These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29582670)

  • 1. Determining paediatric patient thickness from a single digital radiograph-a proof of principle.
    Worrall M; Vinnicombe S; Sutton DG
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 91(1087):20180139. PubMed ID: 29582670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determining patient abdomen thickness from a single digital radiograph with a computational model: clinical results from a proof of concept study.
    Worrall M; Vinnicombe S; Sutton D
    Br J Radiol; 2020 Jul; 93(1111):20200010. PubMed ID: 32267728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grid removal and impact on population dose in full-field digital mammography.
    Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Klausz R; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 17388172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A filtering method for signal equalization in region-of-interest fluoroscopy.
    Robert N; Komljenovic PT; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):736-47. PubMed ID: 12033570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An empirical model of diagnostic x-ray attenuation under narrow-beam geometry.
    Mathieu KB; Kappadath SC; White RA; Atkinson EN; Cody DD
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4546-55. PubMed ID: 21928626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determining air kerma from pixel values in digital mammography.
    Toroi P; Nieminen MT; Tenkanen-Rautakoski P; Varjonen M
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(12):3865-79. PubMed ID: 19491454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
    Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient-specific pixel-based weighting factor dual-energy x-ray imaging system using a priori CT data.
    Darvish-Molla S; Reno MC; Sattarivand M
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):528-543. PubMed ID: 30582871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calibration of an amorphous-silicon flat panel portal imager for exit-beam dosimetry.
    Chen J; Chuang CF; Morin O; Aubin M; Pouliot J
    Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):584-94. PubMed ID: 16878562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x-ray system.
    Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Workman A; Yip M; Wells K; Young KC
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2721-34. PubMed ID: 22559643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient dose in digital mammography.
    Chevalier M; Morán P; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Cepeda T; Vañó E
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2471-9. PubMed ID: 15487727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of two objective methods to optimize kVp and personnel exposure using a digital indirect flat panel detector and simulated veterinary patients.
    Copple C; Robertson ID; Thrall DE; Samei E
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2013; 54(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 23293957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of radiographic techniques (kVp and mAs) on image quality and patient doses in digital subtraction angiography.
    Gkanatsios NA; Huda W; Peters KR
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1643-50. PubMed ID: 12201409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dose reduction using a dynamic, piecewise-linear attenuator.
    Hsieh SS; Fleischmann D; Pelc NJ
    Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021910. PubMed ID: 24506631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Method for measuring the focal spot size of an x-ray tube using a coded aperture mask and a digital detector.
    Russo P; Mettivier G
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2099-115. PubMed ID: 21626943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitometric response of the Sens-A-Ray, a charge-coupled imaging device, to changes in beam energy.
    Goshima T; Goshima Y; Scarfe WC; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jan; 25(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 9084280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
    Gosch D; Jendrass S; Scholz M; Kahn T
    Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Segmented crystalline scintillators: an initial investigation of high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
    Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Li Y; Su Z; Wang Y; Yamamoto J; Du H; Cunningham I; Klugerman M; Shah K
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3067-83. PubMed ID: 16279059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.