These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Pattern component modeling: A flexible approach for understanding the representational structure of brain activity patterns. Diedrichsen J; Yokoi A; Arbuckle SA Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt A):119-133. PubMed ID: 28843540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inverted Encoding Models Assay Population-Level Stimulus Representations, Not Single-Unit Neural Tuning. Sprague TC; Adam KCS; Foster JJ; Rahmati M; Sutterer DW; Vo VA eNeuro; 2018; 5(3):. PubMed ID: 29876523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative modeling of the neural representation of objects: how semantic feature norms can account for fMRI activation. Chang KM; Mitchell T; Just MA Neuroimage; 2011 May; 56(2):716-27. PubMed ID: 20451625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peeling the Onion of Brain Representations. Kriegeskorte N; Diedrichsen J Annu Rev Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 42():407-432. PubMed ID: 31283895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inferring brain-computational mechanisms with models of activity measurements. Kriegeskorte N; Diedrichsen J Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2016 Oct; 371(1705):. PubMed ID: 27574316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multi-Connection Pattern Analysis: Decoding the representational content of neural communication. Li Y; Richardson RM; Ghuman AS Neuroimage; 2017 Nov; 162():32-44. PubMed ID: 28813643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Primer on Pattern-Based Approaches to fMRI: Principles, Pitfalls, and Perspectives. Haynes JD Neuron; 2015 Jul; 87(2):257-70. PubMed ID: 26182413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Model of Representational Spaces in Human Cortex. Guntupalli JS; Hanke M; Halchenko YO; Connolly AC; Ramadge PJ; Haxby JV Cereb Cortex; 2016 Jun; 26(6):2919-2934. PubMed ID: 26980615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interpreting the dimensions of neural feature representations revealed by dimensionality reduction. Goddard E; Klein C; Solomon SG; Hogendoorn H; Carlson TA Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt A):41-67. PubMed ID: 28663068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Resolving Ambiguities of MVPA Using Explicit Models of Representation. Naselaris T; Kay KN Trends Cogn Sci; 2015 Oct; 19(10):551-554. PubMed ID: 26412094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fusing EEG and fMRI based on a bottom-up model: inferring activation and effective connectivity in neural masses. Riera J; Aubert E; Iwata K; Kawashima R; Wan X; Ozaki T Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2005 May; 360(1457):1025-41. PubMed ID: 16087446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modular encoding and decoding models derived from bayesian canonical correlation analysis. Fujiwara Y; Miyawaki Y; Kamitani Y Neural Comput; 2013 Apr; 25(4):979-1005. PubMed ID: 23339608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Representational formats of human memory traces. Heinen R; Bierbrauer A; Wolf OT; Axmacher N Brain Struct Funct; 2024 Apr; 229(3):513-529. PubMed ID: 37022435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Testing the generalization of neural representations. Sandhaeger F; Siegel M Neuroimage; 2023 Sep; 278():120258. PubMed ID: 37429371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring neural representations with fMRI: practices and pitfalls. Davis T; Poldrack RA Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2013 Aug; 1296():108-34. PubMed ID: 23738883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiclass fMRI data decoding and visualization using supervised self-organizing maps. Hausfeld L; Valente G; Formisano E Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():54-66. PubMed ID: 24531045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]