These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. What does the facial dot-probe task tell us about attentional processes in social anxiety? A systematic review. Bantin T; Stevens S; Gerlach AL; Hermann C J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2016 Mar; 50():40-51. PubMed ID: 26042381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neurophysiological correlates of attentional bias for emotional faces in socially anxious individuals - Evidence from a visual search task and N2pc. Wieser MJ; Hambach A; Weymar M Biol Psychol; 2018 Feb; 132():192-201. PubMed ID: 29307540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the reliability of attention bias and attention bias variability measures in the dot-probe task among people with social anxiety disorder. Molloy A; Anderson PL Psychol Assess; 2020 Sep; 32(9):883-888. PubMed ID: 32525343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The psychometric properties of the dot-probe paradigm when used in pain-related attentional bias research. Dear BF; Sharpe L; Nicholas MK; Refshauge K J Pain; 2011 Dec; 12(12):1247-54. PubMed ID: 21982721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Empirical recommendations for improving the stability of the dot-probe task in clinical research. Price RB; Kuckertz JM; Siegle GJ; Ladouceur CD; Silk JS; Ryan ND; Dahl RE; Amir N Psychol Assess; 2015 Jun; 27(2):365-76. PubMed ID: 25419646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computational Modeling Applied to the Dot-Probe Task Yields Improved Reliability and Mechanistic Insights. Price RB; Brown V; Siegle GJ Biol Psychiatry; 2019 Apr; 85(7):606-612. PubMed ID: 30449531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patterns of attention to threat across tasks in behaviorally inhibited children at risk for anxiety. Morales S; Taber-Thomas BC; Pérez-Edgar KE Dev Sci; 2017 Mar; 20(2):. PubMed ID: 26786586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Social anxiety and attentional biases: A top-down contribution? Boal HL; Christensen BK; Goodhew SC Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 28887795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Social anxiety is related to increased dwell time on socially threatening faces. Lazarov A; Abend R; Bar-Haim Y J Affect Disord; 2016 Mar; 193():282-8. PubMed ID: 26774515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Reliability and Validity of Response-Based Measures of Attention Bias. Meissel EEE; Liu H; Stevens ES; Evans TC; Britton JC; Letkiewicz AM; Shankman SA Cognit Ther Res; 2022 Feb; 46(1):146-160. PubMed ID: 35330671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrocortical evidence for rapid allocation of attention to threat in the dot-probe task. Kappenman ES; MacNamara A; Proudfit GH Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 10(4):577-83. PubMed ID: 25062842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increased attention allocation to socially threatening faces in social anxiety disorder: A replication study. Lazarov A; Basel D; Dolan S; Dillon DG; Pizzagalli DA; Schneier FR J Affect Disord; 2021 Jul; 290():169-177. PubMed ID: 34000570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anxiety-Linked Attentional Bias: Is It Reliable? MacLeod C; Grafton B; Notebaert L Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2019 May; 15():529-554. PubMed ID: 30649926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Behavioral and ERP measures of attentional bias to threat in the dot-probe task: poor reliability and lack of correlation with anxiety. Kappenman ES; Farrens JL; Luck SJ; Proudfit GH Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1368. PubMed ID: 25538644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Face processing in adolescents with positive and negative threat bias. Sylvester CM; Petersen SE; Luby JL; Barch DM Psychol Med; 2017 Apr; 47(5):800-809. PubMed ID: 27873557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The N2pc component reliably captures attentional bias in social anxiety. Reutter M; Hewig J; Wieser MJ; Osinsky R Psychophysiology; 2017 Apr; 54(4):519-527. PubMed ID: 28111770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Too bad: Bias for angry faces in social anxiety interferes with identity processing. Hagemann J; Straube T; Schulz C Neuropsychologia; 2016 Apr; 84():136-49. PubMed ID: 26878979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]