161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29572510)
1. Same habitat types but different use: evidence of context-dependent habitat selection in roe deer across populations.
William G; Jean-Michel G; Sonia S; Christophe B; Atle M; Nicolas M; Maryline P; Clément C
Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):5102. PubMed ID: 29572510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Woodland features determining home range size of roe deer.
Lovari S; Serrao G; Mori E
Behav Processes; 2017 Jul; 140():115-120. PubMed ID: 28442429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Seasonality, weather and climate affect home range size in roe deer across a wide latitudinal gradient within Europe.
Morellet N; Bonenfant C; Börger L; Ossi F; Cagnacci F; Heurich M; Kjellander P; Linnell JD; Nicoloso S; Sustr P; Urbano F; Mysterud A
J Anim Ecol; 2013 Nov; 82(6):1326-39. PubMed ID: 23855883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Movement is the glue connecting home ranges and habitat selection.
Van Moorter B; Rolandsen CM; Basille M; Gaillard JM
J Anim Ecol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 25980987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Between-population differences in the genetic and maternal components of body mass in roe deer.
Quéméré E; Gaillard JM; Galan M; Vanpé C; David I; Pellerin M; Kjellander P; Hewison AJM; Pemberton JM
BMC Evol Biol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):39. PubMed ID: 29592799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental evidence for density-dependence of home-range size in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.): a comparison of two long-term studies.
Kjellander P; Hewison AJ; Liberg O; Angibault JM; Bideau E; Cargnelutti B
Oecologia; 2004 May; 139(3):478-85. PubMed ID: 15007727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Density-dependent responses of fawn cohort body mass in two contrasting roe deer populations.
Kjellander P; Gaillard JM; Hewison AJ
Oecologia; 2006 Jan; 146(4):521-30. PubMed ID: 16341553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microbiota and Nutrient Portraits of European Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus) Rumen Contents in Characteristic Southern German Habitats.
Dahl SA; Seifert J; Camarinha-Silva A; Cheng YC; Hernández-Arriaga A; Hudler M; Windisch W; König A
Microb Ecol; 2023 Nov; 86(4):3082-3096. PubMed ID: 37875737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Habitat selection and risk of predation: re-colonization by lynx had limited impact on habitat selection by roe deer.
Samelius G; Andrén H; Kjellander P; Liberg O
PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75469. PubMed ID: 24069419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Satellite-based habitat monitoring reveals long-term dynamics of deer habitat in response to forest disturbances.
Oeser J; Heurich M; Senf C; Pflugmacher D; Kuemmerle T
Ecol Appl; 2021 Apr; 31(3):e2269. PubMed ID: 33277745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Temporal scales, trade-offs, and functional responses in red deer habitat selection.
Godvik IM; Loe LE; Vik JO; Veiberg V; Langvatn R; Mysterud A
Ecology; 2009 Mar; 90(3):699-710. PubMed ID: 19341140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantifying spatial habitat loss from hydrocarbon development through assessing habitat selection patterns of mule deer.
Northrup JM; Anderson CR; Wittemyer G
Glob Chang Biol; 2015 Nov; 21(11):3961-70. PubMed ID: 26264447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter-specific synchrony of two contrasting ungulates: wild boar (Sus scrofa) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus).
Mysterud A; Tryjanowski P; Panek M; Pettorelli N; Stenseth NC
Oecologia; 2007 Mar; 151(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 17102995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can highway tunnel constructıon change the habitat selection of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus Linnaeus, 1758)?
Evcin Ö
Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Nov; 195(12):1410. PubMed ID: 37922036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High red deer density depresses body mass of roe deer fawns.
Richard E; Gaillard JM; Saïd S; Hamann JL; Klein F
Oecologia; 2010 May; 163(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 20033821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A slow life in hell or a fast life in heaven: demographic analyses of contrasting roe deer populations.
Nilsen EB; Gaillard JM; Andersen R; Odden J; Delorme D; van Laere G; Linnell JD
J Anim Ecol; 2009 May; 78(3):585-94. PubMed ID: 19379139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Habitat quality influences population distribution, individual space use and functional responses in habitat selection by a large herbivore.
Bjørneraas K; Herfindal I; Solberg EJ; Sæther BE; van Moorter B; Rolandsen CM
Oecologia; 2012 Jan; 168(1):231-43. PubMed ID: 21766188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lifetime reproductive success and composition of the home range in a large herbivore.
McLoughlin PD; Gaillard JM; Boyce MS; Bonenfant C; Messier F; Duncan P; Delorme D; Van Moorter B; Saïd S; Klein F
Ecology; 2007 Dec; 88(12):3192-201. PubMed ID: 18229853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of vegetation type differences induced by human disturbance on the nutrition strategy and gut microbiota of Siberian roe deer.
Yuan ZA; Zhong LQ; Du HR; Feng JN; Liu XX; Yuan HY; Guo JH; Liu P; Zhang MH
Mol Ecol; 2023 May; 32(10):2534-2550. PubMed ID: 36349836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Habitat suitability model with maximum entropy approach for European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in the Black Sea Region.
Evcin O; Kucuk O; Akturk E
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Oct; 191(11):669. PubMed ID: 31650357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
