These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29572695)

  • 1. The effect of swim-up and gradient sperm preparation techniques on deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) fragmentation in subfertile patients.
    Oguz Y; Guler I; Erdem A; Mutlu MF; Gumuslu S; Oktem M; Bozkurt N; Erdem M
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Jun; 35(6):1083-1089. PubMed ID: 29572695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative efficacy of density gradient and swim-up methods of semen preparation in intrauterine insemination cycles.
    Butt F; Chohan MA
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Aug; 66(8):932-7. PubMed ID: 27524522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.
    Boomsma CM; Heineman MJ; Cohlen BJ; Farquhar C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD004507. PubMed ID: 15266536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential impact of four sperm preparation techniques on sperm motility, morphology, DNA fragmentation, acrosome status, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial activity: A prospective study.
    Raad G; Bakos HW; Bazzi M; Mourad Y; Fakih F; Shayya S; Mchantaf L; Fakih C
    Andrology; 2021 Sep; 9(5):1549-1559. PubMed ID: 33999521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.
    Boomsma CM; Heineman MJ; Cohlen BJ; Farquhar C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Oct; (4):CD004507. PubMed ID: 17943816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microfluidic sorting selects sperm for clinical use with reduced DNA damage compared to density gradient centrifugation with swim-up in split semen samples.
    Quinn MM; Jalalian L; Ribeiro S; Ona K; Demirci U; Cedars MI; Rosen MP
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1388-1393. PubMed ID: 30007319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of sperm preparation techniques on sperm survivability and DNA fragmentation.
    Le MT; Dang HNT; Nguyen TV; Nguyen TTT; Nguyen QHV; Cao NT
    J Int Med Res; 2022 May; 50(5):3000605221097492. PubMed ID: 35545843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of different sperm preparation methods and incubation time on the sperm DNA fragmentation.
    Zhang XD; Chen MY; Gao Y; Han W; Liu DY; Huang GN
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2011 Sep; 14(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 21859363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The gradient technique improves success rates in intrauterine insemination cycles of unexplained subfertile couples when compared to swim up technique; a prospective randomized study.
    Karamahmutoglu H; Erdem A; Erdem M; Mutlu MF; Bozkurt N; Oktem M; Ercan DD; Gumuslu S
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2014 Sep; 31(9):1139-45. PubMed ID: 25026953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sperm-preparation techniques for men with normal and abnormal semen analysis. A comparison.
    Erel CT; Senturk LM; Irez T; Ercan L; Elter K; Colgar U; Ertungealp E
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov; 45(11):917-22. PubMed ID: 11127104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrospective comparison of the semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination: Swim-up versus density gradient method.
    Çil N; Kabukçu C; Çabuş Ü; Turan T; Mete GA
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar; 51(3):102321. PubMed ID: 35063717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of swim-up method on the recovery of spermatozoa from different types of semen samples.
    Adiga SK; Kumar P
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2001 Mar; 18(3):160-4. PubMed ID: 11411432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved sperm recovery rate with Percoll gradient method in intrauterine insemination.
    Huang HY; Lai YM; Lee CL; Chang MY; Chang SY; Soong YK
    Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1996 Mar; 19(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 8935371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semen processing by density gradient centrifugation does not improve sperm apoptotic deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation rates.
    Stevanato J; Bertolla RP; Barradas V; Spaine DM; Cedenho AP; Ortiz V
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):889-90. PubMed ID: 17481620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized comparison of the methods of sperm preparation for intrauterine insemination.
    Dodson WC; Moessner J; Miller J; Legro RS; Gnatuk CL
    Fertil Steril; 1998 Sep; 70(3):574-5. PubMed ID: 9757895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of swim-up versus density gradient centrifugation in improving sperm deformity rate and DNA fragmentation index in semen samples from teratozoospermic patients.
    Xue X; Wang WS; Shi JZ; Zhang SL; Zhao WQ; Shi WH; Guo BZ; Qin Z
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2014 Sep; 31(9):1161-6. PubMed ID: 25015033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two sperm processing techniques for low complexity assisted fertilization: sperm washing followed by swim-up and discontinuous density gradient centrifugation.
    Fácio CL; Previato LF; Machado-Paula LA; Matheus PC; Araújo E
    JBRA Assist Reprod; 2016 Dec; 20(4):206-211. PubMed ID: 28050954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of semen processing technique on human sperm DNA integrity.
    Zini A; Finelli A; Phang D; Jarvi K
    Urology; 2000 Dec; 56(6):1081-4. PubMed ID: 11113773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DNA fragmentation in concert with the simultaneous assessment of cell viability in a subfertile population: establishing thresholds of normality both before and after density gradient centrifugation.
    Punjabi U; Van Mulders H; Goovaerts I; Peeters K; Roelant E; De Neubourg D
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Jul; 36(7):1413-1421. PubMed ID: 31089933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Value of the sperm chromatin dispersion test in predicting pregnancy outcome in intrauterine insemination: a blind prospective study.
    Muriel L; Meseguer M; Fernández JL; Alvarez J; Remohí J; Pellicer A; Garrido N
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Mar; 21(3):738-44. PubMed ID: 16311292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.