These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29572594)

  • 1. Blood pool and tissue phase patient motion effects on
    Lee BC; Moody JB; Poitrasson-Rivière A; Melvin AC; Weinberg RL; Corbett JR; Ficaro EP; Murthy VL
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1918-1929. PubMed ID: 29572594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated dynamic motion correction using normalized gradient fields for
    Lee BC; Moody JB; Poitrasson-Rivière A; Melvin AC; Weinberg RL; Corbett JR; Murthy VL; Ficaro EP
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 27(6):1982-1998. PubMed ID: 30406609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimization of temporal sampling for
    Lee BC; Moody JB; Weinberg RL; Corbett JR; Ficaro EP; Murthy VL
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 24(5):1517-1529. PubMed ID: 28508271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient motion effects on the quantification of regional myocardial blood flow with dynamic PET imaging.
    Hunter CR; Klein R; Beanlands RS; deKemp RA
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1829. PubMed ID: 27036580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dependency of cardiac rubidium-82 imaging quantitative measures on age, gender, vascular territory, and software in a cardiovascular normal population.
    Sunderland JJ; Pan XB; Declerck J; Menda Y
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2015 Feb; 22(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 25294436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of prompt gamma compensation on myocardial blood flow measurements with rubidium-82 dynamic PET.
    Armstrong IS; Memmott MJ; Tonge CM; Arumugam P
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 25(2):596-605. PubMed ID: 27624818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simplified quantification of
    Chang CY; Hung GU; Hsu B; Yang BH; Chang CW; Hu LH; Huang WS; Wang HE; Wu TC; Liu RS
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 27(3):819-828. PubMed ID: 30324328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimization of SPECT Measurement of Myocardial Blood Flow with Corrections for Attenuation, Motion, and Blood Binding Compared with PET.
    Wells RG; Marvin B; Poirier M; Renaud J; deKemp RA; Ruddy TD
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Dec; 58(12):2013-2019. PubMed ID: 28611245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimally Repeatable Kinetic Model Variant for Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements with
    Ocneanu AF; deKemp RA; Renaud JM; Adler A; Beanlands RS; Klein R
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2017; 2017():6810626. PubMed ID: 28293274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison and prognostic validation of multiple methods of quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb PET.
    Murthy VL; Lee BC; Sitek A; Naya M; Moody J; Polavarapu V; Ficaro EP; Di Carli MF
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Dec; 55(12):1952-8. PubMed ID: 25429160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two software systems for quantification of myocardial blood flow in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
    Yalcin H; Valenta I; Zhao M; Tahari A; Lu DY; Higuchi T; Yalcin F; Kucukler N; Soleimanifard Y; Zhou Y; Pomper MG; Abraham TP; Tsui B; Lodge MA; Schindler TH; Roselle Abraham M
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1243-1253. PubMed ID: 29359273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of temporal sampling protocols on myocardial blood flow measurements using Rubidium-82 PET.
    Koenders SS; van Dijk JD; Jager PL; Mouden M; Tegelaar AG; Slump CH; van Dalen JA
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1729-1741. PubMed ID: 33655444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No need for frame-wise attenuation correction in dynamic Rubidium-82 PET for myocardial blood flow quantification.
    van Dijk JD; Jager PL; Ottervanger JP; Slump CH; van Dalen JA
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 26(3):738-745. PubMed ID: 30790203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feasibility of myocardial flow reserve prediction without the use of dynamic data from myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography.
    Hashimoto H; Fukushima Y; Kumita SI; Tomiyama T; Kiriyama T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Aug; 34(8):1323-1329. PubMed ID: 29556942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved myocardial blood flow estimation with residual activity correction and motion correction in
    Otaki Y; Van Kriekinge SD; Wei CC; Kavanagh P; Singh A; Parekh T; Di Carli M; Maddahi J; Sitek A; Buckley C; Berman DS; Slomka PJ
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 May; 49(6):1881-1893. PubMed ID: 34967914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the prognostic value of impaired stress myocardial blood flow, myocardial flow reserve, and myocardial flow capacity on low-dose Rubidium-82 SiPM PET/CT.
    Dietz M; Kamani CH; Allenbach G; Rubimbura V; Fournier S; Dunet V; Treglia G; Nicod Lalonde M; Schaefer N; Eeckhout E; Muller O; Prior JO
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2023 Aug; 30(4):1385-1395. PubMed ID: 36574175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging and [
    Everaars H; van Diemen PA; Bom MJ; Schumacher SP; de Winter RW; van de Ven PM; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Hofman MBM; van der Geest RJ; Götte MJ; van Rossum AC; Nijveldt R; Danad I; Driessen RS; Knaapen P
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Jul; 47(7):1688-1697. PubMed ID: 31822958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility and operator variability of myocardial blood flow and reserve measurements with ⁹⁹mTc-sestamibi quantitative dynamic SPECT/CT imaging.
    Klein R; Hung GU; Wu TC; Huang WS; Li D; deKemp RA; Hsu B
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1075-88. PubMed ID: 25280761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Added prognostic value of myocardial blood flow quantitation in rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging.
    Farhad H; Dunet V; Bachelard K; Allenbach G; Kaufmann PA; Prior JO
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 14(12):1203-10. PubMed ID: 23660750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of myocardial blood flow by CZT-SPECT with motion correction and comparison with
    Otaki Y; Manabe O; Miller RJH; Manrique A; Nganoa C; Roth N; Berman DS; Germano G; Slomka PJ; Agostini D
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Aug; 28(4):1477-1486. PubMed ID: 31452085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.