171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29581399)
1. Friendship across species borders: factors that facilitate and constrain heterospecific sociality.
Sridhar H; Guttal V
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 May; 373(1746):. PubMed ID: 29581399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of sociality on competitive interactions among birds.
Berberi I; Miller ET; Dakin R
Proc Biol Sci; 2023 Mar; 290(1994):20221894. PubMed ID: 36855867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mixed company: a framework for understanding the composition and organization of mixed-species animal groups.
Goodale E; Sridhar H; Sieving KE; Bangal P; Colorado Z GJ; Farine DR; Heymann EW; Jones HH; Krams I; Martínez AE; Montaño-Centellas F; Muñoz J; Srinivasan U; Theo A; Shanker K
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2020 Aug; 95(4):889-910. PubMed ID: 32097520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sociality and health: impacts of sociality on disease susceptibility and transmission in animal and human societies.
Kappeler PM; Cremer S; Nunn CL
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 May; 370(1669):. PubMed ID: 25870402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conspecific and heterospecific information use in bumblebees.
Dawson EH; Chittka L
PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31444. PubMed ID: 22347479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nest site preference depends on the relative density of conspecifics and heterospecifics in wild birds.
Samplonius JM; Kromhout Van Der Meer IM; Both C
Front Zool; 2017; 14():56. PubMed ID: 29270207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of heterospecific and conspecific competition on inter-individual differences in tungara frog tadpole (
Beyts C; Cella M; Colegrave N; Downie R; Martin JGA; Walsh P
Behav Ecol; 2023; 34(2):210-222. PubMed ID: 36998994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Role of Individual Heterogeneity in Collective Animal Behaviour.
Jolles JW; King AJ; Killen SS
Trends Ecol Evol; 2020 Mar; 35(3):278-291. PubMed ID: 31879039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Collective animal navigation and migratory culture: from theoretical models to empirical evidence.
Berdahl AM; Kao AB; Flack A; Westley PAH; Codling EA; Couzin ID; Dell AI; Biro D
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 May; 373(1746):. PubMed ID: 29581394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: from mechanisms to consequences.
Magrath RD; Haff TM; Fallow PM; Radford AN
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2015 May; 90(2):560-86. PubMed ID: 24917385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interspecific sociality alters the colonization and extinction rates of birds on subtropical reservoir islands.
Martínez AE; Si X; Zhou L; Zeng D; Ding P; Goodale E
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Jun; 378(1878):20220096. PubMed ID: 37066642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scent of death: Evolution from sea to land of an extreme collective attraction to conspecific death.
Valdes L; Laidre ME
Ecol Evol; 2019 Feb; 9(4):2171-2179. PubMed ID: 30847102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of conspecific and heterospecific aggregation cues and alarm odors on shelter choice by syntopic spiny lobsters.
Briones-Fourzán P; Ramírez-Zaldívar E; Lozano-Alvarez E
Biol Bull; 2008 Oct; 215(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 18840779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hopping on: Conspecific traveller density within a vehicle regulates parasitic hitchhiking between ephemeral microcosms.
Gupta S; Borges RM
J Anim Ecol; 2021 Apr; 90(4):899-908. PubMed ID: 33368398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The adaptive value of sociality in mammalian groups.
Silk JB
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2007 Apr; 362(1480):539-59. PubMed ID: 17363359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Social Information on Fear and Food Drives Animal Grouping and Fitness.
Gil MA; Emberts Z; Jones H; St Mary CM
Am Nat; 2017 Mar; 189(3):227-241. PubMed ID: 28221835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Social information use is a process across time, space, and ecology, reaching heterospecifics.
Seppänen JT; Forsman JT; Mönkkönen M; Thomson RL
Ecology; 2007 Jul; 88(7):1622-33. PubMed ID: 17645008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Female degus show high sociality but no preference for familiar peers.
Insel N; Shambaugh KL; Beery AK
Behav Processes; 2020 May; 174():104102. PubMed ID: 32145271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Opposing Responses to Scarcity Emerge from Functionally Unique Sociality Drivers.
Kao AB; Hund AK; Santos FP; Young JG; Bhat D; Garland J; Oomen RA; McCreery HF
Am Nat; 2023 Sep; 202(3):302-321. PubMed ID: 37606948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ecological Transitions in Grouping Benefits Explain the Paradox of Environmental Quality and Sociality.
Liu 劉彥廷 M; Chan 詹仕凡 SF; Rubenstein DR; Sun 孫烜駿 SJ; Chen 陳伯飛 BF; Shen 沈聖峰 SF
Am Nat; 2020 May; 195(5):818-832. PubMed ID: 32364780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
