270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29584593)
21. Assessing the Positive Predictive Value of Architectural Distortion Detected with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in BI-RADS 4 Cases.
Dou E; Ksepka M; Dodelzon K; Shingala PY; Katzen JT
J Breast Imaging; 2020 Nov; 2(6):552-560. PubMed ID: 38424858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dense Breast Ultrasound Screening After Digital Mammography Versus After Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Dibble EH; Singer TM; Jimoh N; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Dec; 213(6):1397-1402. PubMed ID: 31553658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Digital tomosynthesis spot view in architectural distortions: outcomes in management and radiation dose.
Fiaschetti V; Ubaldi N; De Fazio S; Ricci A; Maspes F; Cossu E
Radiol Med; 2023 Jan; 128(1):35-48. PubMed ID: 36534241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Additional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Detected Suspicious Lesions in Known Patients With Breast Cancer: Comparison of Second-Look Digital Tomosynthesis and Ultrasonography.
Koh J; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Yoon JH; Moon HJ
Ultrasound Q; 2017 Jun; 33(2):167-173. PubMed ID: 28221238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Digital breast Tomosynthesis vacuum assisted biopsy for Tomosynthesis-detected Sonographically occult lesions.
Ariaratnam NS; Little ST; Whitley MA; Ferguson K
Clin Imaging; 2018; 47():4-8. PubMed ID: 28806573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Characterization of breast lesions: comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonography.
Kim SA; Chang JM; Cho N; Yi A; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 25741187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pathology results of architectural distortion on detected with digital breast tomosynthesis without definite sonographic correlate.
Walcott-Sapp S; Garreau J; Johnson N; Thomas KA
Am J Surg; 2019 May; 217(5):857-861. PubMed ID: 30777292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Increased Cancer Detection Rate and Variations in the Recall Rate Resulting from Implementation of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis into a Population-based Screening Program.
Sharpe RE; Venkataraman S; Phillips J; Dialani V; Fein-Zachary VJ; Prakash S; Slanetz PJ; Mehta TS
Radiology; 2016 Mar; 278(3):698-706. PubMed ID: 26458206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in breast cancer detection in comparison to tomosynthesis, synthetic 2D mammography and tomosynthesis combined with ultrasound in women with dense breast.
Sudhir R; Sannapareddy K; Potlapalli A; Krishnamurthy PB; Buddha S; Koppula V
Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201046. PubMed ID: 33242249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparative efficacy study of diagnostic digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in BI-RADS 4 breast cancer diagnosis.
Ezeana CF; Puppala M; Wang L; Chang JC; Wong STC
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Aug; 153():110361. PubMed ID: 35617870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Interval and Consecutive Round Breast Cancer after Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography in BreastScreen Norway.
Hovda T; Holen ÅS; Lång K; Albertsen JL; Bjørndal H; Brandal SHB; Sahlberg KK; Skaane P; Suhrke P; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):256-264. PubMed ID: 31821118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Local Tumor Staging of Breast Cancer: Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis.
Fontaine M; Tourasse C; Pages E; Laurent N; Laffargue G; Millet I; Molinari N; Taourel P
Radiology; 2019 Jun; 291(3):594-603. PubMed ID: 30964425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Malignant Outcomes of Architectural Distortion on Tomosynthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Choudhery S; Johnson MP; Larson NB; Anderson T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 32966111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Characterization of Breast Masses in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammograms: An Observer Performance Study.
Chan HP; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Jeffries DO; Klein KA; Neal CH; Noroozian M; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA
Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1372-1379. PubMed ID: 28647388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening.
Østerås BH; Martinsen ACT; Gullien R; Skaane P
Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 31407968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Use of single-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and ultrasound vs. additional views and ultrasound for the assessment of screen-detected abnormalities: German multi-reader study.
Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Hacker A; Jänsch A; Kates R; Wulz-Horber S;
Acta Radiol; 2018 Jul; 59(7):782-788. PubMed ID: 28929783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Additional findings at preoperative breast MRI: the value of second-look digital breast tomosynthesis.
Clauser P; Carbonaro LA; Pancot M; Girometti R; Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Sardanelli F
Eur Radiol; 2015 Oct; 25(10):2830-9. PubMed ID: 25903704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Benefit of digital breast tomosynthesis in symptomatic young women (≤30 years) diagnosed with BI-RADS category 4 or 5 on ultrasound.
Huang JL; Lin Q
Clin Radiol; 2022 Jan; 77(1):e55-e63. PubMed ID: 34763818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
