247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29588360)
41. A cloud-compatible bioinformatics pipeline for ultrarapid pathogen identification from next-generation sequencing of clinical samples.
Naccache SN; Federman S; Veeraraghavan N; Zaharia M; Lee D; Samayoa E; Bouquet J; Greninger AL; Luk KC; Enge B; Wadford DA; Messenger SL; Genrich GL; Pellegrino K; Grard G; Leroy E; Schneider BS; Fair JN; Martínez MA; Isa P; Crump JA; DeRisi JL; Sittler T; Hackett J; Miller S; Chiu CY
Genome Res; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1180-92. PubMed ID: 24899342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. High throughput sequencing methods and analysis for microbiome research.
Di Bella JM; Bao Y; Gloor GB; Burton JP; Reid G
J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Dec; 95(3):401-14. PubMed ID: 24029734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Biofilm-growing bacteria involved in the corrosion of concrete wastewater pipes: protocols for comparative metagenomic analyses.
Gomez-Alvarez V
Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1147():323-40. PubMed ID: 24664844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. k-SLAM: accurate and ultra-fast taxonomic classification and gene identification for large metagenomic data sets.
Ainsworth D; Sternberg MJE; Raczy C; Butcher SA
Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Feb; 45(4):1649-1656. PubMed ID: 27965413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. What Is Metagenomics Teaching Us, and What Is Missed?
New FN; Brito IL
Annu Rev Microbiol; 2020 Sep; 74():117-135. PubMed ID: 32603623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Inferring Species Compositions of Complex Fungal Communities from Long- and Short-Read Sequence Data.
Hu Y; Irinyi L; Hoang MTV; Eenjes T; Graetz A; Stone EA; Meyer W; Schwessinger B; Rathjen JP
mBio; 2022 Apr; 13(2):e0244421. PubMed ID: 35404122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Testing the advantages and disadvantages of short- and long- read eukaryotic metagenomics using simulated reads.
Pearman WS; Freed NE; Silander OK
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 May; 21(1):220. PubMed ID: 32471343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Metagenomic analysis through the extended Burrows-Wheeler transform.
Guerrini V; Louza FA; Rosone G
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Sep; 21(Suppl 8):299. PubMed ID: 32938362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. COMAN: a web server for comprehensive metatranscriptomics analysis.
Ni Y; Li J; Panagiotou G
BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):622. PubMed ID: 27515514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. WebCARMA: a web application for the functional and taxonomic classification of unassembled metagenomic reads.
Gerlach W; Jünemann S; Tille F; Goesmann A; Stoye J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Dec; 10():430. PubMed ID: 20021646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Libra: scalable k-mer-based tool for massive all-vs-all metagenome comparisons.
Choi I; Ponsero AJ; Bomhoff M; Youens-Clark K; Hartman JH; Hurwitz BL
Gigascience; 2019 Feb; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 30597002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Critical steps in clinical shotgun metagenomics for the concomitant detection and typing of microbial pathogens.
Couto N; Schuele L; Raangs EC; Machado MP; Mendes CI; Jesus TF; Chlebowicz M; Rosema S; Ramirez M; Carriço JA; Autenrieth IB; Friedrich AW; Peter S; Rossen JW
Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13767. PubMed ID: 30213965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Identification and quantitation of clinically relevant microbes in patient samples: Comparison of three k-mer based classifiers for speed, accuracy, and sensitivity.
Watts GS; Thornton JE; Youens-Clark K; Ponsero AJ; Slepian MJ; Menashi E; Hu C; Deng W; Armstrong DG; Reed S; Cranmer LD; Hurwitz BL
PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Nov; 15(11):e1006863. PubMed ID: 31756192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Identification of city specific important bacterial signature for the MetaSUB CAMDA challenge microbiome data.
Walker AR; Datta S
Biol Direct; 2019 Jul; 14(1):11. PubMed ID: 31340852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Studying long 16S rDNA sequences with ultrafast-metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments (Kraken).
Valenzuela-González F; Martínez-Porchas M; Villalpando-Canchola E; Vargas-Albores F
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Mar; 122():38-42. PubMed ID: 26812576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [A review on the bioinformatics pipelines for metagenomic research].
Ye DD; Fan MM; Guan Q; Chen HJ; Ma ZS
Dongwuxue Yanjiu; 2012 Dec; 33(6):574-85. PubMed ID: 23266976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Assessment of a 16S rRNA amplicon Illumina sequencing procedure for studying the microbiome of a symbiont-rich aphid genus.
Jousselin E; Clamens AL; Galan M; Bernard M; Maman S; Gschloessl B; Duport G; Meseguer AS; Calevro F; Coeur d'acier A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 May; 16(3):628-40. PubMed ID: 26458227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Evaluation of a hybrid approach using UBLAST and BLASTX for metagenomic sequences annotation of specific functional genes.
Yang Y; Jiang XT; Zhang T
PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110947. PubMed ID: 25347677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Benchmarking blast accuracy of genus/phyla classification of metagenomic reads.
Essinger SD; Rosen GL
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2010; ():10-20. PubMed ID: 19908353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A comprehensive evaluation of the sl1p pipeline for 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis.
Whelan FJ; Surette MG
Microbiome; 2017 Aug; 5(1):100. PubMed ID: 28807046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
