These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
63. Figures do matter: A literature review of 4587 robotic pancreatic resections and their implications on training. Levi Sandri GB; Abu Hilal M; Dokmak S; Edwin B; Hackert T; Keck T; Khatkov I; Besselink MG; Boggi U; J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2023 Jan; 30(1):21-35. PubMed ID: 35751504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. The impact of unplanned conversion to an open procedure during minimally invasive pancreatectomy. Stiles ZE; Dickson PV; Deneve JL; Glazer ES; Dong L; Wan JY; Behrman SW J Surg Res; 2018 Jul; 227():168-177. PubMed ID: 29804849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Factors associated with and consequences of open conversion after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: initial experience at a single institution. Goh BKP; Chan CY; Lee SY; Chan WH; Cheow PC; Chow PKH; Ooi LLPJ; Chung AYF ANZ J Surg; 2017 Dec; 87(12):E271-E275. PubMed ID: 27444856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic left pancreatectomy at a high-volume, minimally invasive center. Lyman WB; Passeri M; Sastry A; Cochran A; Iannitti DA; Vrochides D; Baker EH; Martinie JB Surg Endosc; 2019 Sep; 33(9):2991-3000. PubMed ID: 30421076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Propensity score-matched analysis of robotic versus open surgical enucleation for small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Tian F; Hong XF; Wu WM; Han XL; Wang MY; Cong L; Dai MH; Liao Q; Zhang TP; Zhao YP Br J Surg; 2016 Sep; 103(10):1358-64. PubMed ID: 27480993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Robotic surgery of the pancreas. Joyce D; Morris-Stiff G; Falk GA; El-Hayek K; Chalikonda S; Walsh RM World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Oct; 20(40):14726-32. PubMed ID: 25356035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Improved oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive left pancreatectomy: Propensity-score matched analysis of the National Cancer Database. Watson MD; Baimas-George MR; Thompson KJ; Iannitti DA; Ocuin LM; Baker EH; Martinie JB; Vrochides D J Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 122(7):1383-1392. PubMed ID: 32772366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. A retrospective comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic distal resection and enucleation for potentially benign pancreatic neoplasms. Najafi N; Mintziras I; Wiese D; Albers MB; Maurer E; Bartsch DK Surg Today; 2020 Aug; 50(8):872-880. PubMed ID: 32016613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Comparison between robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy with modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy: A propensity score-matched study. Wang SE; Shyr BU; Chen SC; Shyr YM Surgery; 2018 Dec; 164(6):1162-1167. PubMed ID: 30093277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Robotic versus open pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Zhang J; Wu WM; You L; Zhao YP Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):1774-80. PubMed ID: 23504140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Robotic versus Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy: A Meta-Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes. Zhou JY; Xin C; Mou YP; Xu XW; Zhang MZ; Zhou YC; Lu C; Chen RG PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151189. PubMed ID: 26974961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Central pancreatectomy: a comprehensive, up-to-date meta-analysis. Dragomir MP; Sabo AA; Petrescu GED; Li Y; Dumitrascu T Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2019 Dec; 404(8):945-958. PubMed ID: 31641855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant lesions of the pancreas: a single-center comparative study. Matsumoto I; Kamei K; Satoi S; Murase T; Matsumoto M; Kawaguchi K; Yoshida Y; Iwasaki T; Takebe A; Nakai T; Takeyama Y Surg Today; 2019 May; 49(5):394-400. PubMed ID: 30467718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Multicenter comparative study of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy using propensity score-matching. Nakamura M; Wakabayashi G; Miyasaka Y; Tanaka M; Morikawa T; Unno M; Tajima H; Kumamoto Y; Satoi S; Kwon M; Toyama H; Ku Y; Yoshitomi H; Nara S; Shimada K; Yokoyama T; Miyagawa S; Toyama Y; Yanaga K; Fujii T; Kodera Y; ; ; Tomiyama Y; Miyata H; Takahara T; Beppu T; Yamaue H; Miyazaki M; Takada T J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2015 Oct; 22(10):731-6. PubMed ID: 26087943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Initial experience with robotic pancreatic surgery in Singapore: single institution experience with 30 consecutive cases. Goh BKP; Low TY; Lee SY; Chan CY; Chung AYF; Ooi LLPJ ANZ J Surg; 2019 Mar; 89(3):206-210. PubMed ID: 29799169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open middle pancreatectomy: short-term results of a randomized controlled trial. Chen S; Zhan Q; Jin JB; Wu ZC; Shi Y; Cheng DF; Chen H; Deng XX; Shen BY; Peng CH; Li HW Surg Endosc; 2017 Feb; 31(2):962-971. PubMed ID: 27402095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Is the robotic approach the future of distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy? A propensity score matched analysis. Ross SB; Sucandy I; Vasanthakumar P; Christodoulou M; Pattilachan TM; Syblis C; Rosemurgy A J Robot Surg; 2024 Apr; 18(1):148. PubMed ID: 38564045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Survival and Robotic Approach for Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Propensity Score-Match Study. Rosemurgy AS; Ross SB; Espeut A; Nguyen D; Crespo K; Syblis C; Vasanthakumar P; Sucandy I J Am Coll Surg; 2022 Apr; 234(4):677-684. PubMed ID: 35290288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]