188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29578735)
1. Establishing individual differences in perceptual capacity.
Eayrs J; Lavie N
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1240-1257. PubMed ID: 29578735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptual load and enumeration: Distractor interference depends on subitizing capacity.
Eayrs JO; Lavie N
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Sep; 47(9):1149-1165. PubMed ID: 34694846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Individual differences in parietal and frontal cortex structure predict dissociable capacities for perception and cognitive control.
Eayrs JO; Lavie N
Neuroimage; 2019 Nov; 202():116148. PubMed ID: 31476428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Possible Associations between Subitizing, Estimation and Visuospatial Working Memory (VSWM) in Children.
Formoso J; Barreyro JP; Jacubovich S; Injoque-Ricle I
Span J Psychol; 2017 Jun; 20():E27. PubMed ID: 28578725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatial working memory load affects counting but not subitizing in enumeration.
Shimomura T; Kumada T
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1694-709. PubMed ID: 21671157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What can half a million change detection trials tell us about visual working memory?
Balaban H; Fukuda K; Luria R
Cognition; 2019 Oct; 191():103984. PubMed ID: 31234117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Individual differences in susceptibility to inattentional blindness.
Seegmiller JK; Watson JM; Strayer DL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 May; 37(3):785-91. PubMed ID: 21299325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Working memory and inattentional blindness.
Bredemeier K; Simons DJ
Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Apr; 19(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 22222359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence for a shared mechanism used in multiple-object tracking and subitizing.
Chesney DL; Haladjian HH
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2457-80. PubMed ID: 21968785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Animacy, perceptual load, and inattentional blindness.
Calvillo DP; Jackson RE
Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Jun; 21(3):670-5. PubMed ID: 24197657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adaptation affects both high and low (subitized) numbers under conditions of high attentional load.
Burr DC; Anobile G; Turi M
Seeing Perceiving; 2011; 24(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 21864455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of strategy on visual working memory capacity.
Bengson JJ; Luck SJ
Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):265-70. PubMed ID: 26139356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perception in the absence of attention: perceptual processing in the Roelofs effect during inattentional blindness.
Lathrop WB; Bridgeman B; Tseng P
Perception; 2011; 40(9):1104-19. PubMed ID: 22208130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Influence of Attention Set, Working Memory Capacity, and Expectations on Inattentional Blindness.
Kreitz C; Furley P; Memmert D; Simons DJ
Perception; 2016 Apr; 45(4):386-99. PubMed ID: 26562879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attention and Capacity Limits in Perception: A Cellular Metabolism Account.
Bruckmaier M; Tachtsidis I; Phan P; Lavie N
J Neurosci; 2020 Aug; 40(35):6801-6811. PubMed ID: 32747442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring the interrelations among multiple paradigms of visual attention: an individual differences approach.
Huang L; Mo L; Li Y
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):414-28. PubMed ID: 22250865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visual perceptual load induces inattentional deafness.
Macdonald JS; Lavie N
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1780-9. PubMed ID: 21611856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Subitizing reflects visuo-spatial object individuation capacity.
Piazza M; Fumarola A; Chinello A; Melcher D
Cognition; 2011 Oct; 121(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 21679934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.
Dowd EW; Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Mitroff SR
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 25737257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cross-modal attention modulates tactile subitizing but not tactile numerosity estimation.
Tian Y; Chen L
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1229-1239. PubMed ID: 29549663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
