These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29579217)

  • 1. Nursing and Hospital Abortions in the United States, 1967-1973.
    Haugeberg K
    J Hist Med Allied Sci; 2018 Oct; 73(4):412-436. PubMed ID: 29579217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Women's reproductive health.
    Rosenfield A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jul; 169(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 8333437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cross-cultural history of abortion.
    Shain RN
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 3519038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abortion in America: 12 years after Roe v. Wade.
    Popul Today; 1985 Nov; 13(11):2, 8-9. PubMed ID: 12267463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
    Bryant MD
    Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The legal status of abortion in the states if Roe v. Wade is overruled.
    Linton PB
    Issues Law Med; 2007; 23(1):3-43. PubMed ID: 17703698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abortion: a tangle of rights.
    Curtin LL
    Nurs Manage; 1993 Feb; 24(2):26, 28, 30-1. PubMed ID: 8429970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The legal status of abortion in the States if Roe v. Wade is overruled.
    Linton PB
    Issues Law Med; 2012; 27(3):181-228. PubMed ID: 22696839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion: a legal and public health perspective.
    Kunins H; Rosenfield A
    Annu Rev Public Health; 1991; 12():361-82. PubMed ID: 2049141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. U.S. abortion policy since Roe v. Wade.
    Mcfarlane DR
    Am J Gynecol Health; 1993; 7(4):98-106. PubMed ID: 12288251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals.
    Benshoof J
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortion ethics.
    Fromer MJ
    Nurs Outlook; 1982 Apr; 30(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 7041095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physician provision of abortion before Roe v. Wade.
    Joffe C
    Res Sociol Health Care; 1991; 9():21-32. PubMed ID: 12317573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed, again.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Oct; 16(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 3771197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The medicolegal aspects of abortion.
    Hall RE
    Obstet Gynecol Annu; 1972; 1():339-50. PubMed ID: 4591072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nurses' attitudes to therapeutic abortion.
    Webb C
    Nurs Times; 1985 Jan 2-8; 81(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 3844178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concealing emotions: nurses' experiences with induced abortion care.
    Yang CF; Che HL; Hsieh HW; Wu SM
    J Clin Nurs; 2016 May; 25(9-10):1444-54. PubMed ID: 26991834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Roe v. Wade. Jane's perspective.
    Kaplan L
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):27-8. PubMed ID: 12178883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors influencing the delivery of abortion services in Ontario: a descriptive study.
    Ferris LE; McMain-Klein M; Iron K
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(3):134-8. PubMed ID: 9635262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.