109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29571900)
1. Invitation letter with a standardized form is a reliable tool to exclude increased risk patients from organized fecal immunological testing-based colorectal cancer screening program.
Sportes A; Catajar N; Charles S; Bejou B; Mary F; Sabaté JM; Le Mab G; Benamouzig R
Dig Liver Dis; 2018 Dec; 50(12):1339-1342. PubMed ID: 29571900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interval Colorectal Cancer Incidence Among Subjects Undergoing Multiple Rounds of Fecal Immunochemical Testing.
van der Vlugt M; Grobbee EJ; Bossuyt PMM; Bos A; Bongers E; Spijker W; Kuipers EJ; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E
Gastroenterology; 2017 Aug; 153(2):439-447.e2. PubMed ID: 28483499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Many participants in fecal occult blood test population screening have a higher-than-average risk for colorectal cancer.
Worthley DL; Smith A; Bampton PA; Cole SR; Young GP
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1079-83. PubMed ID: 16957514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Colorectal cancer screening in a low-incidence area: general invitation versus family risk targeting: a comparative study from Montenegro.
Panic N; Rösch T; Smolovic B; Radunovic M; Bulajic M; Pavlovic-Markovic A; Krivokapic Z; Djuranovic S; Ille T; Bulajic M
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Oct; 27(10):1222-5. PubMed ID: 26067224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Population-based screening for colorectal cancer using an immunochemical faecal occult blood test: a comparison of two invitation strategies.
Van Roosbroeck S; Hoeck S; Van Hal G
Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 22560885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adding family history to faecal immunochemical testing increases the detection of advanced neoplasia in a colorectal cancer screening programme.
Kallenberg FG; Vleugels JL; de Wijkerslooth TR; Stegeman I; Stoop EM; van Leerdam ME; Kuipers EJ; Bossuyt PM; Dekker E
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2016 Jul; 44(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 27170502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Colon Cancer Screening - Is It Time Yet?
Bhurgri H; Samiullah S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2017 Jun; 27(6):327-328. PubMed ID: 28689518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient-Initiated Colonoscopy Scheduling Effectively Increases Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence.
Mankaney G; Rizk M; Sarvepalli S; Bongorno J; Garber A; Lopez R; McMichael J; Burke CA
Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(9):2497-2504. PubMed ID: 30877609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outreach invitations for FIT and colonoscopy improve colorectal cancer screening rates: A randomized controlled trial in a safety-net health system.
Singal AG; Gupta S; Tiro JA; Skinner CS; McCallister K; Sanders JM; Bishop WP; Agrawal D; Mayorga CA; Ahn C; Loewen AC; Santini NO; Halm EA
Cancer; 2016 Feb; 122(3):456-63. PubMed ID: 26535565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of screening colonoscopy on outcomes in colorectal cancer.
Matsuda T; Ono A; Kakugawa Y; Matsumoto M; Saito Y
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Oct; 45(10):900-5. PubMed ID: 26254299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: a survey among Thai general surgeons.
Lohsiriwat V; Lohsiriwat D; Thavichaigarn P;
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2009; 10(3):467-70. PubMed ID: 19640193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Organized colorectal cancer screening in Serbia - the first round within 2013-2014.
Banković Lazarević D; Krivokapić Z; Barišić G; Jovanović V; Ilić D; Veljković M
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Apr; 73(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 29309104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening colonoscopy and fecal occult blood testing practice patterns: a population-based survey of gastroenterologists.
Rossi F; Sosa JA; Aslanian HR
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008; 42(10):1089-94. PubMed ID: 18936643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Budget Impact Analysis of Against Colorectal Cancer In Our Neighborhoods (ACCION): A Successful Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program for a Medically Underserved Minority Population.
Kim B; Lairson DR; Chung TH; Kim J; Shokar NK
Value Health; 2017 Jun; 20(6):809-818. PubMed ID: 28577699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal use of colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical test for population-based colorectal cancer screening: a cost-effectiveness analysis using Japanese data.
Sekiguchi M; Igarashi A; Matsuda T; Matsumoto M; Sakamoto T; Nakajima T; Kakugawa Y; Yamamoto S; Saito H; Saito Y
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2016 Feb; 46(2):116-25. PubMed ID: 26685321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Compliance rate of screening colonoscopy and its associated factors among high-risk populations of colorectal cancer in urban China].
Chen HD; Li N; Ren JS; Shi JF; Zhang YM; Zou SM; Zheng ZX; Zhang K; Dai M
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 52(3):231-237. PubMed ID: 29973000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Need for an Integrated Patient Navigation Pathway to Improve Access to Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Testing: A Safety-Net Hospital Experience.
Thamarasseril S; Bhuket T; Chan C; Liu B; Wong RJ
J Community Health; 2017 Jun; 42(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 27796633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of stratifying by family history in colorectal cancer screening programs.
Goede SL; Rabeneck L; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Zauber AG; Paszat LF; Hoch JS; Yong JH; van Hees F; Tinmouth J; van Ballegooijen M
Int J Cancer; 2015 Sep; 137(5):1119-27. PubMed ID: 25663135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
