These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2957458)

  • 1. Similarity, confusability, and the density hypothesis.
    Corter JE
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1987 Sep; 116(3):238-49. PubMed ID: 2957458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Density versus feature weights as predictors of visual identifications: comment on Appelman and Mayzner.
    Krumhansl CL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1982 Mar; 111(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 6460834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of geometric models to letter recognition: distance and density.
    Appelman IB; Mayzner MS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1982 Mar; 111(1):60-100. PubMed ID: 6460835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Generation of visual representations.
    Yaworsky KB; Johnson N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Oct; 7(5):978-84. PubMed ID: 6457118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Similarity between Fourier transforms of objects predicts their experimental confusions.
    Vol IA; Pavlovskaja MB; Bondarko VM
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jan; 47(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 2300420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A fuzzy logical model of letter identification.
    Oden GC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 May; 5(2):336-52. PubMed ID: 528944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A constructive-associative model of the contextual dependence of unidimensional similarity.
    Wedell DH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Jun; 22(3):634-61. PubMed ID: 8666957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repeated-stimulus superiority and inferiority effects in the identification of letters and digits.
    Proctor RW; Fober GW
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 Aug; 38(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 4088804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Loci of contextual effects in judgment.
    Mellers BA; Birnbaum MH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Aug; 8(4):582-601. PubMed ID: 6214609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Putting properties of objects in context: reply to Nickerson.
    Crist WB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Sep; 110(3):303-5. PubMed ID: 6457079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Context is important but it does not explain everything: a comment on "Matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set" by Crist.
    Nickerson RS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Sep; 110(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 6457078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential weighting of common and distinctive components.
    Ritov I; Gati I; Tversky A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1990 Mar; 119(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 2141061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A further test of sequential-sampling models that account for payoff effects on response bias in perceptual decision tasks.
    Diederich A
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):229-56. PubMed ID: 18372746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set.
    Crist WB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Sep; 110(3):269-96. PubMed ID: 6457077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interactions between spatially tuned mechanisms: converging evidence.
    Olzak LA
    J Opt Soc Am A; 1985 Sep; 2(9):1551-9. PubMed ID: 4045587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual and auditory coding confusability in students with and without learning disabilities.
    Hardy BW; McIntyre CW; Brown AS; North AJ
    J Learn Disabil; 1989 Dec; 22(10):646-51. PubMed ID: 2592870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of report order, identification method, and stimulus characteristics on multidimensional stimulus identification.
    Shieh KK; Lai CJ; Ellingstad VS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Feb; 82(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 8668508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dividing attention between the color and the shape of objects.
    Bonnel AM; Prinzmetal W
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Jan; 60(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 9503916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orienting in space and time: joint contributions to exogenous spatial cuing effects.
    Milliken B; Lupiáñez J; Roberts M; Stevanovski B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):877-83. PubMed ID: 15000534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors limiting large-scale localisation.
    Sterken Y; Toet A; Yap YL
    Perception; 1994; 23(6):709-26. PubMed ID: 7845763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.