These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2958149)

  • 1. [Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by a combination of culture and direct immunofluorescence].
    Sturcová E
    Cesk Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 1987 Jul; 36(4):218-22. PubMed ID: 2958149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A comparative study of DNA probe, direct immunofluorescence and cell culture in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital infections].
    Caruso C; Calisto ML; Donia D; Picerno I; Spataro P; Toscano MS; Bisignano G
    Ann Ig; 1991; 3(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 1724161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid diagnosis by immunofluorescence of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infections.
    Del Pezzo M; Miloso M; Piccoli S; Gulletta E
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1987; 80(1-12):183-8. PubMed ID: 3334312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Chlamydia trachomatis. Direct detection with an immunofluorescence test].
    Iveland H; Skaug K; Dahl M; Bergan T; Stray-Pedersen B; Anestad G; Gundersen T; Andersen GM
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1986 Aug; 106(22):1689-90, 1673. PubMed ID: 3535161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of nonculture-dependent methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in pregnant women.
    Baselski VS; McNeeley SG; Ryan G; Robison M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jul; 70(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 3299179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of culture, direct fluorescent antibody test, and a quantitative indirect immunoperoxidase assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women.
    Osborne NG; Hecht Y; Gorsline J; Forbes BA; Morgenstern F; Winkelman J
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):412-5. PubMed ID: 3279354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in endocervical specimens using direct immunofluorescence.
    Graber CD; Williamson O; Pike J; Valicenti J
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 66(5):727-30. PubMed ID: 3903585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection by direct immunofluorescence staining of genital secretion.
    Wiesmeier E; Bruckner D; Black M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):347-9. PubMed ID: 3547210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Direct identification of Chlamydia trachomatis using fluorescent monoclonal antibodies in infections of the lower urogenital tract].
    Morier P; Frenk E; Walzer C
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 1986; 113(9):799-803. PubMed ID: 3548542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Chlamydia diagnosis in clinical practice. Chlamydia trachomatis EIA and direct immunofluorescence (MikroTak) in comparison with cell culture].
    Gelzer D; Cathomas G; Bienz K; Rohrbach M; Viollier E; Rufli T
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1988 Feb; 118(7):223-6. PubMed ID: 3282301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Chlamydia trachomatis: comparative study of isolation with cell culture and direct examination, in the diagnosis of male urethritis].
    Belda W; Mendes CM; Carvalho RP; Siqueira LF; Francisco W; dos Santos Júnior MF
    Rev Paul Med; 1985; 103(4):199-201. PubMed ID: 3914049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae with DNA probe (a note).
    Széll A; Tisza T; Horváth A
    Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung; 1994; 41(3):291-3. PubMed ID: 7697325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and culture techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Tabrizi SN; Lees MI; Garland SM
    Mol Cell Probes; 1993 Oct; 7(5):357-60. PubMed ID: 8264669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Cell culture for active Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a population of symptomatic women in Abidjan].
    Bankolé H; Faye-Ketté H; Laruche G; Dabis F; Welffens-Ekra C; Dosso M
    Bull Soc Pathol Exot; 2001 Aug; 94(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 11681217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chlamydia trachomatis detection by immunofluorescence: a comparison of two methods of slide preparation.
    Patrizio C; Smith IW
    Br J Biomed Sci; 1994 Jun; 51(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 8049614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A correlative study of Papanicolaou smear, fluorescent antibody, and culture for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Spence MR; Barbacci M; Kappus E; Quinn T
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):691-5. PubMed ID: 3531937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct fluorescent antibody testing for endocervical Chlamydia trachomatis: factors affecting accuracy.
    Livengood CH; Schmitt JW; Addison WA; Wrenn JW; Magruder-Habib K
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Nov; 72(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 3050655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Rapid detection of Chlamydia trachomatis using monoclonal antibodies in the immunofluorescence test].
    Strauss J; Podanná B; Drazdáková M; Kastánková V; Tryzna R
    Cas Lek Cesk; 1987 Sep; 126(39):1215-20. PubMed ID: 3311378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vaginal Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence in sexually abused prepurbertal girls.
    Fuster CD; Neinstein LS
    Pediatrics; 1987 Feb; 79(2):235-8. PubMed ID: 3543832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Epidemiological findings on Chlamydia trachomatis infections of the female genitalia. Comparison of detection methods].
    Garella D; Zotti C; Moiraghi Ruggenini A; Latino MA; Gordini G; Peretto M; Ramella A
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1984; 77(1-6):94-105. PubMed ID: 6399275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.