These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29582360)

  • 1. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure between the Ambu® AuraGain™ and the LMA® Supreme™ supraglottic airways: a randomized-controlled trial.
    Wong DT; Ooi A; Singh KP; Dallaire A; Meliana V; Lau J; Chung F; Singh M; Wong J
    Can J Anaesth; 2018 Jul; 65(7):797-805. PubMed ID: 29582360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ambu® AuraGain™ versus LMA Supreme™ Second Seal™: a randomised controlled trial comparing oropharyngeal leak pressures and gastric drain functionality in spontaneously breathing patients.
    Shariffuddin II; Teoh WH; Tang E; Hashim N; Loh PS
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2017 Mar; 45(2):244-250. PubMed ID: 28267947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ventilatory performance of AMBU® AuraGain™ and LMA® Supreme™ in laparoscopic surgery: A randomised controlled trial.
    Zhang J; Drakeford PA; Ng V; Seng Z; Chua M; Tan N; Mathew D; Teoh WH
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2021 Sep; 49(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 34550812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized comparison of the Ambu AuraGain versus the LMA supreme in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery.
    Lopez AM; Agusti M; Gambus P; Pons M; Anglada T; Valero R
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 27889843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pediatric supraglottic airway devices in clinical practice: A prospective observational study.
    Kleine-Brueggeney M; Gottfried A; Nabecker S; Greif R; Book M; Theiler L
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):119. PubMed ID: 28865448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA Protector™ vs the LMA Supreme™; a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Moser B; Keller C; Audigé L; Bruppacher HR
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2019 Mar; 63(3):322-328. PubMed ID: 30229857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel and Ambu AuraGain in children: A randomised noninferiority clinical trial.
    Mihara T; Nakayama R; Ka K; Goto T
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2019 Jun; 36(6):411-417. PubMed ID: 30950904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized crossover study assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure and fiber optic positioning : Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ versus Laryngeal Tube LTS II™ size 2 in non-paralyzed anesthetized children.
    Gasteiger L; Ofner S; Stögermüller B; Ziegler B; Brimacombe J; Keller C
    Anaesthesist; 2016 Aug; 65(8):585-9. PubMed ID: 27380049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial.
    Seet E; Rajeev S; Firoz T; Yousaf F; Wong J; Wong DT; Chung F
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Ambu AuraGain and BlockBuster laryngeal mask for controlled ventilation in children undergoing minor surgical procedures under general anesthesia: A prospective randomized controlled study.
    Kumar KR; Soni L; Sinha R; Muthiah T; Patel N; Shende DK; Subramaniam R
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2023 Jun; 33(6):474-480. PubMed ID: 36866955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective randomized comparison of airway seal using the novel vision-guided insertion of LMA-Supreme® and LMA-Protector®.
    van Zundert AAJ; Wyssusek KH; Pelecanos A; Roets M; Kumar CM
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Apr; 34(2):285-294. PubMed ID: 30953222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomised comparison of the Ambu® AuraGain™ and the LMA® supreme in infants and children.
    Jagannathan N; Hajduk J; Sohn L; Huang A; Sawardekar A; Gebhardt ER; Johnson K; De Oliveira GS
    Anaesthesia; 2016 Feb; 71(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 26648173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ at different intracuff pressures: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zhang L; Seet E; Mehta V; Subramanyam R; Ankichetty SP; Wong DT; Chung F
    Can J Anaesth; 2011 Jul; 58(7):624-629. PubMed ID: 21533663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. LMA Supreme™ and Ambu® AuraGain™ in anesthetized adult patients: a prospective observational study.
    Kriege M; Piepho T; Zanker S; Alflen C; Heid F; Noppens RR
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2017 Feb; 83(2):165-174. PubMed ID: 27676414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laryngeal mask airway protector generates higher oropharyngeal leak pressures compared to the laryngeal mask airway supreme: A randomized clinical trial in the ambulatory surgery unit.
    Acx E; Van Caelenberg E; De Baerdemaeker L; Coppens M
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2021; 37(2):221-225. PubMed ID: 34349370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ambu® Aura Gain™ versus Ambu® Aura Once™ in children: a randomized, crossover study assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic position.
    Stögermüller B; Ofner S; Ziegler B; Keller C; Moser B; Gasteiger L
    Can J Anaesth; 2019 Jan; 66(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 30315506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fiberoptic intubation of severely obese patients through supraglottic airway: A prospective, randomized trial of the Ambu
    Moser B; Keller C; Audigé L; Dave MH; Bruppacher HR
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2019 Feb; 63(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 30088266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical Performance Comparison of LMA Protector™ Cuff Pilot™ and LMA Supreme™ When Used in Anesthetized, Non-paralyzed Patients.
    Chan WK; Liu CY
    Cureus; 2022 Mar; 14(3):e23176. PubMed ID: 35308185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized comparative study of three supraglottic airway devices for controlled ventilation in anesthetized patients.
    Sharma M; Sharma B; Gupta M; Panday BC; Sahai C; Sood J
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2022; 38(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 36171925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Head Rotation Reduces Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure of the i-gel and LMA® Supreme™ in Paralyzed, Anesthetized Patients: A Randomized Trial.
    Chaki T; Tachibana S; Kumita S; Sato H; Hamada K; Tokinaga Y; Yamakage M
    Anesth Analg; 2021 Mar; 132(3):818-826. PubMed ID: 32889846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.