435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29579617)
1. Benefits of left ventricular endocardial pacing comparing failed implants and prior non-responders to conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy: A subanalysis from the ALSYNC study.
Biffi M; Defaye P; Jaïs P; Ruffa F; Leclercq C; Gras D; Yang Z; Gerritse B; Ziacchi M; Morgan JM;
Int J Cardiol; 2018 May; 259():88-93. PubMed ID: 29579617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ALternate Site Cardiac ResYNChronization (ALSYNC): a prospective and multicentre study of left ventricular endocardial pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Morgan JM; Biffi M; Gellér L; Leclercq C; Ruffa F; Tung S; Defaye P; Yang Z; Gerritse B; van Ginneken M; Yee R; Jais P;
Eur Heart J; 2016 Jul; 37(27):2118-27. PubMed ID: 26787437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrically vs. imaging-guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a randomized controlled trial.
Stephansen C; Sommer A; Kronborg MB; Jensen JM; Nørgaard BL; Gerdes C; Kristensen J; Jensen HK; Fyenbo DB; Bouchelouche K; Nielsen JC
Europace; 2019 Sep; 21(9):1369-1377. PubMed ID: 31274152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Wireless Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing: The SELECT-LV Study.
Reddy VY; Miller MA; Neuzil P; Søgaard P; Butter C; Seifert M; Delnoy PP; van Erven L; Schalji M; Boersma LVA; Riahi S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 May; 69(17):2119-2129. PubMed ID: 28449772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Right heart function interacts with left ventricular remodeling after CRT: A pressure volume loop study.
Schmeisser A; Rauwolf T; Ghanem A; Groscheck T; Adolf D; Grothues F; Fischbach K; Kosiek O; Huth C; Kropf S; Lange S; Luani B; Smid J; Schäfer MH; Schreiber J; Tanev I; Wengler F; Yeritsyan NB; Steendijk P; Braun-Dullaeus RC
Int J Cardiol; 2018 Oct; 268():156-161. PubMed ID: 29548538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional interlead distance predicts response and outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Clementy N; Laborie G; Pierre B; Benhenda N; Babuty D; Fauchier L
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Nov; 110(11):590-598. PubMed ID: 28734687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive factors of difficult implantation procedure in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Bisch L; Da Costa A; Dauphinot V; Romeyer-Bouchard C; Khris L; M'baye A; Isaaz K
Europace; 2010 Aug; 12(8):1141-8. PubMed ID: 20573673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multipoint left ventricular pacing in a single coronary sinus branch improves mid-term echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Pappone C; Ćalović Ž; Vicedomini G; Cuko A; McSpadden LC; Ryu K; Romano E; Baldi M; Saviano M; Pappone A; Ciaccio C; Giannelli L; Ionescu B; Petretta A; Vitale R; Fundaliotis A; Tavazzi L; Santinelli V
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 25109276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non-Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single-Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization.
Leyva F; Zegard A; Qiu T; Acquaye E; Ferrante G; Walton J; Marshall H
J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Oct; 6(10):. PubMed ID: 29042422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces T-wave alternans in patients with heart failure.
Hua W; Chen K; Zhou X; Dai Y; Chen R; Wang J; Ding L; Liu Z; Feng T; Yu J; Cheng J; Liu C; Zhang S
Europace; 2015 Feb; 17(2):281-8. PubMed ID: 25398405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility, safety, and short-term outcome of leadless ultrasound-based endocardial left ventricular resynchronization in heart failure patients: results of the wireless stimulation endocardially for CRT (WiSE-CRT) study.
Auricchio A; Delnoy PP; Butter C; Brachmann J; Van Erven L; Spitzer S; Moccetti T; Seifert M; Markou T; Laszo K; Regoli F;
Europace; 2014 May; 16(5):681-8. PubMed ID: 24497573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrically guided versus imaging-guided implant of the left ventricular lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a study protocol for a double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial (ElectroCRT).
Stephansen C; Sommer A; Kronborg MB; Jensen JM; Bouchelouche K; Nielsen JC
Trials; 2018 Nov; 19(1):600. PubMed ID: 30382923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Right ventricular lead positioning does not influence the benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation.
Rönn F; Kesek M; Karp K; Henein M; Jensen SM
Europace; 2011 Dec; 13(12):1747-52. PubMed ID: 21712261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (ImagingCRT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Sommer A; Kronborg MB; Poulsen SH; Böttcher M; Nørgaard BL; Bouchelouche K; Mortensen PT; Gerdes C; Nielsen JC
Trials; 2013 Apr; 14():113. PubMed ID: 23782792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and moderately reduced ejection fraction: Could it trigger a super-response?
Tawfik Ghanem M; Allam LE; Samir Ahmed R
Indian Heart J; 2019; 71(3):229-234. PubMed ID: 31543195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by QRS Morphology in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT).
Zareba W; Klein H; Cygankiewicz I; Hall WJ; McNitt S; Brown M; Cannom D; Daubert JP; Eldar M; Gold MR; Goldberger JJ; Goldenberg I; Lichstein E; Pitschner H; Rashtian M; Solomon S; Viskin S; Wang P; Moss AJ;
Circulation; 2011 Mar; 123(10):1061-72. PubMed ID: 21357819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cardiac contractility modulation treatment in patients with symptomatic heart failure despite optimal medical therapy and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Kuschyk J; Nägele H; Heinz-Kuck K; Butter C; Lawo T; Wietholt D; Roeger S; Gutterman D; Burkhoff D; Rousso B; Borggrefe M
Int J Cardiol; 2019 Feb; 277():173-177. PubMed ID: 30409733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multipoint left ventricular pacing with large anatomical separation improves reverse remodeling and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in responders and non-responders to conventional biventricular pacing.
Schiedat F; Schöne D; Aweimer A; Bösche L; Ewers A; Gotzmann M; Patsalis PC; Mügge A; Kloppe A
Clin Res Cardiol; 2020 Feb; 109(2):183-193. PubMed ID: 31152199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term clinical response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy under a multidisciplinary model.
O'Donnell D; Lin T; Swale M; Rae P; Flannery D; Srivastava PM
Intern Med J; 2013 Nov; 43(11):1216-23. PubMed ID: 24015775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Right ventricular septal pacing as alternative for failed left ventricular lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates.
Alhous MH; Small GR; Hannah A; Hillis GS; Frenneaux M; Broadhurst PA
Europace; 2015 Jan; 17(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 25359384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
