BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29581267)

  • 1. Exploring the structural origins of cryptic sites on proteins.
    Beglov D; Hall DR; Wakefield AE; Luo L; Allen KN; Kozakov D; Whitty A; Vajda S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Apr; 115(15):E3416-E3425. PubMed ID: 29581267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Structure-Based Analysis of Cryptic-Site Opening.
    Sun Z; Wakefield AE; Kolossvary I; Beglov D; Vajda S
    Structure; 2020 Feb; 28(2):223-235.e2. PubMed ID: 31810712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cryptic binding sites on proteins: definition, detection, and druggability.
    Vajda S; Beglov D; Wakefield AE; Egbert M; Whitty A
    Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2018 Jun; 44():1-8. PubMed ID: 29800865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deciphering Cryptic Binding Sites on Proteins by Mixed-Solvent Molecular Dynamics.
    Kimura SR; Hu HP; Ruvinsky AM; Sherman W; Favia AD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Jun; 57(6):1388-1401. PubMed ID: 28537745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accelerated Ligand-Mapping Molecular Dynamics Simulations for the Detection of Recalcitrant Cryptic Pockets and Occluded Binding Sites.
    Tze-Yang Ng J; Tan YS
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Mar; 18(3):1969-1981. PubMed ID: 35175753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The FTMap family of web servers for determining and characterizing ligand-binding hot spots of proteins.
    Kozakov D; Grove LE; Hall DR; Bohnuud T; Mottarella SE; Luo L; Xia B; Beglov D; Vajda S
    Nat Protoc; 2015 May; 10(5):733-55. PubMed ID: 25855957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding Cryptic Pocket Formation in Protein Targets by Enhanced Sampling Simulations.
    Oleinikovas V; Saladino G; Cossins BP; Gervasio FL
    J Am Chem Soc; 2016 Nov; 138(43):14257-14263. PubMed ID: 27726386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identification of Cryptic Binding Sites Using MixMD with Standard and Accelerated Molecular Dynamics.
    Smith RD; Carlson HA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Mar; 61(3):1287-1299. PubMed ID: 33599485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Small Glycols Discover Cryptic Pockets on Proteins for Fragment-Based Approaches.
    Bansia H; Mahanta P; Yennawar NH; Ramakumar S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Mar; 61(3):1322-1333. PubMed ID: 33570386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CryptoSite: Expanding the Druggable Proteome by Characterization and Prediction of Cryptic Binding Sites.
    Cimermancic P; Weinkam P; Rettenmaier TJ; Bichmann L; Keedy DA; Woldeyes RA; Schneidman-Duhovny D; Demerdash ON; Mitchell JC; Wells JA; Fraser JS; Sali A
    J Mol Biol; 2016 Feb; 428(4):709-719. PubMed ID: 26854760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structural studies of the streptavidin binding loop.
    Freitag S; Le Trong I; Klumb L; Stayton PS; Stenkamp RE
    Protein Sci; 1997 Jun; 6(6):1157-66. PubMed ID: 9194176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structural Fluctuations of Aromatic Residues in an Apo-Form Reveal Cryptic Binding Sites: Implications for Fragment-Based Drug Design.
    Iida S; Nakamura HK; Mashimo T; Fukunishi Y
    J Phys Chem B; 2020 Nov; 124(45):9977-9986. PubMed ID: 33140952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cosolvent-Enhanced Sampling and Unbiased Identification of Cryptic Pockets Suitable for Structure-Based Drug Design.
    Schmidt D; Boehm M; McClendon CL; Torella R; Gohlke H
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 May; 15(5):3331-3343. PubMed ID: 30998331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perturbation Approaches for Exploring Protein Binding Site Flexibility to Predict Transient Binding Pockets.
    Kokh DB; Czodrowski P; Rippmann F; Wade RC
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Aug; 12(8):4100-13. PubMed ID: 27399277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Molecular Dynamics Simulation and Prediction of Druggable Binding Sites.
    Feng T; Barakat K
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():87-103. PubMed ID: 29594769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mapping the binding sites of challenging drug targets.
    Wakefield AE; Kozakov D; Vajda S
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2022 Aug; 75():102396. PubMed ID: 35636004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structural conservation of druggable hot spots in protein-protein interfaces.
    Kozakov D; Hall DR; Chuang GY; Cencic R; Brenke R; Grove LE; Beglov D; Pelletier J; Whitty A; Vajda S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Aug; 108(33):13528-33. PubMed ID: 21808046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Collective Variable for the Rapid Exploration of Protein Druggability.
    Cuchillo R; Pinto-Gil K; Michel J
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Mar; 11(3):1292-307. PubMed ID: 26579775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Structure-based druggability assessment of the mammalian structural proteome with inclusion of light protein flexibility.
    Loving KA; Lin A; Cheng AC
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2014 Jul; 10(7):e1003741. PubMed ID: 25079060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are induced fit protein conformational changes caused by ligand-binding predictable? A molecular dynamics investigation.
    Gao C; Desaphy J; Vieth M
    J Comput Chem; 2017 Jun; 38(15):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 28419481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.