BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2958411)

  • 1. The impact of DRG payment on New Jersey hospitals.
    Hsiao WC; Dunn DL
    Inquiry; 1987; 24(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 2958411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of the New Jersey all-payer DRG system.
    Rosko MD; Broyles RW
    Inquiry; 1986; 23(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 2937731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2006 Aug; 71(160):47869-8351. PubMed ID: 16921666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficiency, costs, and quality: the New Jersey experience revisited.
    Broyles RW
    Inquiry; 1990; 27(1):86-96. PubMed ID: 2139010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selected results from an evaluation of the New Jersey Diagnosis-Related Group System.
    May JJ; Wasserman J
    Health Serv Res; 1984 Dec; 19(5):547-59. PubMed ID: 6438023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DRG-based per diem payment system matches costs more accurately.
    Brannen TJ
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1999 Apr; 53(4):42-6. PubMed ID: 10557978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of the New Jersey all-payer rate-setting system: an analysis of financial ratios.
    Rosko MD
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1989; 34(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 10291809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hospital cost inflation under state rate-setting programs.
    Biles B; Schramm CJ; Atkinson JG
    N Engl J Med; 1980 Sep; 303(12):664-8. PubMed ID: 7190645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hospital cost control in Norway: a decade's experience with prospective payment.
    Crane TS
    Public Health Rep; 1985; 100(4):406-17. PubMed ID: 3927385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medicare program: changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2009 rates; payments for graduate medical education in certain emergency situations; changes to disclosure of physician ownership in hospitals and physician self-referral rules; updates to the long-term care prospective payment system; updates to certain IPPS-excluded hospitals; and collection of information regarding financial relationships between hospitals. Final rules.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2008 Aug; 73(161):48433-9084. PubMed ID: 18956499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is compression occurring in DRG prices?
    Lave JR
    Inquiry; 1985; 22(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 3159670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Illness-based payment to hospitals: the French experience].
    De Pouvourville G; Comar L; Bouvier V
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1994; 42(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 8134668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment system for acute care hospitals and fiscal year 2010 rates; and changes to the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and rate years 2010 and 2009 rates. Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2009 Aug; 74(165):43753-4236. PubMed ID: 19827228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hospital cost and efficiency under per service and per case payment in Maryland: a tale of the carrot and the stick.
    Salkever DS; Steinwachs DM; Rupp A
    Inquiry; 1986; 23(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 2937730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of ambulatory patient groups for regulation of hospital ambulatory surgery revenue in Maryland.
    Atkinson G; Murray R
    J Ambul Care Manage; 2008; 31(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 18162791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of alternative hospital payment systems on Medicaid costs.
    Holahan J
    Inquiry; 1988; 25(4):517-32. PubMed ID: 2976052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The origins, development, and passage of Medicare's revolutionary prospective payment system.
    Mayes R
    J Hist Med Allied Sci; 2007 Jan; 62(1):21-55. PubMed ID: 16467485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short-term responses of hospitals to the DRG prospective pricing mechanism in New Jersey.
    Rosko MD; Broyles RW
    Med Care; 1987 Feb; 25(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 3102862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medicaid and Blue Cross DRG payment plans: a comparison.
    Grimaldi PL
    Health Prog; 1985 Oct; 66(8):48-55, 79-80. PubMed ID: 10311310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New directions in health care financing.
    Robbins V
    JEMS; 1982 Sep; 7(9):45-53. PubMed ID: 10309828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.