These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29575584)

  • 41. Evaluation of peri-implant marginal bone loss using modified abutment connections at various crestal level placements.
    Veis A; Parissis N; Tsirlis A; Papadeli C; Marinis G; Zogakis A
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Dec; 30(6):609-17. PubMed ID: 20967307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of external and internal implant-abutment connections for implant supported prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Bonfante EA; Santiago Júnior JF; Pellizzer EP
    J Dent; 2018 Mar; 70():14-22. PubMed ID: 29221955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Marginal Bone Changes around Platform-Switching Implants Placed in Crestal or Subcrestal Positions: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Kütan E; Bolukbasi N; Yildirim-Ondur E; Ozdemir T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():e364-75. PubMed ID: 25041252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Influence of a machined collar on crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a histometric study in the canine mandible.
    Hermann JS; Jones AA; Bakaeen LG; Buser D; Schoolfield JD; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2011 Sep; 82(9):1329-38. PubMed ID: 21486176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Influence of the abutment height on marginal bone level changes around two-piece dental implants: Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Muñoz M; Vilarrasa J; Ruíz-Magaz V; Albertini M; Nart J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Feb; 34(2):81-94. PubMed ID: 36482067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: a 1-year prospective controlled clinical trial.
    Linkevicius T; Apse P; Grybauskas S; Puisys A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):712-9. PubMed ID: 19885413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Clinical comparison between crestal and subcrestal dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cruz RS; Lemos CAA; de Luna Gomes JM; Fernandes E Oliveira HF; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):408-417. PubMed ID: 33358610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible.
    Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Schenk RK; Buser D; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1372-83. PubMed ID: 11699479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Crestal bone changes around implants with reduced abutment diameter placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions: a 1-year radiographic evaluation.
    Donovan R; Fetner A; Koutouzis T; Lundgren T
    J Periodontol; 2010 Mar; 81(3):428-34. PubMed ID: 20192870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Long-term results after subcrestal or crestal placement of delayed loaded implants.
    Romanos GE; Aydin E; Gaertner K; Nentwig GH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 17(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 23675969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Influence of Laser-Microtextured Surface Collar on Marginal Bone Loss and Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Chen Z; Zhang Y; Li J; Wang HL; Yu H
    J Periodontol; 2017 Jul; 88(7):651-662. PubMed ID: 28304212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Influence of microgap location and configuration on radiographic bone loss in nonsubmerged implants: an experimental study in dogs.
    Weng D; Nagata MJ; Leite CM; de Melo LG; Bosco AF
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(5):445-52. PubMed ID: 21909485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The impact of subcrestal placement on short locking-taper implants placed in posterior maxilla and mandible: a retrospective evaluation on hard and soft tissues stability after 2 years of loading.
    Lombardo G; Corrocher G; Pighi J; Faccioni F; Rovera A; Marincola M; Nocini PF
    Minerva Stomatol; 2014; 63(11-12):391-402. PubMed ID: 25503340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A retrospective study on the crestal bone loss associated with different implant surfaces in chronic periodontitis patients under maintenance.
    Gallego L; Sicilia A; Sicilia P; Mallo C; Cuesta S; Sanz M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jun; 29(6):557-567. PubMed ID: 29664148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Influence of microgap location and configuration on radiographic bone loss around submerged implants: an experimental study in dogs.
    Weng D; Nagata MJ; Bosco AF; de Melo LG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):941-6. PubMed ID: 22010074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Influence of implant neck surface and placement depth on crestal bone changes and soft tissue dimensions around platform-switched implants: A histologic study in dogs.
    Valles C; Rodriguez-Ciurana X; Muñoz F; Permuy M; López-Alonso H; Nart J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Jul; 45(7):869-883. PubMed ID: 29505132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Biologic width around different implant-abutment interface configurations. A radiographic evaluation of the effect of horizontal offset and concave abutment profile in the canine mandible.
    Caram SJ; Huynh-Ba G; Schoolfield JD; Jones AA; Cochran DL; Belser UC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1114-22. PubMed ID: 25216137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cone beam computed tomographic evaluation of implants with platform-switched Morse taper connection with the implant-abutment interface at different levels in relation to the alveolar crest.
    Koutouzis T; Neiva R; Nair M; Nonhoff J; Lundgren T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1157-63. PubMed ID: 25216143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A Prospective Multicenter Study on Radiographic Crestal Bone Changes Around Dental Implants Placed at Crestal or Subcrestal Level: One-Year Findings.
    Gatti C; Gatti F; Silvestri M; Mintrone F; Rossi R; Tridondani G; Piacentini G; Borrelli P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):913-918. PubMed ID: 30025009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Influence of microgap location and configuration on the periimplant bone morphology in submerged implants. An experimental study in dogs.
    Weng D; Nagata MJ; Bell M; Bosco AF; de Melo LG; Richter EJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18983317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.