These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29575170)

  • 1. Random-effects meta-analysis of the clinical utility of tests and prediction models.
    Wynants L; Riley RD; Timmerman D; Van Calster B
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(12):2034-2052. PubMed ID: 29575170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Summarising and validating test accuracy results across multiple studies for use in clinical practice.
    Riley RD; Ahmed I; Debray TP; Willis BH; Noordzij JP; Higgins JP; Deeks JJ
    Stat Med; 2015 Jun; 34(13):2081-103. PubMed ID: 25800943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multivariate meta-analysis of individual participant data helped externally validate the performance and implementation of a prediction model.
    Snell KI; Hua H; Debray TP; Ensor J; Look MP; Moons KG; Riley RD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():40-50. PubMed ID: 26142114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Bayesian approach to toxicological testing.
    Felli JC; Leishman DJ
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2020 Sep; 105():106898. PubMed ID: 32735877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: alternative parameterizations and model selection.
    Chu H; Nie L; Cole SR; Poole C
    Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2384-99. PubMed ID: 19499551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A vine copula mixed effect model for trivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence.
    Nikoloulopoulos AK
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2270-2286. PubMed ID: 26265766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Calibration of risk prediction models: impact on decision-analytic performance.
    Van Calster B; Vickers AJ
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Feb; 35(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25155798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using individual patient data and aggregate data.
    Riley RD; Dodd SR; Craig JV; Thompson JR; Williamson PR
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(29):6111-36. PubMed ID: 18816508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beyond discrimination: A comparison of calibration methods and clinical usefulness of predictive models of readmission risk.
    Walsh CG; Sharman K; Hripcsak G
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 Dec; 76():9-18. PubMed ID: 29079501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simple and robust method for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Chen Y; Liu Y; Chu H; Ting Lee ML; Schmid CH
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(1):105-121. PubMed ID: 27580758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk Prediction Models for Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.
    Gray EP; Teare MD; Stevens J; Archer R
    Clin Lung Cancer; 2016 Mar; 17(2):95-106. PubMed ID: 26712102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decision curve analysis: a technical note.
    Zhang Z; Rousson V; Lee WC; Ferdynus C; Chen M; Qian X; Guo Y;
    Ann Transl Med; 2018 Aug; 6(15):308. PubMed ID: 30211196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polymerase chain reaction blood tests for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised people.
    Cruciani M; Mengoli C; Loeffler J; Donnelly P; Barnes R; Jones BL; Klingspor L; Morton O; Maertens J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; (9):CD009551. PubMed ID: 26343815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Presurgical diagnosis of adnexal tumours using mathematical models and scoring systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kaijser J; Sayasneh A; Van Hoorde K; Ghaem-Maghami S; Bourne T; Timmerman D; Van Calster B
    Hum Reprod Update; 2014; 20(3):449-62. PubMed ID: 24327552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A mixed effect model for bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution.
    Nikoloulopoulos AK
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(29):3842-65. PubMed ID: 26234584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical inference for decision curve analysis, with applications to cataract diagnosis.
    Sande SZ; Li J; D'Agostino R; Yin Wong T; Cheng CY
    Stat Med; 2020 Sep; 39(22):2980-3002. PubMed ID: 32667093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a binary outcome.
    Riley RD; Debray TPA; Collins GS; Archer L; Ensor J; van Smeden M; Snell KIE
    Stat Med; 2021 Aug; 40(19):4230-4251. PubMed ID: 34031906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Bayesian meta-analytic approach for safety signal detection in randomized clinical trials.
    Odani M; Fukimbara S; Sato T
    Clin Trials; 2017 Apr; 14(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 28059578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.