148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2958630)
1. Comparison of detection procedures for Chlamydia trachomatis, including enzyme immunoassays, in a mouse model of genital infection.
Taylor-Robinson D; Tuffrey M
J Med Microbiol; 1987 Sep; 24(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 2958630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women.
Olsen MA; Sambol AR; Bohnert VA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Feb; 119(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 7848062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of chlamydiazyme for the detection of genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.
Howard LV; Coleman PF; England BJ; Herrmann JE
J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Feb; 23(2):329-32. PubMed ID: 3517052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of three non-culture techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital tract specimens.
Hall CJ; Nelder C
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1989 Oct; 8(10):866-70. PubMed ID: 2512130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis--culture or enzyme immunoassay? Norwegian multicenter study].
Nordbø SA; Mehl A; Vik IS; Ragnhildstveit E
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 Aug; 111(19):2413-6. PubMed ID: 1926077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of chlamydiazyme for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital infections.
Monno R; De Vito D; Vena GA; Mosca A; Miragliotta G
Microbiologica; 1987 Oct; 10(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 3320688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of DNA probe, monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
LeBar W; Herschman B; Jemal C; Pierzchala J
J Clin Microbiol; 1989 May; 27(5):826-8. PubMed ID: 2663916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivities of PCR, MicroTrak, ChlamydiaEIA, IDEIA, and PACE 2 for purified Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies in urine, peripheral blood, peripheral blood leukocytes, and synovial fluid.
Kuipers JG; Scharmann K; Wollenhaupt J; Nettelnbreker E; Hopf S; Zeidler H
J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Dec; 33(12):3186-90. PubMed ID: 8586699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first catch urine samples from symptomatic and asymptomatic males.
Moncada J; Schachter J; Shafer MA; Williams E; Gourlay L; Lavin B; Bolan G
Sex Transm Dis; 1994; 21(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 8140494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Pharmacia Chlamydia EIA, IDEIA and cell culture in the detection of urogenital chlamydial infection.
Bygdeman SM; Lidbrink P; Nahkiaisoja M; Parkhede U
Int J STD AIDS; 1990 May; 1(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 2083294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of an enzyme immunoassay (IDEIA) with tissue culture isolation for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis using a single swab.
Krech T; Gerhard-Fsadni D; Degen KW; Vossel R; Géraud GP
Microbiologica; 1989 Apr; 12(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 2664432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of an enzyme immunoassay (Ortho) with cell culture and immunofluorescence for the detection of genital chlamydial infection.
Mumtaz G; Ridgway GL; Nayagam AT; Robinson AJ
Int J STD AIDS; 1990 May; 1(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 2083292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Limited value of two widely used enzyme immunoassays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women.
Thomas BJ; MacLeod EJ; Hay PE; Horner PJ; Taylor-Robinson D
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 Aug; 13(8):651-5. PubMed ID: 7813495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of three immunoassays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from asymptomatic males.
Leonardi GP; Seitz M; Edstrom R; Cruz J; Costello P; Szabo K
J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Nov; 30(11):2793-6. PubMed ID: 1452648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative evaluation of detection assays for Chlamydia trachomatis.
Warren R; Dwyer B; Plackett M; Pettit K; Rizvi N; Baker AM
J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Jun; 31(6):1663-6. PubMed ID: 8315015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two enzyme immunoassays and an immunofluorescence test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Grillner L; Beckman S; Hammar H
Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Oct; 5(5):559-62. PubMed ID: 3536502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of cell culture with two direct Chlamydia tests using immunofluorescence or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Pothier P; Kazmierczak A
Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Oct; 5(5):569-72. PubMed ID: 3536504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections by cell culture and two enzyme immunoassays detecting different chlamydial antigens.
Mahony J; Castriciano S; Sellors J; Stewart I; Cunningham I; Landis S; Seidelman W; Grant L; Devlin C; Chernesky M
J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Sep; 27(9):1934-8. PubMed ID: 2674191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The superiority of polymerase chain reaction over an amplified enzyme immunoassay for the detection of genital chlamydial infections.
Jalal H; Stephen H; Al-Suwaine A; Sonnex C; Carne C
Sex Transm Infect; 2006 Feb; 82(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 16461600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of direct immunofluorescent staining and an enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay for identifying Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical and urethral specimens.
Wiesmeier E; Bruckner DA; Malotte CK; Downie A
J Reprod Med; 1989 Aug; 34(8):517-9. PubMed ID: 2681749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
