These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29573067)

  • 1. Single-use flexible bronchoscopes compared with reusable bronchoscopes: Positive organizational impact but a costly solution.
    Châteauvieux C; Farah L; Guérot E; Wermert D; Pineau J; Prognon P; Borget I; Martelli N
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Jun; 24(3):528-535. PubMed ID: 29573067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis of reusable vs. single-use flexible bronchoscopes.
    Mouritsen JM; Ehlers L; Kovaleva J; Ahmad I; El-Boghdadly K
    Anaesthesia; 2020 Apr; 75(4):529-540. PubMed ID: 31701521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A comparative cost analysis of single-use versus reusable fiberoptic bronchoscopes: Is single-use fiberscope worth it?].
    Videau M; Rghioui K; Mottet B; Sainfort A; Lefort I
    Ann Pharm Fr; 2017 Nov; 75(6):473-479. PubMed ID: 28818319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decision Support for the Capacity Management of Bronchoscopy Devices: Optimizing the Cost-Efficient Mix of Reusable and Single-Use Devices Through Mathematical Modeling.
    Edenharter GM; Gartner D; Pförringer D
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Jun; 124(6):1963-1967. PubMed ID: 28195840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How green is my reusable bronchoscope?
    Massart N; Millet C; Beloeil H; Fillatre P; Rouxel C; Daudin M; Coullier N; Marie V; Peguet E; Bardoult P
    Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med; 2024 Oct; 43(5):101420. PubMed ID: 39089450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Cost analysis comparing single-use (Ambu® aScope™) and conventional reusable fiberoptic flexible scopes for difficult tracheal intubation].
    Aïssou M; Coroir M; Debes C; Camus T; Hadri N; Gutton C; Beaussier M
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2013 May; 32(5):291-5. PubMed ID: 23561716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A cost analysis of reusable and disposable flexible optical scopes for intubation.
    Tvede MF; Kristensen MS; Nyhus-Andreasen M
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 May; 56(5):577-84. PubMed ID: 22338623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Operator Perception of a Single-Use Flexible Bronchoscope: Comparison With Current Standard Bronchoscopes.
    Liu L; Wahidi M; Mahmood K; Giovacchini C; Shofer S; Cheng G
    Respir Care; 2020 Nov; 65(11):1655-1662. PubMed ID: 32487752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways.
    Eckelman M; Mosher M; Gonzalez A; Sherman J
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 22492190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Life Cycle Assessment and Costing Methods for Device Procurement: Comparing Reusable and Single-Use Disposable Laryngoscopes.
    Sherman JD; Raibley LA; Eckelman MJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Aug; 127(2):434-443. PubMed ID: 29324492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative.
    Ozimek T; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Cordes J; Chlosta PL; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
    J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1226-1230. PubMed ID: 29073769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
    Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
    BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost Comparison of Single-Use Versus Reusable Bronchoscopes Used for Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy.
    Sohrt A; Ehlers L; Udsen FW; Mærkedahl A; McGrath BA
    Pharmacoecon Open; 2019 Jun; 3(2):189-195. PubMed ID: 30167996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A micro-costing analysis of outpatient flexible cystoscopy: implications for adoption of single-use flexible cystoscopes.
    Su ZT; Huang MM; Matlaga BR; Hutfless S; Koo K
    World J Urol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):4275-4281. PubMed ID: 34019137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Apelgren KN; Blank ML; Slomski CA; Hadjis NS
    Surg Endosc; 1994 Jan; 8(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 8153862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.
    Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Sherer BA; Metzler I; Isaacson D; Stoller ML; Chi T
    J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 29239227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness analysis of flexible optical scopes for tracheal intubation: a descriptive comparative study of reusable and single-use scopes.
    Gupta D; Wang H
    J Clin Anesth; 2011 Dec; 23(8):632-5. PubMed ID: 22137515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Adler S; Scherrer M; Rückauer KD; Daschner FD
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single Use or Disposable Flexible Bronchoscopes: Bench Top and Preclinical Comparison of Currently Available Devices.
    Deasy KF; Sweeney AM; Danish H; O'Reilly E; Ibrahim H; Kennedy MP
    J Intensive Care Med; 2023 Jun; 38(6):519-528. PubMed ID: 36609193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety.
    Siu J; Hill AG; MacCormick AD
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Jan; 87(1-2):28-33. PubMed ID: 27878921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.