These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2958595)
1. Additivity and interaction between size ratio and response category in the comparison of size-discrepant shapes. Jolicoeur P; Besner D J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 Aug; 13(3):478-87. PubMed ID: 2958595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of contour closure on shape recognition. Garrigan P Perception; 2012; 41(2):221-35. PubMed ID: 22670349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Directional effects of size change on the comparison of visual shapes. Howard JH; Kerst SM Am J Psychol; 1978 Sep; 91(3):491-9. PubMed ID: 742663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Circumscribed shapes are enlarged: is this a variation of the Delboeuf illusion? Jaeger T Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Jun; 104(3 Pt 2):1116-8. PubMed ID: 17879645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multidimensional same--different judgments: evidence against independent comparisons of dimensions. Miller J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 Aug; 4(3):411-22. PubMed ID: 681890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How shape from contours affects shape from shading. Todorović D Vision Res; 2014 Oct; 103():1-10. PubMed ID: 25130407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shape completion time depends on the size of the occluded region. Shore DI; Enns JT J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Aug; 23(4):980-98. PubMed ID: 9269724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of pictorial depth information on projected size judgments. Farran EK; Whitaker A; Patel N Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 19304611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A behavioral and electrophysiological study of the comparison of size-discrepant shapes. Pierret A; Peronnet F; Echallier JF J Physiol Paris; 1994; 88(5):279-90. PubMed ID: 7787828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The computation of occluded contours in visual agnosia: Evidence for early computation prior to shape binding and figure-ground coding. Giersch A; Humphreys GW; Boucart M; Kovacs I Cogn Neuropsychol; 2000 Dec; 17(8):731-59. PubMed ID: 20945203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ERP signs of categorical and supra-categorical processing of visual information. Zani A; Marsili G; Senerchia A; Orlandi A; Citron FM; Rizzi E; Proverbio AM Biol Psychol; 2015 Jan; 104():90-107. PubMed ID: 25447739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of constant curvature in 2-D contour shape representations. Garrigan P; Kellman PJ Perception; 2011; 40(11):1290-308. PubMed ID: 22416588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Both predictability and familiarity facilitate contour integration. Sassi M; Demeyer M; Machilsen B; Putzeys T; Wagemans J J Vis; 2014 May; 14(5):11. PubMed ID: 24879858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. View sensitivity increases for same-shape matches if mismatches show pairs of more similar shapes. Lawson R Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Oct; 11(5):896-902. PubMed ID: 15732700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Open vs. Closed Shapes: New Perceptual Categories? Burlinson D; Subramanian K; Goolkasian P IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2018 Jan; 24(1):574-583. PubMed ID: 28866568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]