These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29578376)

  • 1. From 'automation' to 'autonomy': the importance of trust repair in human-machine interaction.
    de Visser EJ; Pak R; Shaw TH
    Ergonomics; 2018 Oct; 61(10):1409-1427. PubMed ID: 29578376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Trust in Automation: Implications for Understanding Autonomy in Future Systems.
    Schaefer KE; Chen JY; Szalma JL; Hancock PA
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):377-400. PubMed ID: 27005902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From Here to Autonomy.
    Endsley MR
    Hum Factors; 2017 Feb; 59(1):5-27. PubMed ID: 28146676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imposing limits on autonomous systems.
    Hancock PA
    Ergonomics; 2017 Feb; 60(2):284-291. PubMed ID: 27409152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trusting Automation: Designing for Responsivity and Resilience.
    Chiou EK; Lee JD
    Hum Factors; 2023 Feb; 65(1):137-165. PubMed ID: 33906505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revisiting human-machine trust: a replication study of Muir and Moray (1996) using a simulated pasteurizer plant task.
    Lee J; Yamani Y; Long SK; Unverricht J; Itoh M
    Ergonomics; 2021 Sep; 64(9):1132-1145. PubMed ID: 33818301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust.
    Hoff KA; Bashir M
    Hum Factors; 2015 May; 57(3):407-34. PubMed ID: 25875432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trusted Autonomy and Cognitive Cyber Symbiosis: Open Challenges.
    Abbass HA; Petraki E; Merrick K; Harvey J; Barlow M
    Cognit Comput; 2016; 8():385-408. PubMed ID: 27257440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Little Anthropomorphism Goes a Long Way.
    de Visser EJ; Monfort SS; Goodyear K; Lu L; O'Hara M; Lee MR; Parasuraman R; Krueger F
    Hum Factors; 2017 Feb; 59(1):116-133. PubMed ID: 28146673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The reliability and transparency bases of trust in human-swarm interaction: principles and implications.
    Hussein A; Elsawah S; Abbass HA
    Ergonomics; 2020 Sep; 63(9):1116-1132. PubMed ID: 32370651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Not all trust is created equal: dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions.
    Merritt SM; Ilgen DR
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):194-210. PubMed ID: 18516832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhancing component-specific trust with consumer automated systems through humanness design.
    Lopez J; Watkins H; Pak R
    Ergonomics; 2023 Feb; 66(2):291-302. PubMed ID: 35583421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extending Three Existing Models to Analysis of Trust in Automation: Signal Detection, Statistical Parameter Estimation, and Model-Based Control.
    Sheridan TB
    Hum Factors; 2019 Nov; 61(7):1162-1170. PubMed ID: 30811950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Teaming With a Synthetic Teammate: Insights into Human-Autonomy Teaming.
    McNeese NJ; Demir M; Cooke NJ; Myers C
    Hum Factors; 2018 Mar; 60(2):262-273. PubMed ID: 29185818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does automation trust evolve from a leap of faith? An analysis using a reprogrammed pasteurizer simulation task.
    Long SK; Lee J; Yamani Y; Unverricht J; Itoh M
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Apr; 100():103674. PubMed ID: 35026680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive trust calibration for human-AI collaboration.
    Okamura K; Yamada S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229132. PubMed ID: 32084201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Humans: still vital after all these years of automation.
    Parasuraman R; Wickens CD
    Hum Factors; 2008 Jun; 50(3):511-20. PubMed ID: 18689061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The frequency of positive and negative interactions influences relationship equity and trust in automation.
    Sharp WH; Jackson KM; Shaw TH
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Apr; 108():103961. PubMed ID: 36640742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Autonomous technology - sources of confusion: a model for explanation and prediction of conceptual shifts.
    Stensson P; Jansson A
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(3):455-70. PubMed ID: 24308694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.