Recall Rate Resulting from Implementation of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis into a Population-based Screening Program.
Sharpe RE; Venkataraman S; Phillips J; Dialani V; Fein-Zachary VJ; Prakash S; Slanetz PJ; Mehta TS
Radiology; 2016 Mar; 278(3):698-706. PubMed ID: 26458206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Cost-Effectiveness of Using Private and Medicare Insurance in Community-Based Health Care Facilities.
Hunter SA; Morris C; Nelson K; Snyder BJ; Poulton TB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1171-1175. PubMed ID: 28177646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Mammography in Older Women.
Upneja A; Long JB; Aminawung JA; Kyanko KA; Kunst N; Xu X; Busch SH; Gross CP; Richman IB
J Gen Intern Med; 2022 Jun; 37(8):1870-1876. PubMed ID: 34595682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening Mammography Use Among Older Women Before and After the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations.
Chang CH; Bynum JP; Onega T; Colla CH; Lurie JD; Tosteson AN
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 Oct; 25(10):1030-1037. PubMed ID: 27427790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Implementation: Considerations for Emerging Breast Cancer Screening Bundled Payment Models.
Fleming MM; Hughes DR; Golding LP; McGinty GB; MacFarlane D; Duszak R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Jul; 16(7):902-907. PubMed ID: 30679104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening Digital Mammography Recall Rate: Does It Change with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Experience?
DiPrete O; Lourenco AP; Baird GL; Mainiero MB
Radiology; 2018 Mar; 286(3):838-844. PubMed ID: 29173123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diffusion of digital breast tomosynthesis among women in primary care: associations with insurance type.
Clark CR; Tosteson TD; Tosteson ANA; Onega T; Weiss JE; Harris KA; Haas JS
Cancer Med; 2017 May; 6(5):1102-1107. PubMed ID: 28378409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images versus Full-Field Digital Mammography for Population Screening: Outcomes from the Verona Screening Program.
Caumo F; Zorzi M; Brunelli S; Romanucci G; Rella R; Cugola L; Bricolo P; Fedato C; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 29237146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Akhtar AL; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 26496565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography in a Hybrid Screening Environment.
Giess CS; Pourjabbar S; Ip IK; Lacson R; Alper E; Khorasani R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):929-934. PubMed ID: 28639832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical Performance of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography Combined with Tomosynthesis in a Large Screening Population.
Aujero MP; Gavenonis SC; Benjamin R; Zhang Z; Holt JS
Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):70-76. PubMed ID: 28221096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
