196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29589102)
1. Dilemmas for the pathologist in the oncologic assessment of pancreatoduodenectomy specimens : An overview of different grossing approaches and the relevance of the histopathological characteristics in the oncologic assessment of pancreatoduodenectomy specimens.
Soer E; Brosens L; van de Vijver M; Dijk F; van Velthuysen ML; Farina-Sarasqueta A; Morreau H; Offerhaus J; Koens L; Verheij J
Virchows Arch; 2018 Apr; 472(4):533-543. PubMed ID: 29589102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors predicting adequate lymph node yield in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for malignancy.
Sierzega M; Bobrzyński Ł; Matyja A; Kulig J
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 14(1):248. PubMed ID: 27644962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Resection margin involvement and tumour origin in pancreatic head cancer.
Verbeke CS; Gladhaug IP
Br J Surg; 2012 Aug; 99(8):1036-49. PubMed ID: 22517199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Standardized grossing protocol is useful for the pathology reporting of malignant neoplasms other than adenocarcinomas treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Liszka Ł; Mrowiec S; Kuśnierz K; Kajor M
Histol Histopathol; 2017 Feb; 32(2):177-192. PubMed ID: 27180587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reclassification of tumour origin in resected periampullary adenocarcinomas reveals underestimation of distal bile duct cancer.
Pomianowska E; Grzyb K; Westgaard A; Clausen OP; Gladhaug IP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1043-50. PubMed ID: 22883964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival estimates after pancreatoduodenectomy skewed by non-standardized histopathology reports.
Westgaard A; Clausen OP; Gladhaug IP
APMIS; 2011 Oct; 119(10):689-700. PubMed ID: 21917006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The number of lymph nodes identified in a simple pancreatoduodenectomy specimen: comparison of conventional vs orange-peeling approach in pathologic assessment.
Adsay NV; Basturk O; Altinel D; Khanani F; Coban I; Weaver DW; Kooby DA; Sarmiento JM; Staley C
Mod Pathol; 2009 Jan; 22(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 18820663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Whipple Grossing in the Era of New Staging: Should We Standardize?
Shi J; Basturk O
Diagnostics (Basel); 2019 Sep; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 31569496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Axial slicing versus bivalving in the pathological examination of pancreatoduodenectomy specimens (APOLLO): a multicentre randomized controlled trial.
van Roessel S; Soer EC; van Dieren S; Koens L; van Velthuysen MLF; Doukas M; Groot Koerkamp B; Fariña Sarasqueta A; Bronkhorst CM; Raicu GM; Kuijpers KC; Seldenrijk CA; van Santvoort HC; Molenaar IQ; van der Post RS; Stommel MWJ; Busch OR; Besselink MG; Brosens LAA; Verheij J;
HPB (Oxford); 2021 Sep; 23(9):1349-1359. PubMed ID: 33563546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Towards a More Standardized Approach to Pathologic Reporting of Pancreatoduodenectomy Specimens for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Cross-continental and Cross-specialty Survey From the Pancreatobiliary Pathology Society Grossing Working Group.
Dhall D; Shi J; Allende DS; Jang KT; Basturk O; Adsay V; Kim GE
Am J Surg Pathol; 2021 Oct; 45(10):1364-1373. PubMed ID: 33899790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Resection margins in pancreatic cancer.
Verbeke CS
Pathologe; 2013 Nov; 34 Suppl 2():241-7. PubMed ID: 24196622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic indicators following curative pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma: A retrospective multivariate analysis of a single centre experience.
Petrou A; Soonawalla Z; Silva MA; Manzelli A; Moris D; Tabet PP; Friend P
J BUON; 2016; 21(4):874-882. PubMed ID: 27685908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Morphology, TNM staging and survival with Pancreatico-duodenectomy specimens received at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Pakistan.
Qureshi A; Hassan U; Azam M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(4):953-6. PubMed ID: 21790232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is pancreatoduodenectomy justified for periampullary cancers with regional lymph node involvement?
Shyr YM; Su CH; Lo SS; Wang HC; Lui WY
Am Surg; 1995 Apr; 61(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 7893088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of pathology sampling protocols for pancreatoduodenectomy specimens.
Grillo F; Ferro J; Vanoli A; Delfanti S; Pitto F; Peñuela L; Bianchi R; Grami O; Fiocca R; Mastracci L
Virchows Arch; 2020 May; 476(5):735-744. PubMed ID: 31802231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Changes in lymph node dissection for pancreatic cancer].
Miyazaki I; Kayahara M; Nagakawa T
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1997 Jul; 98(7):610-4. PubMed ID: 9276867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Significance of positive ductal margin and prognostic factors of surgical resection in middle and distal bile duct carcinoma].
Liang JW; Zhao P; Zhou ZX; Tian YT; Zhao DB; Wang CF
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 47(9):677-80. PubMed ID: 19615237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dissection of Pancreatic Resection Specimens.
Verbeke CS; Gladhaug IP
Surg Pathol Clin; 2016 Dec; 9(4):523-538. PubMed ID: 27926357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Resectable adenocarcinomas in the pancreatic head: the retroperitoneal resection margin is an independent prognostic factor.
Westgaard A; Tafjord S; Farstad IN; Cvancarova M; Eide TJ; Mathisen O; Clausen OP; Gladhaug IP
BMC Cancer; 2008 Jan; 8():5. PubMed ID: 18194510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pancreatoduodenectomy using a no-touch isolation technique.
Hirota M; Kanemitsu K; Takamori H; Chikamoto A; Tanaka H; Sugita H; Sand J; Nordback I; Baba H
Am J Surg; 2010 May; 199(5):e65-8. PubMed ID: 19095210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
