These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29572848)

  • 1. Experimental validation of absolute SPECT/CT quantification for response monitoring in breast cancer.
    Collarino A; Pereira Arias-Bouda LM; Valdés Olmos RA; van der Tol P; Dibbets-Schneider P; de Geus-Oei LF; van Velden FHP
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2143-2153. PubMed ID: 29572848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phantom Validation of Tc-99m Absolute Quantification in a SPECT/CT Commercial Device.
    Gnesin S; Leite Ferreira P; Malterre J; Laub P; Prior JO; Verdun FR
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2016; 2016():4360371. PubMed ID: 28096891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy Assessment of SUV Measurements in SPECT/CT: A Phantom Study.
    Halim F; Yahya H; Jaafar KN; Mansor S
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2021 Sep; 49(3):250-255. PubMed ID: 33722927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitatively accurate activity measurements with a dedicated cardiac SPECT camera: Physical phantom experiments.
    Pourmoghaddas A; Wells RG
    Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):44. PubMed ID: 26745898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative accuracy of clinical 99mTc SPECT/CT using ordered-subset expectation maximization with 3-dimensional resolution recovery, attenuation, and scatter correction.
    Zeintl J; Vija AH; Yahil A; Hornegger J; Kuwert T
    J Nucl Med; 2010 Jun; 51(6):921-8. PubMed ID: 20484423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of reconstruction parameters on quantitative bone SPECT imaging: A novel thoracic spine phantom study.
    Hishikawa M; Matsutomo N; Yamamoto T
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22 Suppl 2():140. PubMed ID: 31802053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantify total activity by volume-of-interest expansion with clinical SPECT/CT systems, a phantom study.
    Bian J; James JR; Wagner R; Halama J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jan; 24(1):e13828. PubMed ID: 36347052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fluctuation of quantitative values on acquisition time and the reconstruction conditions in 99mTc-SPECT.
    Tsujimoto M; Shirakawa S; Teramoto A; Ishiguro M; Nakane K; Ida Y; Toyama H
    Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jul; 39(7):601-609. PubMed ID: 29893748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Towards standardization of absolute SPECT/CT quantification: a multi-center and multi-vendor phantom study.
    Peters SMB; van der Werf NR; Segbers M; van Velden FHP; Wierts R; Blokland KJAK; Konijnenberg MW; Lazarenko SV; Visser EP; Gotthardt M
    EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):29. PubMed ID: 31879813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correction of photon attenuation and collimator response for a body-contouring SPECT/CT imaging system.
    Seo Y; Wong KH; Sun M; Franc BL; Hawkins RA; Hasegawa BH
    J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):868-77. PubMed ID: 15872362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of Resolution Recovery in Quantitative
    Ismail FS; Mansor S
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Sep; 50(3):449-453. PubMed ID: 31320272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Improvement of Standardized Uptake Value Accuracy in the
    Nakamura Y; Kangai Y; Abe T; Nakahara Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(9):921-931. PubMed ID: 34544916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental validation of absolute SPECT/CT quantification for response monitoring in patients with coronary artery disease.
    van de Burgt A; Dibbets-Schneider P; Slump CH; Scholte AJHA; Atsma DE; de Geus-Oei LF; van Velden FHP
    EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Jun; 8(1):48. PubMed ID: 34132918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 99mTc-MIBI scintigraphy as a functional method for the evaluation of multidrug resistance in breast cancer patients.
    Sergieva SB; Timcheva KV; Hadjiolov ND
    J BUON; 2006; 11(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 17318954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance evaluation of quantitative SPECT/CT using NEMA NU 2 PET methodology.
    Ryu H; Meikle SR; Willowson KP; Eslick EM; Bailey DL
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jul; 64(14):145017. PubMed ID: 31207583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of PET/CT system, reconstruction protocol, data analysis method, and repositioning on PET/CT precision: An experimental evaluation using an oncology and brain phantom.
    Mansor S; Pfaehler E; Heijtel D; Lodge MA; Boellaard R; Yaqub M
    Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6413-6424. PubMed ID: 28994465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What validation tests can be done by the clinical medical physicist while waiting for the standardization of quantitative SPECT/CT imaging?
    Piwowarska-Bilska H; Supińska A; Birkenfeld B
    EJNMMI Phys; 2022 Feb; 9(1):8. PubMed ID: 35122533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimization and evaluation of reconstruction-based compensation methods and reconstruction parameters for Tc-99m MIBI parathyroid SPECT.
    Ekjeen T; Tocharoenchai C; Pusuwan P; Fung GS; Ghaly M; Du Y; Frey EC
    Phys Med; 2015 Mar; 31(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 25555904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of quantitative SPECT/CT reconstruction in
    Jones KM; Solnes LB; Rowe SP; Gorin MA; Sheikhbahaei S; Fung G; Frey EC; Allaf ME; Du Y; Javadi MS
    Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Feb; 32(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 29214562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of Noise and Resolution for Quantitative
    Tran-Gia J; Lassmann M
    J Nucl Med; 2019 Jan; 60(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 29976698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.