These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29572716)

  • 1. Comparison of single-coil lead versus dual-coil lead of implantable cardioverter defibrillator on lead-related venous complications in a canine model.
    Yu Z; Wu Y; Qin S; Wang J; Chen X; Chen R; Su Y; Ge J
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2018 Jul; 52(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 29572716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Novel intravascular defibrillator: defibrillation thresholds of intravascular cardioverter-defibrillator compared to conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in a canine model.
    Sanders WE; Richey MW; Malkin RA; Masson SC; Ransbury TJ; Urtz MW; Ideker RE
    Heart Rhythm; 2011 Feb; 8(2):288-92. PubMed ID: 21034853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incidence of venous obstruction following insertion of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. A study of systematic contrast venography on patients presenting for their first elective ICD generator replacement.
    Lickfett L; Bitzen A; Arepally A; Nasir K; Wolpert C; Jeong KM; Krause U; Schimpf R; Lewalter T; Calkins H; Jung W; Lüderitz B
    Europace; 2004 Jan; 6(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 14697723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness and safety of transvenous extraction of single- versus dual-coil implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads at single-center experience.
    Ząbek A; Boczar K; Dębski M; Ulman M; Pfitzner R; Musiał R; Lelakowski J; Małecka B
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jul; 98(30):e16548. PubMed ID: 31348275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implantable intravascular defibrillator: defibrillation thresholds of an intravascular cardioverter-defibrillator compared with those of a conventional ICD in humans.
    Neuzil P; Reddy VY; Merkely B; Geller L; Molnar L; Bednarek J; Bartus K; Richey M; Bsee TJ; Sanders WE
    Heart Rhythm; 2014 Feb; 11(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 24144885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transvenous extraction of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads under advisory--a comparison of Riata, Sprint Fidelis, and non-recalled implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads.
    Brunner MP; Cronin EM; Jacob J; Duarte VE; Tarakji KG; Martin DO; Callahan T; Borek PP; Cantillon DJ; Niebauer MJ; Saliba WI; Kanj M; Wazni O; Baranowski B; Wilkoff BL
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 Oct; 10(10):1444-50. PubMed ID: 23816440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laser lead extraction allows for safe and effective removal of single- and dual-coil implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads: A single-centre experience over 12 years.
    Pecha S; Yildirim Y; Gosau N; Aydin MA; Willems S; Treede H; Reichenspurner H; Hakmi S
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Jan; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 27624353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No benefit of a dual coil over a single coil ICD lead: evidence from the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial.
    Aoukar PS; Poole JE; Johnson GW; Anderson J; Hellkamp AS; Mark DB; Lee KL; Bardy GH
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 Jul; 10(7):970-6. PubMed ID: 23562699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual- versus single-coil implantable defibrillator leads: review of the literature.
    Neuzner J; Carlsson J
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2012 Apr; 101(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 22231644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Venous thrombosis and stenosis after implantation of pacemakers and defibrillators.
    Rozmus G; Daubert JP; Huang DT; Rosero S; Hall B; Francis C
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2005 Jun; 13(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 15976973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of laser lead extraction sheath in the presence of supra-cardiac occlusion of the central veins for cardiac implantable electronic device lead upgrade or revision.
    Al-Maisary S; Romano G; Karck M; De Simone R; Kremer J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251829. PubMed ID: 33989335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simultaneous lead traction from above and below: A novel technique to reduce the risk of superior vena cava injury during transvenous lead extraction.
    Schaller RD; Sadek MM; Cooper JM
    Heart Rhythm; 2018 Nov; 15(11):1655-1663. PubMed ID: 29803849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Chronic transvenous pacemaker/implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads implantation induced pathological changes].
    Li Y; Dykoski R; Li J
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2015 May; 43(5):423-7. PubMed ID: 26419988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Major predictors of fibrous adherences in transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction.
    Segreti L; Di Cori A; Soldati E; Zucchelli G; Viani S; Paperini L; De Lucia R; Coluccia G; Valsecchi S; Bongiorni MG
    Heart Rhythm; 2014 Dec; 11(12):2196-201. PubMed ID: 25111324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utilization trends and clinical outcomes in patients implanted with a single- vs a dual-coil implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead: Insights from the ALTITUDE Study.
    Hsu JC; Saxon LA; Jones PW; Wehrenberg S; Marcus GM
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Aug; 12(8):1770-5. PubMed ID: 25916569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-coil and dual-coil defibrillator leads and association with clinical outcomes in a complete Danish nationwide ICD cohort.
    Larsen JM; Hjortshøj SP; Nielsen JC; Johansen JB; Petersen HH; Haarbo J; Johansen MB; Thøgersen AM
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Mar; 13(3):706-12. PubMed ID: 26593333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Should Single-Coil Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads Be Used in all Patients?
    Almehmadi F; Manlucu J
    Card Electrophysiol Clin; 2018 Mar; 10(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 29428142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multicentre comparison Of shock efficacy using single-vs. Dual-coil lead systems and Anodal vs. cathodaL polarITY defibrillation in patients undergoing transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. The MODALITY study.
    Baccillieri MS; Gasparini G; Benacchio L; Zorzi A; Marras E; Zerbo F; Tomasi L; Vaccari D; Pastore G; Bonanno C; Molon G; Zanotto G; Fusco A; Carasi M; Zorzi A; Calzolari V; Ignatiuk B; Cannas S; Vaglio A; Al Bunni M; Pedrini A; Olivieri A; Rampazzo R; Minicuci N; Corrado D; Verlato R
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Jun; 43(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 25690336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimization of superior vena cava coil position and usage for transvenous defibrillation.
    Gold M; Val-Mejias J; Leman RB; Tummala R; Goyal S; Kluger J; Kroll M; Oza A
    Heart Rhythm; 2008 Mar; 5(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 18313597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cable externalization at the proximal portion of the superior vena cava coil in Riata implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads.
    Katsuki T; Furusho H; Kusayama T; Takashima S; Kato T; Murai H; Usui S; Kaneko S; Takamura M
    J Cardiol Cases; 2017 Jan; 15(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 30524571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.