489 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29584498)
1. The influence of child restraint lower attachment method on protection offered by forward facing child restraint systems in oblique loading conditions.
Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S139-S145. PubMed ID: 29584498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Influence of Enhanced Side Impact Protection on Kinematics and Injury Measures of Far- or Center-Seated Children in Forward-Facing Child Restraints.
Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S9-S15. PubMed ID: 26436248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Protection of children in forward-facing child restraint systems during oblique side impact sled tests: Intrusion and tether effects.
Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Kim J; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():156-62. PubMed ID: 27586117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative performance of forward-facing child restraint systems on the C/FMVSS 213 bench and vehicle seats.
Maltese MR; Tylko S; Belwadi A; Locey C; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S103-10. PubMed ID: 25307374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Top tether effectiveness during side impacts.
Majstorovic J; Bing J; Dahle E; Bolte J; Kang YS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S146-S152. PubMed ID: 29584504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methods to mitigate injury to toddlers in near-side impact crashes.
Kapoor T; Altenhof W; Howard A; Rasico J; Zhu F
Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Nov; 40(6):1880-92. PubMed ID: 19068290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A numerical investigation into the effect of CRS misuse on the injury potential of children in frontal and side impact crashes.
Kapoor T; Altenhof W; Snowdon A; Howard A; Rasico J; Zhu F; Baggio D
Accid Anal Prev; 2011 Jul; 43(4):1438-50. PubMed ID: 21545877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Frontal-oblique impact sled tests of a rearward-facing child restraint system with and without a support leg.
Patton DA; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107137. PubMed ID: 37295359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of center-mounted airbag in far-side impacts based on THOR sled tests.
Umale S; Hauschild H; Humm J; Driesslein K; Yoganandan N
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(7):726-731. PubMed ID: 31567026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of pediatric ATD biofidelity as compared to child volunteers in low-speed far-side oblique and lateral impacts.
Seacrist T; Locey CM; Mathews EA; Jones DL; Balasubramanian S; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S206-14. PubMed ID: 25307388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Frontal and oblique crash tests of HIII 6-year-old child ATD using real-world, observed child passenger postures.
Bohman K; Arbogast KB; Loeb H; Charlton JL; Koppel S; Cross SL
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S125-S130. PubMed ID: 29584494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Q3s ATD biomechanical responses to pediatric volunteers.
Ita M; Kang YS; Seacrist T; Dahle E; Bolte J
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S215-22. PubMed ID: 25307390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. THOR dummy chest deflection response in oblique and lateral far-side sled tests.
Yoganandan N; Hauschild H; Humm J; Purushothaman Y; Pintar FA
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S32-S37. PubMed ID: 31381439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in the kinematics of booster-seated pediatric occupants using two different car seats.
Juste-Lorente O; Maza M; Lorente AI; Lopez-Valdes FJ
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 28594247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of child restraint misuse on dynamic performance.
Manary MA; Flannagan CAC; Reed MP; Orton NR; Klinich KD
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(8):860-865. PubMed ID: 31670975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of the lack of restraint with and without belt pretensioning in 40.2 km/h rear impacts.
Viano DC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 36135987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Booster cushion design effects on child occupant kinematics and loading assessed using the PIPER 6-year-old HBM and the Q10 ATD in frontal impacts.
Bohman K; Östh J; Jakobsson L; Stockman I; Wimmerstedt M; Wallin H
Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S25-S30. PubMed ID: 32816572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Occupant responses in conventional and ABTS seats in high-speed rear sled tests.
Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R; Prasad P
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 28678610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of LATCH versus Available Seatbelt Installation of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on Head Injury Criteria for 6 Month Old Infants in Rear End Collisions.
Williams JR; O'Donel CA; Leiss PJ
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S16-23. PubMed ID: 26436226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Occupant kinematics of the Hybrid III, THOR-M, and postmortem human surrogates under various restraint conditions in full-scale frontal sled tests.
Albert DL; Beeman SM; Kemper AR
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S50-S58. PubMed ID: 29584475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]