These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29572338)
1. Institute of Medical Ethics Guidelines for confirmation of appointment, promotion and recognition of UK bioethics and medical ethics researchers. Frith L; Hooper C; Camporesi S; Douglas T; Smajdor A; Nottingham E; Fritz Z; Ekberg M; Huxtable R; J Med Ethics; 2018 May; 44(5):289-291. PubMed ID: 29572338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The blossoming of bioethics at NIH. Emanuel EJ Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1998 Dec; 8(4):455-66. PubMed ID: 11657322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Challenges and opportunities for ELSI early career researchers. Bell J; Ancillotti M; Coathup V; Coy S; Rigter T; Tatum T; Grewal J; Akcesme FB; Brkić J; Causevic-Ramosevac A; Milovanovic G; Nobile M; Pavlidis C; Finlay T; Kaye J; BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Jul; 17(1):37. PubMed ID: 27390930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Snapshots of five clinical ethics committees in the UK. Szeremeta M; Dawson J; Manning D; Watson AR; Wright MM; Notcutt W; Lancaster R J Med Ethics; 2001 Apr; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i9-17. PubMed ID: 11314616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Author, contributor or just a signer? A quantitative analysis of authorship trends in the field of bioethics. Borry P; Schotsmans P; Dierickx K Bioethics; 2006 Aug; 20(4):213-20. PubMed ID: 17044155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conflict of interest and AJOB. Carroll KA; McGee G Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12230839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. 2014 International Bioethics Forum between UK and China and the professional development of bioethics in China. En-Chang L; Meng L; Jia Z; Ping L Bioethics; 2014 Mar; 28(3):ii-iv. PubMed ID: 24588449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The ethics of genetic screening: the first report of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics: another personal view. Shapiro D J Med Ethics; 1994 Sep; 20(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 7996566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Health care ethics consultation: nature, goals, and competencies. A position paper from the Society for Health and Human Values-Society for Bioethics Consultation Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation. Aulisio MP; Arnold RM; Youngner SJ Ann Intern Med; 2000 Jul; 133(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 10877742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An ongoing conversation: the Task Force report and bioethics consultation. Aulisio MP; Arnold RM; Youngner SJ J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 11645165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The heterogeneity of clinical ethics: the state of the field as reflected in the Encyclopedia of Bioethics. Koczwara B; Madigan TJ J Med Philos; 1997 Feb; 22(1):75-88. PubMed ID: 9095463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Woodstock of bioethics. Marker R Hum Life Rev; 1995; 21(1):35-52. PubMed ID: 11653007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The quality of bioethics debate: implications for clinical ethics committees. Williamson L J Med Ethics; 2008 May; 34(5):357-60. PubMed ID: 18448716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychiatry and bioethics. An exploration of the relationship. Steinberg MD Psychosomatics; 1997; 38(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 9217401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role responsibilities in clinical bioethics: the dialectic of consultation -- comments on the case presented by Barbara Springer Edwards. Dagi TF J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 11642823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The bioethicist as author: the medical ethics case as rhetorical device. Chambers TS Lit Med; 1994; 13(1):60-78. PubMed ID: 8007731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical bioethics at NIH: history and a new vision. Fletcher JC Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1995 Dec; 5(4):355-64. PubMed ID: 10153761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Do committees ru(i)n the bio-political culture? On the democratic legitimacy of bioethics committees. Friele MB Bioethics; 2003 Aug; 17(4):301-18. PubMed ID: 14567389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical ethicists are a new source of second opinions. Malcolm AH N Y Times Web; 1986 Jul; ():E24. PubMed ID: 11646170 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]