These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29589264)

  • 1. Short- and Long-Term Oncological Outcome After Rectal Cancer Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Open Versus Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery.
    Nienhüser H; Heger P; Schmitz R; Kulu Y; Diener MK; Klose J; Schneider M; Müller-Stich BP; Ulrich A; Büchler MW; Mihaljevic AL; Schmidt T
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Aug; 22(8):1418-1433. PubMed ID: 29589264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. There is no difference in outcome between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes.
    Pędziwiatr M; Małczak P; Mizera M; Witowski J; Torbicz G; Major P; Pisarska M; Wysocki M; Budzyński A
    Tech Coloproctol; 2017 Aug; 21(8):595-604. PubMed ID: 28795243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Vennix S; Pelzers L; Bouvy N; Beets GL; Pierie JP; Wiggers T; Breukink S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Apr; 2014(4):CD005200. PubMed ID: 24737031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients.
    Feliciotti F; Guerrieri M; Paganini AM; De Sanctis A; Campagnacci R; Perretta S; D'Ambrosio G; Lezoche E
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Oct; 17(10):1530-5. PubMed ID: 12874687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pathologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs Open Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Martínez-Pérez A; Carra MC; Brunetti F; de'Angelis N
    JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):e165665. PubMed ID: 28196217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes.
    Huang MJ; Liang JL; Wang H; Kang L; Deng YH; Wang JP
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2011 Apr; 26(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 21174107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis of classic randomized controlled trials and high-quality Nonrandomized Studies in the last 5 years.
    Chen K; Cao G; Chen B; Wang M; Xu X; Cai W; Xu Y; Xiong M
    Int J Surg; 2017 Mar; 39():1-10. PubMed ID: 28087370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Controversies in Surgical Oncology: Does the Minimally Invasive Approach for Rectal Cancer Provide Equivalent Oncologic Outcomes Compared with the Open Approach?
    Cleary RK; Morris AM; Chang GJ; Halverson AL
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 25(12):3587-3595. PubMed ID: 30187281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mid- and low-rectal cancer: laparoscopic vs open treatment-short- and long-term results. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Schietroma M; Romano L; Apostol AI; Vada S; Necozione S; Carlei F; Giuliani A
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Jan; 37(1):71-99. PubMed ID: 34716474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopy for rectal cancer is oncologically adequate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.
    Arezzo A; Passera R; Salvai A; Arolfo S; Allaix ME; Schwarzer G; Morino M
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Feb; 29(2):334-48. PubMed ID: 25007974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Prete FP; Pezzolla A; Prete F; Testini M; Marzaioli R; Patriti A; Jimenez-Rodriguez RM; Gurrado A; Strippoli GFM
    Ann Surg; 2018 Jun; 267(6):1034-1046. PubMed ID: 28984644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Stevenson AR; Solomon MJ; Lumley JW; Hewett P; Clouston AD; Gebski VJ; Davies L; Wilson K; Hague W; Simes J;
    JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(13):1356-63. PubMed ID: 26441180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Feng Q; Yuan W; Li T; Tang B; Jia B; Zhou Y; Zhang W; Zhao R; Zhang C; Cheng L; Zhang X; Liang F; He G; Wei Y; Xu J;
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Nov; 7(11):991-1004. PubMed ID: 36087608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical resection for rectal cancer. Is laparoscopic surgery as successful as open approach? A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Milone M; Manigrasso M; Burati M; Velotti N; Milone F; De Palma GD
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204887. PubMed ID: 30300377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopy is non-inferior to open surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ma L; Yu HJ; Zhu YB; Li WX; Xu KY; Zhao AM; Ding L; Gao H
    Cancer Med; 2024 Jul; 13(13):e7363. PubMed ID: 38970275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.
    Anderson C; Uman G; Pigazzi A
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1135-42. PubMed ID: 18191529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic vs. open mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Are these approaches still comparable? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Conticchio M; Papagni V; Notarnicola M; Delvecchio A; Riccelli U; Ammendola M; Currò G; Pessaux P; Silvestris N; Memeo R
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235887. PubMed ID: 32722694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effectiveness and Safety of Open Versus laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemo-radiotherapy: A Meta-Analysis.
    Zhang JJ; Guo BL; Zheng QX; Chen ZY
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2019; 22(3):153-159. PubMed ID: 30987563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic and converted approaches to rectal cancer resection have superior long-term outcomes: a comparative study by operative approach.
    Keller DS; Khorgami Z; Swendseid B; Champagne BJ; Reynolds HL; Stein SL; Delaney CP
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Jun; 28(6):1940-8. PubMed ID: 24515259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and conventional open surgery for rectal cancer.
    Ohtani H; Tamamori Y; Azuma T; Mori Y; Nishiguchi Y; Maeda K; Hirakawa K
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2011 Aug; 15(8):1375-85. PubMed ID: 21557014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.