These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29579737)

  • 1. A Facets Analysis of Analytic vs. Holistic Scoring of Identical Short Constructed-Response Items: Different Outcomes and Their Implications for Scoring Rubric Development.
    Curcin M; Sweiry E
    J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(3):228-246. PubMed ID: 29579737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing holistic and analytic scoring for performance assessment with many-facet Rasch model.
    Chi E
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(4):379-88. PubMed ID: 12011505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Multi-institutional Study of the Feasibility and Reliability of the Implementation of Constructed Response Exam Questions.
    Olvet DM; Bird JB; Fulton TB; Kruidering M; Papp KK; Qua K; Willey JM; Brenner JM
    Teach Learn Med; 2023; 35(5):609-622. PubMed ID: 35989668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Holistic rubric vs. analytic rubric for measuring clinical performance levels in medical students.
    Yune SJ; Lee SY; Im SJ; Kam BS; Baek SY
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Jun; 18(1):124. PubMed ID: 29871677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Item and rater analysis of constructed response items via the multi-faceted Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(3):335-47. PubMed ID: 19671993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developing and Validating a Scientific Multi-Text Reading Comprehension Assessment: In the Text Case of the Dispute of whether to Continue the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant Construction in Taiwan.
    Hsiao-Hui L; Tzeng YT
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(3):320-337. PubMed ID: 30169338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The raters' differences in Arabic writing rubrics through the Many-Facet Rasch measurement model.
    Baharudin H; Maskor ZM; Matore MEEM
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():988272. PubMed ID: 36591072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A standardized rubric to evaluate student presentations.
    Peeters MJ; Sahloff EG; Stone GE
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2010 Nov; 74(9):171. PubMed ID: 21301605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring nursing competencies in the operating theatre: instrument development and psychometric analysis using Item Response Theory.
    Nicholson P; Griffin P; Gillis S; Wu M; Dunning T
    Nurse Educ Today; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1088-93. PubMed ID: 22608826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of scoring rubrics to determine clinical performance in the operating suite.
    Nicholson P; Gillis S; Dunning AM
    Nurse Educ Today; 2009 Jan; 29(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 18755529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Item response theory model highlighting rating scale of a rubric and rater-rubric interaction in objective structured clinical examination.
    Uto M; Tsuruta J; Araki K; Ueno M
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(9):e0309887. PubMed ID: 39240906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developing a scoring rubric for resident research presentations: a pilot study.
    Musial JL; Rubinfeld IS; Parker AO; Reickert CA; Adams SA; Rao S; Shepard AD
    J Surg Res; 2007 Oct; 142(2):304-7. PubMed ID: 17719066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Essential steps in developing best practices to assess reflective skill: A comparison of two rubrics.
    Miller-Kuhlmann R; O'Sullivan PS; Aronson L
    Med Teach; 2016; 38(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 25923234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inter-rater reliability and generalizability of patient note scores using a scoring rubric based on the USMLE Step-2 CS format.
    Park YS; Hyderi A; Bordage G; Xing K; Yudkowsky R
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 Oct; 21(4):761-73. PubMed ID: 26757931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the complementarity of holistic and analytic approaches to performance assessment scoring.
    Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia O; Shavelson RJ; Schmidt S; Beck K
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2019 Sep; 89(3):468-484. PubMed ID: 31004361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of Test Items with Rasch Measurement Model.
    Osadebe PU
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(1):106-112. PubMed ID: 29561745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative analysis of the ratings in performance assessment using generalizability theory and the many-facet Rasch model.
    Kim SC; Wilson M
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):408-23. PubMed ID: 19934528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of an analytical rubric and estimation of its validity and inter-rater reliability for assessing reflective narrations.
    Venugopal V; Dongre A; Kagne RN
    Natl Med J India; 2023; 36(5):323-326. PubMed ID: 38759987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the impact of modifications to the documentation component's scoring rubric and rater training on USMLE integrated clinical encounter scores.
    Baldwin SG; Harik P; Keller LA; Clauser BE; Baldwin P; Rebbecchi TA
    Acad Med; 2009 Oct; 84(10 Suppl):S97-100. PubMed ID: 19907399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity and reliability of an application review process using dedicated reviewers in one stage of a multi-stage admissions model.
    Zeeman JM; McLaughlin JE; Cox WC
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2017 Nov; 9(6):972-979. PubMed ID: 29233394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.