These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29577072)

  • 1. Theoretical vs. empirical discriminability: the application of ROC methods to eyewitness identification.
    Wixted JT; Mickes L
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2018; 3(1):9. PubMed ID: 29577072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eyewitness identification in simultaneous and sequential lineups: an investigation of position effects using receiver operating characteristics.
    Meisters J; Diedenhofen B; Musch J
    Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1297-1309. PubMed ID: 29676666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fair lineups are better than biased lineups and showups, but not because they increase underlying discriminability.
    Smith AM; Wells GL; Lindsay RC; Penrod SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Apr; 41(2):127-145. PubMed ID: 27685645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distinguishing Between Investigator Discriminability and Eyewitness Discriminability: A Method for Creating Full Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves of Lineup Identification Performance.
    Smith AM; Yang Y; Wells GL
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 May; 15(3):589-607. PubMed ID: 32375014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A signal-detection-based diagnostic-feature-detection model of eyewitness identification.
    Wixted JT; Mickes L
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Apr; 121(2):262-76. PubMed ID: 24730600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups.
    Lee J; Penrod SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do sequential lineups impair underlying discriminability?
    Kaesler M; Dunn JC; Ransom K; Semmler C
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Aug; 5(1):35. PubMed ID: 32754862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Models of lineup memory.
    Wixted JT; Vul E; Mickes L; Wilson BM
    Cogn Psychol; 2018 Sep; 105():81-114. PubMed ID: 30032063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. fullROC: An R package for generating and analyzing eyewitness-lineup ROC curves.
    Yang Y; Smith AM
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1259-1274. PubMed ID: 35641680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying the guilty word: Simultaneous versus sequential lineups for DRM word lists.
    Finley JR; Wixted JT; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Aug; 48(6):903-919. PubMed ID: 32222916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of eyewitness memory: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous versus sequential lineups.
    Mickes L; Flowe HD; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):361-76. PubMed ID: 23294282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups.
    Wixted JT; Mickes L; Dunn JC; Clark SE; Wells W
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jan; 113(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 26699467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of lineup size on eyewitness identification.
    Akan M; Robinson MM; Mickes L; Wixted JT; Benjamin AS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Jun; 27(2):369-392. PubMed ID: 33271047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ROC curve analyses of eyewitness identification decisions: An analysis of the recent debate.
    Rotello CM; Chen T
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2016; 1(1):10. PubMed ID: 28180161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sequential lineup presentation promotes less-biased criterion setting but does not improve discriminability.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 22667814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eyewitness Identification: Live, Photo, and Video Lineups.
    Fitzgerald RJ; Price HL; Valentine T
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 2018 Aug; 24(3):307-325. PubMed ID: 30100702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lineup fairness: propitious heterogeneity and the diagnostic feature-detection hypothesis.
    Carlson CA; Jones AR; Whittington JE; Lockamyeir RF; Carlson MA; Wooten AR
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Jun; 4(1):20. PubMed ID: 31197501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Field of Eyewitness Memory Should Abandon Probative Value and Embrace Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis.
    Wixted JT; Mickes L
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2012 May; 7(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 26168465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relative judgment theory and the mediation of facial recognition: Implications for theories of eyewitness identification.
    McAdoo RM; Gronlund SD
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2016; 1(1):11. PubMed ID: 28180162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing encoding specificity and the diagnostic feature-detection theory of eyewitness identification, with implications for showups, lineups, and partially disguised perpetrators.
    Carlson CA; Hemby JA; Wooten AR; Jones AR; Lockamyeir RF; Carlson MA; Dias JL; Whittington JE
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Mar; 6(1):14. PubMed ID: 33660118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.