256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29582935)
1. The Charlson Comorbidity Index in Registry-based Research.
Brusselaers N; Lagergren J
Methods Inf Med; 2017; 56(5):401-406. PubMed ID: 29582935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-national comparative performance of three versions of the ICD-10 Charlson index.
Sundararajan V; Quan H; Halfon P; Fushimi K; Luthi JC; Burnand B; Ghali WA;
Med Care; 2007 Dec; 45(12):1210-5. PubMed ID: 18007172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality.
Sundararajan V; Henderson T; Perry C; Muggivan A; Quan H; Ghali WA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1288-94. PubMed ID: 15617955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Charlson scores based on ICD-10 administrative data were valid in assessing comorbidity in patients undergoing urological cancer surgery.
Nuttall M; van der Meulen J; Emberton M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 16488357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New ICD-10 version of the Multipurpose Australian Comorbidity Scoring System outperformed Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in an older population.
Toson B; Harvey LA; Close JC
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Nov; 79():62-69. PubMed ID: 27101889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standard Comorbidity Measures Do Not Predict Patient-reported Outcomes 1 Year After Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Greene ME; Rolfson O; Gordon M; Garellick G; Nemes S
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3370-9. PubMed ID: 25700999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Combined Comorbidity Index of Charlson and Elixhauser to Predict 30-Day Mortality Across ICD-9 and ICD-10.
Simard M; Sirois C; Candas B
Med Care; 2018 May; 56(5):441-447. PubMed ID: 29578951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Best Use of the Charlson Comorbidity Index With Electronic Health Care Database to Predict Mortality.
Bannay A; Chaignot C; Blotière PO; Basson M; Weill A; Ricordeau P; Alla F
Med Care; 2016 Feb; 54(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 26683778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the impact of transitioning to 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) on comorbidity indices.
Nikiema JN; Thiam D; Bayani A; Ayotte A; Sourial N; Bally M
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2024 May; 31(6):1219-1226. PubMed ID: 38489540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adaptation and Validation of the Combined Comorbidity Score for ICD-10-CM.
Sun JW; Rogers JR; Her Q; Welch EC; Panozzo CA; Toh S; Gagne JJ
Med Care; 2017 Dec; 55(12):1046-1051. PubMed ID: 29087983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simple Excel and ICD-10 based dataset calculator for the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices.
Prommik P; Tootsi K; Saluse T; Strauss E; Kolk H; Märtson A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jan; 22(1):4. PubMed ID: 34996364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients.
Thygesen SK; Christiansen CF; Christensen S; Lash TL; Sørensen HT
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 May; 11():83. PubMed ID: 21619668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk adjustment performance of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in ICD-9 and ICD-10 administrative databases.
Li B; Evans D; Faris P; Dean S; Quan H
BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Jan; 8():12. PubMed ID: 18194561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Searching for an improved clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data.
Ghali WA; Hall RE; Rosen AK; Ash AS; Moskowitz MA
J Clin Epidemiol; 1996 Mar; 49(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 8676173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ICD-9 diagnosis codes have poor sensitivity for identification of preexisting comorbidities in traumatic fracture patients: A study of the National Trauma Data Bank.
Samuel AM; Lukasiewicz AM; Webb ML; Bohl DD; Basques BA; Davis KA; Grauer JN
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2015 Oct; 79(4):622-30. PubMed ID: 26402537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.
Quan H; Sundararajan V; Halfon P; Fong A; Burnand B; Luthi JC; Saunders LD; Beck CA; Feasby TE; Ghali WA
Med Care; 2005 Nov; 43(11):1130-9. PubMed ID: 16224307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New Morbidity and Comorbidity Scores based on the Structure of the ICD-10.
Stausberg J; Hagn S
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0143365. PubMed ID: 26656501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ICD-10 adaptations of the Ontario acute myocardial infarction mortality prediction rules performed as well as the original versions.
Vermeulen MJ; Tu JV; Schull MJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 60(9):971-4. PubMed ID: 17689814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementation of ICD-10 in Canada: how has it impacted coded hospital discharge data?
Walker RL; Hennessy DA; Johansen H; Sambell C; Lix L; Quan H
BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Jun; 12():149. PubMed ID: 22682405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of comorbidity scores on re-operations following primary total hip replacement: comparison and validation of three comorbidity measures.
Gordon M; Stark A; Sköldenberg OG; Kärrholm J; Garellick G
Bone Joint J; 2013 Sep; 95-B(9):1184-91. PubMed ID: 23997129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
