These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29582242)

  • 1. Automatic Pectoral Muscle Region Segmentation in Mammograms Using Genetic Algorithm and Morphological Selection.
    Shen R; Yan K; Xiao F; Chang J; Jiang C; Zhou K
    J Digit Imaging; 2018 Oct; 31(5):680-691. PubMed ID: 29582242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection and Segmentation of Pectoral Muscle on MLO-View Mammogram Using Enhancement Filter.
    Vikhe PS; Thool VR
    J Med Syst; 2017 Oct; 41(12):190. PubMed ID: 29071592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Geometry-Based Pectoral Muscle Segmentation From MLO Mammogram Views.
    Taghanaki SA; Liu Y; Miles B; Hamarneh G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2662-2671. PubMed ID: 28129144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic Detection of Pectoral Muscle Region for Computer-Aided Diagnosis Using MIAS Mammograms.
    Yoon WB; Oh JE; Chae EY; Kim HH; Lee SY; Kim KG
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():5967580. PubMed ID: 27847817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A robust method for segmenting pectoral muscle in mediolateral oblique (MLO) mammograms.
    Yin K; Yan S; Song C; Zheng B
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(2):237-248. PubMed ID: 30288698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robust Automatic Pectoral Muscle Segmentation from Mammograms Using Texture Gradient and Euclidean Distance Regression.
    Bora VB; Kothari AG; Keskar AG
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 26259521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic pectoral muscle segmentation on mediolateral oblique view mammograms.
    Kwok SM; Chandrasekhar R; Attikiouzel Y; Rickard MT
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Sep; 23(9):1129-40. PubMed ID: 15377122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Review of recent advances in segmentation of the breast boundary and the pectoral muscle in mammograms.
    Mustra M; Grgic M; Rangayyan RM
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Jul; 54(7):1003-24. PubMed ID: 26546074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive hysteresis thresholding segmentation technique for localizing the breast masses in the curve stitching domain.
    Mughal B; Muhammad N; Sharif M
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Jun; 126():26-34. PubMed ID: 31029261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
    Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fully automated breast boundary and pectoral muscle segmentation in mammograms.
    Rampun A; Morrow PJ; Scotney BW; Winder J
    Artif Intell Med; 2017 Jun; 79():28-41. PubMed ID: 28606722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast pectoral muscle segmentation in mammograms using a modified holistically-nested edge detection network.
    Rampun A; López-Linares K; Morrow PJ; Scotney BW; Wang H; Ocaña IG; Maclair G; Zwiggelaar R; González Ballester MA; Macía I
    Med Image Anal; 2019 Oct; 57():1-17. PubMed ID: 31254729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-aided identification of the pectoral muscle in digitized mammograms.
    Camilus KS; Govindan VK; Sathidevi PS
    J Digit Imaging; 2010 Oct; 23(5):562-80. PubMed ID: 19816741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pectoral muscle identification in mammograms.
    Camilus KS; Govindan VK; Sathidevi PS
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 12(3):3285. PubMed ID: 21844845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic identification of the pectoral muscle in mammograms.
    Ferrari RJ; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE; Borges RA; Frère AF
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Feb; 23(2):232-45. PubMed ID: 14964567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pectoral muscle segmentation: a review.
    Ganesan K; Acharya UR; Chua KC; Min LC; Abraham KT
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Apr; 110(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 23270962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A hierarchical pipeline for breast boundary segmentation and calcification detection in mammograms.
    Shi P; Zhong J; Rampun A; Wang H
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 May; 96():178-188. PubMed ID: 29597143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic detection of pectoral muscle using average gradient and shape based feature.
    Chakraborty J; Mukhopadhyay S; Singla V; Khandelwal N; Bhattacharyya P
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Jun; 25(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 22006275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic extraction of pectoral muscle in the MLO view of mammograms.
    Feudjio CK; Klein J; Tiedeu A; Colot O
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 58(23):8493-515. PubMed ID: 24240510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms: Comparison of deep neural network to conventional computer vision.
    Ma X; Wei J; Zhou C; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Lu Y
    Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2103-2114. PubMed ID: 30771257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.