BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29571266)

  • 1. Retrieval activates related words more than presentation.
    Hausman H; Rhodes MG
    Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1265-1280. PubMed ID: 29571266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect.
    Carpenter SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1547-52. PubMed ID: 21707217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differentiation of subsequent memory effects between retrieval practice and elaborative study.
    Liu Y; Rosburg T; Gao C; Weber C; Guo C
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Jul; 127():134-147. PubMed ID: 28552619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Elaborative retrieval: Do semantic mediators improve memory?
    Lehman M; Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1573-1591. PubMed ID: 26974674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The testing effect for mediator final test cues and related final test cues in online and laboratory experiments.
    Coppens LC; Verkoeijen PP; Bouwmeester S; Rikers RM
    BMC Psychol; 2016 May; 4(1):25. PubMed ID: 27240421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of retrieval mode and retrieval orientation in retrieval practice: insights from comparing recognition memory testing formats and restudying.
    Gao C; Rosburg T; Hou M; Li B; Xiao X; Guo C
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 16(6):977-990. PubMed ID: 27469235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hippocampal and brain stem activation during word retrieval after repeated and semantic encoding.
    Heckers S; Weiss AP; Alpert NM; Schacter DL
    Cereb Cortex; 2002 Sep; 12(9):900-7. PubMed ID: 12183389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
    Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The negative repetition effect.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1403-16. PubMed ID: 23421508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
    Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect.
    Carpenter SK; DeLosh EL
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 16752591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect.
    Weldon MS; Roediger HL; Challis BH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 2913461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrative and semantic relations equally alleviate age-related associative memory deficits.
    Badham SP; Estes Z; Maylor EA
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Mar; 27(1):141-52. PubMed ID: 21639644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval.
    Carpenter SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19857026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transfer of Test-Enhanced Learning.
    DiMarco D; Marmurek H
    Exp Psychol; 2022 May; 69(3):119-131. PubMed ID: 35975624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recognition during recall failure: Semantic feature matching as a mechanism for recognition of semantic cues when recall fails.
    Cleary AM; Ryals AJ; Wagner SR
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 26282623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Practicing more retrieval routes leads to greater memory retention.
    Zheng J; Zhang W; Li T; Liu Z; Luo L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():109-18. PubMed ID: 27270228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning from your mistakes: does it matter if you're out in left foot, I mean field?
    Cyr AA; Anderson ND
    Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1281-1290. PubMed ID: 29659332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inhibition and retrieval of facts in young and older adults.
    Gómez-Ariza CJ; Pelegrina S; Lechuga MT; Suárez A; Bajo MT
    Exp Aging Res; 2009; 35(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 19173103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toward an episodic context account of retrieval-based learning: dissociating retrieval practice and elaboration.
    Lehman M; Smith MA; Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1787-94. PubMed ID: 24797442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.