These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29578754)

  • 1. Auditory Task Irrelevance: A Basis for Inattentional Deafness.
    Scheer M; Bülthoff HH; Chuang LL
    Hum Factors; 2018 May; 60(3):428-440. PubMed ID: 29578754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inattentional Deafness: Visual Load Leads to Time-Specific Suppression of Auditory Evoked Responses.
    Molloy K; Griffiths TD; Chait M; Lavie N
    J Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 35(49):16046-54. PubMed ID: 26658858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The modulation of auditory novelty processing by working memory load in school age children and adults: a combined behavioral and event-related potential study.
    Ruhnau P; Wetzel N; Widmann A; Schröger E
    BMC Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 11():126. PubMed ID: 20929535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inattentional deafness to auditory alarms: Inter-individual differences, electrophysiological signature and single trial classification.
    Dehais F; Roy RN; Scannella S
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Mar; 360():51-59. PubMed ID: 30508609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus complexity effects on the event-related potentials to task-irrelevant stimuli.
    Barkaszi I; Czigler I; Balázs L
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Sep; 94(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 23702457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention capture by auditory significant stimuli: semantic analysis follows attention switching.
    Escera C; Yago E; Corral MJ; Corbera S; Nuñez MI
    Eur J Neurosci; 2003 Oct; 18(8):2408-12. PubMed ID: 14622204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What is novel in the novelty oddball paradigm? Functional significance of the novelty P3 event-related potential as revealed by independent component analysis.
    Debener S; Makeig S; Delorme A; Engel AK
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):309-21. PubMed ID: 15722203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissociating neural correlates of consciousness and task relevance during auditory processing.
    Schlossmacher I; Dellert T; Bruchmann M; Straube T
    Neuroimage; 2021 Mar; 228():117712. PubMed ID: 33387630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive resources are distributed among the entire auditory landscape in auditory scene analysis.
    Symonds RM; Zhou JW; Cole SL; Brace KM; Sussman ES
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Feb; 57(2):e13487. PubMed ID: 31578762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. That does not sound right: Sounds affect visual ERPs during a piano sight-reading task.
    Delogu F; Brunetti R; Inuggi A; Campus C; Del Gatto C; D'Ausilio A
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 367():1-9. PubMed ID: 30922941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Negative emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing.
    Domínguez-Borràs J; Garcia-Garcia M; Escera C
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 18287956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual load does not decrease the auditory steady-state response to 40-Hz amplitude-modulated tones.
    Szychowska M; Wiens S
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Dec; 57(12):e13689. PubMed ID: 32944959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The old switcheroo: when target environmental sounds elicit a novelty P3.
    Cycowicz YM; Friedman D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 115(6):1359-67. PubMed ID: 15134703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Graded visual attention modulates brain responses evoked by task-irrelevant auditory pitch changes.
    Yucel G; Petty C; McCarthy G; Belger A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1819-28. PubMed ID: 16356321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. P300 event-related potential as an indicator of inattentional deafness?
    Giraudet L; St-Louis ME; Scannella S; Causse M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0118556. PubMed ID: 25714746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of mental workload with task-irrelevant auditory probes.
    Kramer AF; Trejo LJ; Humphrey D
    Biol Psychol; 1995 May; 40(1-2):83-100. PubMed ID: 7647188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural signature of inattentional deafness.
    Durantin G; Dehais F; Gonthier N; Terzibas C; Callan DE
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Nov; 38(11):5440-5455. PubMed ID: 28744950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does working memory capacity predict cross-modally induced failures of awareness?
    Kreitz C; Furley P; Simons DJ; Memmert D
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 Jan; 39():18-27. PubMed ID: 26658847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control.
    Barcelo F; Escera C; Corral MJ; Periáñez JA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1734-48. PubMed ID: 17014377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.