These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29579045)
1. From correlation to causation: Estimating effective connectivity from zero-lag covariances of brain signals. Schiefer J; Niederbühl A; Pernice V; Lennartz C; Hennig J; LeVan P; Rotter S PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Mar; 14(3):e1006056. PubMed ID: 29579045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of Directed Effective Connectivity from fMRI Functional Connectivity Hints at Asymmetries of Cortical Connectome. Gilson M; Moreno-Bote R; Ponce-Alvarez A; Ritter P; Deco G PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Mar; 12(3):e1004762. PubMed ID: 26982185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A blind deconvolution approach to recover effective connectivity brain networks from resting state fMRI data. Wu GR; Liao W; Stramaglia S; Ding JR; Chen H; Marinazzo D Med Image Anal; 2013 Apr; 17(3):365-74. PubMed ID: 23422254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential Covariance: A New Method to Estimate Functional Connectivity in fMRI. Lin TW; Chen Y; Bukhari Q; Krishnan GP; Bazhenov M; Sejnowski TJ Neural Comput; 2020 Dec; 32(12):2389-2421. PubMed ID: 32946714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SPARK: Sparsity-based analysis of reliable k-hubness and overlapping network structure in brain functional connectivity. Lee K; Lina JM; Gotman J; Grova C Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 134():434-449. PubMed ID: 27046111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Network analysis of whole-brain fMRI dynamics: A new framework based on dynamic communicability. Gilson M; Kouvaris NE; Deco G; Mangin JF; Poupon C; Lefranc S; Rivière D; Zamora-López G Neuroimage; 2019 Nov; 201():116007. PubMed ID: 31306771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relation between structural and functional connectivity patterns in complex brain networks. Stam CJ; van Straaten EC; Van Dellen E; Tewarie P; Gong G; Hillebrand A; Meier J; Van Mieghem P Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 May; 103():149-60. PubMed ID: 25678023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Construct validation of a DCM for resting state fMRI. Razi A; Kahan J; Rees G; Friston KJ Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 106():1-14. PubMed ID: 25463471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic effective connectivity in resting state fMRI. Park HJ; Friston KJ; Pae C; Park B; Razi A Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt B):594-608. PubMed ID: 29158202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A critical assessment of connectivity measures for EEG data: a simulation study. Haufe S; Nikulin VV; Müller KR; Nolte G Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 64():120-33. PubMed ID: 23006806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mapping individual differences across brain network structure to function and behavior with connectome embedding. Levakov G; Faskowitz J; Avidan G; Sporns O Neuroimage; 2021 Nov; 242():118469. PubMed ID: 34390875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Linking human brain local activity fluctuations to structural and functional network architectures. Baria AT; Mansour A; Huang L; Baliki MN; Cecchi GA; Mesulam MM; Apkarian AV Neuroimage; 2013 Jun; 73():144-55. PubMed ID: 23396160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of global signal regression on DCM estimates of noise and effective connectivity from resting state fMRI. Almgren H; Van de Steen F; Razi A; Friston K; Marinazzo D Neuroimage; 2020 Mar; 208():116435. PubMed ID: 31816423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian Estimation of Conditional Independence Graphs Improves Functional Connectivity Estimates. Hinne M; Janssen RJ; Heskes T; van Gerven MA PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Nov; 11(11):e1004534. PubMed ID: 26540089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inferring neuronal network functional connectivity with directed information. Cai Z; Neveu CL; Baxter DA; Byrne JH; Aazhang B J Neurophysiol; 2017 Aug; 118(2):1055-1069. PubMed ID: 28468991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Network diffusion accurately models the relationship between structural and functional brain connectivity networks. Abdelnour F; Voss HU; Raj A Neuroimage; 2014 Apr; 90():335-47. PubMed ID: 24384152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Function-specific and Enhanced Brain Structural Connectivity Mapping via Joint Modeling of Diffusion and Functional MRI. Chu SH; Parhi KK; Lenglet C Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):4741. PubMed ID: 29549287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multi-subject hierarchical inverse covariance modelling improves estimation of functional brain networks. Colclough GL; Woolrich MW; Harrison SJ; Rojas López PA; Valdes-Sosa PA; Smith SM Neuroimage; 2018 Sep; 178():370-384. PubMed ID: 29746906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complementary contributions of concurrent EEG and fMRI connectivity for predicting structural connectivity. Wirsich J; Ridley B; Besson P; Jirsa V; Bénar C; Ranjeva JP; Guye M Neuroimage; 2017 Nov; 161():251-260. PubMed ID: 28842386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A generative model of whole-brain effective connectivity. Frässle S; Lomakina EI; Kasper L; Manjaly ZM; Leff A; Pruessmann KP; Buhmann JM; Stephan KE Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():505-529. PubMed ID: 29807151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]