These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2958591)

  • 1. Evidence of preliminary response preparation from a divided attention task.
    Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 Aug; 13(3):425-34. PubMed ID: 2958591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Response force in probe reaction time tasks: reduction in capacity, response inhibition or bottle neck?].
    Mattes S
    Z Exp Psychol; 2001; 48(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 11486637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Size scaling and spatial factors in visual attention.
    Goolkasian P
    Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(3):397-415. PubMed ID: 9339537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vision and touch in ageing: crossmodal selective attention and visuotactile spatial interactions.
    Poliakoff E; Ashworth S; Lowe C; Spence C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 16098997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual attention during the preparation of bimanual movements.
    Baldauf D; Deubel H
    Vision Res; 2008 Feb; 48(4):549-63. PubMed ID: 18206205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response selection in visual search: the influence of response compatibility of nontargets.
    Starreveld PA; Theeuwes J; Mortier K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):56-78. PubMed ID: 14769068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional changes during implicit learning: signal validity protects a target stimulus from the attentional blink.
    Livesey EJ; Harris IM; Harris JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):408-22. PubMed ID: 19271855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Suppression of irrelevant location information by individuals with and without mental retardation.
    Merrill EC; Cha KH; Moore AL
    Am J Ment Retard; 1994 Sep; 99(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 7803037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 18845280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dopamine receptor (DRD2) genotype-dependent effects of nicotine on attention and distraction during rapid visual information processing.
    Gilbert DG; Izetelny A; Radtke R; Hammersley J; Rabinovich NE; Jameson TR; Huggenvik JI
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2005 Jun; 7(3):361-79. PubMed ID: 16085504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming.
    Rothermund K; Wentura D; De Houwer J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):482-95. PubMed ID: 15910132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of response priming on the planning and execution of goal-directed movements in the presence of a distracting stimulus.
    Welsh TN; Elliott D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Jun; 119(2):123-42. PubMed ID: 15877977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deployment of visual attention before sequences of goal-directed hand movements.
    Baldauf D; Wolf M; Deubel H
    Vision Res; 2006 Dec; 46(26):4355-74. PubMed ID: 17034829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention?
    Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):826-42. PubMed ID: 2148595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Capacity limits for face processing.
    Bindemann M; Burton AM; Jenkins R
    Cognition; 2005 Dec; 98(2):177-97. PubMed ID: 16307958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anticipated action consequences as a nexus between action and perception: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Nikolaev AR; Ziessler M; Dimova K; van Leeuwen C
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Apr; 78(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 18289769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Miller J; Alderton M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):149-65. PubMed ID: 16478333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The development of visual search in infants and very young children.
    Gerhardstein P; Rovee-Collier C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2002 Feb; 81(2):194-215. PubMed ID: 11786009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect.
    Shore DI; Barnes ME; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jan; 392(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 16213655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.