272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2958364)
1. The role of laparoscopy in the evaluation of candidates for sterilization reversal.
Opsahl MS; Klein TA
Fertil Steril; 1987 Oct; 48(4):546-9. PubMed ID: 2958364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The choice of sterilizing procedure according to its potential reversibility with microsurgery.
Cantor B; Riggall FC
Fertil Steril; 1979 Jan; 31(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 421923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic and hysteroscopic approach for tubal anastomosis.
Tsin DA; Mahmood D
J Laparoendosc Surg; 1993 Feb; 3(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 8453132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Complications of female sterilization: immediate and delayed.
Huggins GR; Sondheimer SJ
Fertil Steril; 1984 Mar; 41(3):337-55. PubMed ID: 6230257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis and reversal of sterilization.
Barjot PJ; Marie G; Von Theobald P
Hum Reprod; 1999 May; 14(5):1222-5. PubMed ID: 10325266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microsurgical reversal of tubal sterilization: a report on 1,118 cases.
Kim SH; Shin CJ; Kim JG; Moon SY; Lee JY; Chang YS
Fertil Steril; 1997 Nov; 68(5):865-70. PubMed ID: 9389817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microsurgical repair of the fallopian tubes.
O'Brien BM; Sully L; Jolly HF; Morrison WA
Aust N Z J Surg; 1983 Apr; 53(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 6576766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microsurgical reversal of female sterilization: the role of tubal length.
Silber SJ; Cohen R
Fertil Steril; 1980 Jun; 33(6):598-601. PubMed ID: 7380046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity of hysterosalpingography after tubal surgery.
Letterie GS; Haggerty MF; Fellows DW
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1992; 251(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 1386980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reconstruction of fallopian tubes in previously sterilized patients.
Siegler AM; Perez RJ
Fertil Steril; 1975 May; 26(5):383-92. PubMed ID: 123865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Macroscopic tuboplasty: reversal of female sterilization.
Gupta I; Sawhney H; Mahajan U
Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1990 Dec; 16(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 2099726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors influencing the outcome of microsurgical tubal ligation reversals.
Seiler JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jun; 146(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 6859139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The evolution of tubal sterilization.
Seiler JS
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1984 Apr; 39(4):177-84. PubMed ID: 6717861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outpatient microsurgical reversal of tubal sterilization by a combined approach of laparoscopy and minilaparotomy.
Silva PD; Schaper AM; Meisch JK; Schauberger CW
Fertil Steril; 1991 Apr; 55(4):696-9. PubMed ID: 1826276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reversal of female sterilization: how reliable is the previous operative report?
Taylor PJ; Leader A
J Reprod Med; 1982 May; 27(5):246-8. PubMed ID: 6213770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. End-to-end tubal anastomosis using an absorbable stent.
Ansari AH
Fertil Steril; 1979 Aug; 32(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 467701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reversibility of female sterilization.
Siegler AM; Hulka J; Peretz A
Fertil Steril; 1985 Apr; 43(4):499-510. PubMed ID: 3157603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic sterilizations by electrocoagulation, the Hulka clip and the tubal ring.
Koetsawang S; Gates DS; Suwanichati S; Jivasak-Apimas S; Leckyim NA; Cilenti D
Contraception; 1990 Jan; 41(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 2137406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current status of elective sterilization in the United States.
Hulka JF
Fertil Steril; 1977 May; 28(5):515-20. PubMed ID: 140076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microsurgical reversal of tubal sterilization: a review.
Perone N
Tex Med; 1982 Nov; 78(11):47-54. PubMed ID: 6758174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]