303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29574566)
1. Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient parameters for glioma grading.
Wang Q; Zhang J; Xu X; Chen X; Xu B
J Neurooncol; 2018 Aug; 139(1):61-68. PubMed ID: 29574566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurements of diagnostic examination performance using quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in cerebral gliomas.
Server A; Kulle B; Gadmar ØB; Josefsen R; Kumar T; Nakstad PH
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 20708868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation Between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and the Ki-67 Proliferation Index in Grading Pediatric Glioma.
Yao R; Cheng A; Zhang Z; Jin B; Yu H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 47(2):322-328. PubMed ID: 36957971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Voxel-based clustered imaging by multiparameter diffusion tensor images for glioma grading.
Inano R; Oishi N; Kunieda T; Arakawa Y; Yamao Y; Shibata S; Kikuchi T; Fukuyama H; Miyamoto S
Neuroimage Clin; 2014; 5():396-407. PubMed ID: 25180159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of diffusion tensor imaging metrics for gliomas grading at 3 T.
Server A; Graff BA; Josefsen R; Orheim TE; Schellhorn T; Nordhøy W; Nakstad PH
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Mar; 83(3):e156-65. PubMed ID: 24457139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preoperative grading of supratentorial gliomas using high or standard b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging at 3T.
Cihangiroglu MM; Ozturk-Isik E; Firat Z; Kilickesmez O; Ulug AM; Ture U
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Mar; 98(3):261-268. PubMed ID: 28038915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Grading Gliomas Capability: Comparison between Visual Assessment and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Value Measurement on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI).
Phuttharak W; Thammaroj J; Wara-Asawapati S; Panpeng K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 Feb; 21(2):385-390. PubMed ID: 32102515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Diagnostic Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in the Grading of Pediatric Gliomas.
Yao R; Cheng A; Liu M; Zhang Z; Jin B; Yu H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2021 Mar-Apr 01; 45(2):269-276. PubMed ID: 33346568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement in glioma: Influence of region-of-interest determination methods on apparent diffusion coefficient values, interobserver variability, time efficiency, and diagnostic ability.
Han X; Suo S; Sun Y; Zu J; Qu J; Zhou Y; Chen Z; Xu J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Mar; 45(3):722-730. PubMed ID: 27527072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differentiation of Low- and High-Grade Gliomas Using High b-Value Diffusion Imaging with a Non-Gaussian Diffusion Model.
Sui Y; Xiong Y; Jiang J; Karaman MM; Xie KL; Zhu W; Zhou XJ
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Sep; 37(9):1643-9. PubMed ID: 27256851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Grading of Gliomas by Using Monoexponential, Biexponential, and Stretched Exponential Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging.
Bai Y; Lin Y; Tian J; Shi D; Cheng J; Haacke EM; Hong X; Ma B; Zhou J; Wang M
Radiology; 2016 Feb; 278(2):496-504. PubMed ID: 26230975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-Gaussian diffusion MR imaging of glioma: comparisons of multiple diffusion parameters and correlation with histologic grade and MIB-1 (Ki-67 labeling) index.
Yan R; Haopeng P; Xiaoyuan F; Jinsong W; Jiawen Z; Chengjun Y; Tianming Q; Ji X; Mao S; Yueyue D; Yong Z; Jianfeng L; Zhenwei Y
Neuroradiology; 2016 Feb; 58(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 26494463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging analysis of diffusion and microperfusion in grading gliomas and comparison with arterial spin labeling for evaluation of tumor perfusion.
Shen N; Zhao L; Jiang J; Jiang R; Su C; Zhang S; Tang X; Zhu W
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Sep; 44(3):620-32. PubMed ID: 26880230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating between high-grade gliomas and brain metastases.
Caravan I; Ciortea CA; Contis A; Lebovici A
Acta Radiol; 2018 May; 59(5):599-605. PubMed ID: 28835111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging--correlation with tumor grade.
Kang Y; Choi SH; Kim YJ; Kim KG; Sohn CH; Kim JH; Yun TJ; Chang KH
Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):882-90. PubMed ID: 21969667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Amide proton transfer imaging to discriminate between low- and high-grade gliomas: added value to apparent diffusion coefficient and relative cerebral blood volume.
Choi YS; Ahn SS; Lee SK; Chang JH; Kang SG; Kim SH; Zhou J
Eur Radiol; 2017 Aug; 27(8):3181-3189. PubMed ID: 28116517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of diffusion and perfusion imaging.
Arvinda HR; Kesavadas C; Sarma PS; Thomas B; Radhakrishnan VV; Gupta AK; Kapilamoorthy TR; Nair S
J Neurooncol; 2009 Aug; 94(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 19229590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Apparent diffusion coefficient for molecular subtyping of non-gadolinium-enhancing WHO grade II/III glioma: volumetric segmentation versus two-dimensional region of interest analysis.
Thust SC; Hassanein S; Bisdas S; Rees JH; Hyare H; Maynard JA; Brandner S; Tur C; Jäger HR; Yousry TA; Mancini L
Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3779-3788. PubMed ID: 29572636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging derived maps may distinguish between low and high grade gliomas before surgery.
Qi XX; Shi DF; Ren SX; Zhang SY; Li L; Li QC; Guan LM
Eur Radiol; 2018 Apr; 28(4):1748-1755. PubMed ID: 29143940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Noninvasive assessment of H3 K27M mutational status in diffuse midline gliomas by using apparent diffusion coefficient measurements.
Chen H; Hu W; He H; Yang Y; Wen G; Lv X
Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():152-159. PubMed ID: 31005167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
