These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29578735)

  • 41. Reconceptualizing perceptual load as a rate problem: The role of time in the allocation of selective attention.
    Li Z; Xin K; Li W; Li Y
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1458-1471. PubMed ID: 29708380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Is inattentional blindness related to individual differences in visual working memory capacity or executive control functioning?
    Hannon EM; Richards A
    Perception; 2010; 39(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 20465168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Pupillary response predicts multiple object tracking load, error rate, and conscientiousness, but not inattentional blindness.
    Wright TJ; Boot WR; Morgan CS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 23743340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Load theory behind the wheel; perceptual and cognitive load effects.
    Murphy G; Greene CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Sep; 71(3):191-202. PubMed ID: 28604027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The capacity to detect synchronous audiovisual events is severely limited: Evidence from mixture modeling.
    Olivers CNL; Awh E; Van der Burg E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2115-2124. PubMed ID: 27854458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Inattentional blindness for ignored words: comparison of explicit and implicit memory tasks.
    Butler BC; Klein R
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 19328012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Neural measures reveal a fixed item limit in subitizing.
    Ester EF; Drew T; Klee D; Vogel EK; Awh E
    J Neurosci; 2012 May; 32(21):7169-77. PubMed ID: 22623661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Alerting cues enhance the subitizing process.
    Gliksman Y; Weinbach N; Henik A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Oct; 170():139-45. PubMed ID: 27423007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Components of working memory and visual selective attention.
    Burnham BR; Sabia M; Langan C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):391-403. PubMed ID: 23875574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Dual associations between hand preference and visual asymmetry in perception of faces.
    Ida Y
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Dec; 87(3 Pt 1):1035-41. PubMed ID: 9885075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Inattentional blindness reflects limitations on perception, not memory: Evidence from repeated failures of awareness.
    Ward EJ; Scholl BJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):722-7. PubMed ID: 25515671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Two's company, three's a crowd: Individuation is necessary for object recognition.
    Chakravarthi R; Herbert A
    Cognition; 2019 Mar; 184():69-82. PubMed ID: 30576886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Spatial and visuospatial working memory tests predict performance in classic multiple-object tracking in young adults, but nonspatial measures of the executive do not.
    Trick LM; Mutreja R; Hunt K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):300-11. PubMed ID: 22076680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. High perceptual load leads to both reduced gain and broader orientation tuning.
    Stolte M; Bahrami B; Lavie N
    J Vis; 2014 Mar; 14(3):9. PubMed ID: 24610952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Seeing the unseen: autism involves reduced susceptibility to inattentional blindness.
    Swettenham J; Remington A; Murphy P; Feuerstein M; Grim K; Lavie N
    Neuropsychology; 2014 Jul; 28(4):563-70. PubMed ID: 24417193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory.
    Hollingworth A; Beck VM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 27123681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Executive and perceptual distraction in visual working memory.
    Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1677-1693. PubMed ID: 28414499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Does subitizing reflect numerical estimation?
    Revkin SK; Piazza M; Izard V; Cohen L; Dehaene S
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jun; 19(6):607-14. PubMed ID: 18578852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. What impairs subitizing in cerebral palsied children?
    Arp S; Fagard J
    Dev Psychobiol; 2005 Jul; 47(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 15959897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Intentional subitizing: exploring the role of automaticity in enumeration.
    Pincham HL; Szűcs D
    Cognition; 2012 Aug; 124(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 22695378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.