These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29575170)

  • 21. Meta-analysis of prediction model performance across multiple studies: Which scale helps ensure between-study normality for the C-statistic and calibration measures?
    Snell KI; Ensor J; Debray TP; Moons KG; Riley RD
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Nov; 27(11):3505-3522. PubMed ID: 28480827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy assessment studies with varying number of thresholds.
    Dukic V; Gatsonis C
    Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):936-46. PubMed ID: 14969472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A random effects meta-analysis model with Box-Cox transformation.
    Yamaguchi Y; Maruo K; Partlett C; Riley RD
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):109. PubMed ID: 28724350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Bayesian meta-analytic approach for safety signal detection in randomized clinical trials.
    Odani M; Fukimbara S; Sato T
    Clin Trials; 2017 Apr; 14(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 28059578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bivariate meta-analysis of predictive values of diagnostic tests can be an alternative to bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity.
    Leeflang MM; Deeks JJ; Rutjes AW; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 65(10):1088-97. PubMed ID: 22742916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A discussion of calibration techniques for evaluating binary and categorical predictive models.
    Fenlon C; O'Grady L; Doherty ML; Dunnion J
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Jan; 149():107-114. PubMed ID: 29290291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Geographic and temporal validity of prediction models: different approaches were useful to examine model performance.
    Austin PC; van Klaveren D; Vergouwe Y; Nieboer D; Lee DS; Steyerberg EW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Nov; 79():76-85. PubMed ID: 27262237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A simple method to estimate prediction intervals and predictive distributions: Summarizing meta-analyses beyond means and confidence intervals.
    Wang CC; Lee WC
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):255-266. PubMed ID: 30835918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predictive value and efficiency of hematology data.
    Galen RS
    Blood Cells; 1980; 6(2):185-97. PubMed ID: 6769520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. What is the test's accuracy in my practice population? Tailored meta-analysis provides a plausible estimate.
    Willis BH; Hyde CJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Aug; 68(8):847-54. PubMed ID: 25479685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A framework for developing, implementing, and evaluating clinical prediction models in an individual participant data meta-analysis.
    Debray TP; Moons KG; Ahmed I; Koffijberg H; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2013 Aug; 32(18):3158-80. PubMed ID: 23307585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. On the interpretation of test sensitivity in the two-test two-population problem: assumptions matter.
    Johnson WO; Gardner IA; Metoyer CN; Branscum AJ
    Prev Vet Med; 2009 Oct; 91(2-4):116-21. PubMed ID: 19651450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Use of multilayer perception artificial neutral networks for the prediction of the probability of malignancy in adnexal tumors].
    Smoleń A; Czekierdowski A; Stachowicz N; Kotarski J
    Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):855-62. PubMed ID: 14674136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Guidance for deriving and presenting percentage study weights in meta-analysis of test accuracy studies.
    Burke DL; Ensor J; Snell KIE; van der Windt D; Riley RD
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):163-178. PubMed ID: 29115060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Tailored meta-analysis: an investigation of the correlation between the test positive rate and prevalence.
    Willis BH; Coomar D; Baragilly M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():1-9. PubMed ID: 30278213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing the dependence of sensitivity and specificity on prevalence in meta-analysis.
    Li J; Fine JP
    Biostatistics; 2011 Oct; 12(4):710-22. PubMed ID: 21525421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimating a test's accuracy using tailored meta-analysis-How setting-specific data may aid study selection.
    Willis BH; Hyde CJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 May; 67(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 24447592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Meta-analysis and aggregation of multiple published prediction models.
    Debray TP; Koffijberg H; Nieboer D; Vergouwe Y; Steyerberg EW; Moons KG
    Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(14):2341-62. PubMed ID: 24752993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.