222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29572339)
1.
Smith MK; Carver T
J Med Ethics; 2018 Jun; 44(6):384-388. PubMed ID: 29572339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Informed Consent to Medical Treatment Post-Montgomery: Causation and Coincidence.
Turton G
Med Law Rev; 2019 Feb; 27(1):108-134. PubMed ID: 29878279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Think of the Children: Liability for Non-Disclosure of Information Post-Montgomery.
Cave E; Purshouse C
Med Law Rev; 2020 May; 28(2):270-292. PubMed ID: 31504791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Innovation, informed consent, health research and the Supreme Court: Montgomery v Lanarkshire - a brave new world?
Mchale JV
Health Econ Policy Law; 2017 Oct; 12(4):435-452. PubMed ID: 28446256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Between the Reasonable and the Particular: Deflating Autonomy in the Legal Regulation of Informed Consent to Medical Treatment.
Dunn M; Fulford KWM; Herring J; Handa A
Health Care Anal; 2019 Jun; 27(2):110-127. PubMed ID: 29961214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Not so new directions in the law of consent? Examining Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board.
Farrell AM; Brazier M
J Med Ethics; 2016 Feb; 42(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 26685149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The cost of consent: why healthcare providers must be compliant with the Montgomery principles.
Birch N; Todd NV
Bone Joint J; 2020 May; 102-B(5):550-555. PubMed ID: 32349593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ionising radiation risk disclosure: When should radiographers assume a duty to inform?
Younger CWE; Douglas C; Warren-Forward H
Radiography (Lond); 2018 May; 24(2):146-150. PubMed ID: 29605112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient autonomy within real or valid consent: Samira Kohli's case.
Subramani S
Indian J Med Ethics; 2017; 2(3):184-189. PubMed ID: 28195536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Negligence in securing informed consent and medical malpractice.
Perry C
J Med Humanit Bioeth; 1988; 9(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 10296750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Why the British courts rejected the American doctrine of informed consent (and what British physicians should do about it).
Annas GJ
Am J Public Health; 1984 Nov; 74(11):1286-8. PubMed ID: 6496827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The changing paradigm of the doctor-patient relationship: Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board and developments in the 'duty to warn'.
Sizer L; Arnold P
N Z Med J; 2016 Jan; 129(1429):71-6. PubMed ID: 26914302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Duty to warn of risks moves to a prudent patient approach.
Griffith R
Br J Nurs; 2015 Apr 9-22; 24(7):408-9. PubMed ID: 25849239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Has informed consent finally arrived in Australia? A comment on the law following the decision of the High Court of Australia in Rogers v. Whitaker.
Pincus RC
Med J Aust; 1993 Jul; 159(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 8316108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Procreative torts: enhancing the common-law protection for reproductive autonomy.
Northern KS
Univ Ill Law Rev; 1998; 1998(2):489-546. PubMed ID: 12774812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 'Montgomery consent': decision of the UK Supreme Court. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [20151. [2015] UKSC 11; [2015] WLR 768.
Beckett H; Radford J
Pract Midwife; 2016 Jun; 19(6):27-9. PubMed ID: 27451489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 'Bolam' to 'Montgomery' is result of evolutionary change of medical practice towards 'patient-centred care'.
Lee A
Postgrad Med J; 2017 Jan; 93(1095):46-50. PubMed ID: 27466410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Informed consent and the law--an English legal perspective.
Hassan M
Dig Dis; 2008; 26(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 18600010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent to medical treatment--the Israeli experience.
Weil Z
Med Law; 1998; 17(2):243-61. PubMed ID: 9757739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women.
Rossiter GP
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 May; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7677674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
