These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29572912)

  • 21. Rebalancing Spatial Attention: Endogenous Orienting May Partially Overcome the Left Visual Field Bias in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.
    Śmigasiewicz K; Hasan GS; Verleger R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 29(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 27626225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visual attention to features by associative learning.
    Gozli DG; Moskowitz JB; Pratt J
    Cognition; 2014 Nov; 133(2):488-501. PubMed ID: 25173722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of perceptual load on tactile spatial attention: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Gherri E; Berreby F
    Brain Res; 2017 Oct; 1673():42-51. PubMed ID: 28803830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Category-based guidance of spatial attention during visual search for feature conjunctions.
    Nako R; Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1571-86. PubMed ID: 27213833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Leftward bias in orienting to and disengaging attention from salient task-irrelevant events in rapid serial visual presentation.
    Śmigasiewicz K; Westphal N; Verleger R
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():96-105. PubMed ID: 27916671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Investigating cue competition in contextual cuing of visual search.
    Beesley T; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):709-25. PubMed ID: 21895393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Towards understanding how we pay attention in naturalistic visual search settings.
    Turoman N; Tivadar RI; Retsa C; Murray MM; Matusz PJ
    Neuroimage; 2021 Dec; 244():118556. PubMed ID: 34492292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A unitary focus of spatial attention during attentional capture: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Grubert A; Righi LL; Eimer M
    J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(3):9. PubMed ID: 23641076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An early parietal ERP component of the frontoparietal system: EDAN not = N2pc.
    Praamstra P; Kourtis D
    Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1317():203-10. PubMed ID: 20059986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attentional capture by context cues, not inhibition of cue singletons, explains same location costs.
    Schönhammer JG; Becker SI; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Jun; 46(6):610-628. PubMed ID: 32191113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Parsing attentional processes involved in the elicitation of the N2pc component.
    Drew AP; Karst AT
    Neuroreport; 2019 Feb; 30(3):157-161. PubMed ID: 30489426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
    McDonald JJ; Green JJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The attentional blink freezes spatial attention allocation to targets, not distractors: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Pomerleau VJ; Fortier-Gauthier U; Corriveau I; McDonald JJ; Dell'Acqua R; Jolicœur P
    Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 1559():33-45. PubMed ID: 24607298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Learned predictiveness influences rapid attentional capture: evidence from the dot probe task.
    Le Pelley ME; Vadillo M; Luque D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1888-900. PubMed ID: 23855549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptual Learning Induces Persistent Attentional Capture by Nonsalient Shapes.
    Qu Z; Hillyard SA; Ding Y
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Feb; 27(2):1512-1523. PubMed ID: 26759483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preparatory α-band oscillations reflect spatial gating independently of predictions regarding target identity.
    Wildegger T; van Ede F; Woolrich M; Gillebert CR; Nobre AC
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Mar; 117(3):1385-1394. PubMed ID: 28077669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Early and late selection modulate competition for representation: Evidence from the N2pc in a multiple frame procedure.
    Aubin S; Jolicoeur P
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):611-22. PubMed ID: 26787529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Associative cueing of attention through implicit feature-location binding.
    Girardi G; Nico D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Sep; 179():54-60. PubMed ID: 28715694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Feedback-related brain potential activity complies with basic assumptions of associative learning theory.
    Luque D; López FJ; Marco-Pallares J; Càmara E; Rodríguez-Fornells A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Apr; 24(4):794-808. PubMed ID: 21981667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.